On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:33:55PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
+if ! test x$UNSTABLE_LIB = xyes; then
+AC_MSG_ERROR([This branch contains elements which have not yet been
finalised. When this branch is updated, you will probably need to recompile
both the any clients using the library,
On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:33:55PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
+if ! test x$UNSTABLE_LIB = xyes; then
+AC_MSG_ERROR([This branch contains elements which have not yet been
finalised. When this branch is updated, you will
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:17:39PM -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
---
hw/xfree86/fbdevhw/fbdevhw.h |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:17:45PM -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
This makes a difference on darwin (and apparently nowhere else)
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
---
According to the libtool manual, modules that can be dlopened need
libtool's -module switch. So I think
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:17:39PM -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
---
hw/xfree86/fbdevhw/fbdevhw.h |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Sep 14, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
+if HAVE_XMLTO_TEXT
+noinst_DATA += $(docbook:.xml=.txt)
+%.txt: %.xml $(chapters)
+ $(AM_V_GEN)$(XMLTO) $(XMLTO_HTML_FLAGS) txt $
+endif HAVE_XMLTO_TEXT
^^^ XMLTO_TEXT_FLAGS ??
___
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Jamey Sharp wrote:
Throughout the xserver git history, the generic portion of the int10
module has always used other methods for reading the video BIOS. For
some time now it's been purely libpciaccess based. This
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
On Sep 14, 2011, at 5:25 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
These symbols were not renamed when they were added to libfb:
# nm -D libwfb.so | grep ' fb'
00028d00 T fbTrapezoids
00028d60 T fbTriangles
This causes corruption and/or
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 20:17:41 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Every module building against xorg-server does not *Require* pixman nor
libpciaccess. If such modules need pixman or pciaccess, they should be
depending on them directly rather than inheriting a dependency from
xorg-server.
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:58 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 20:17:41 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Every module building against xorg-server does not *Require* pixman nor
libpciaccess. If such modules need pixman or pciaccess, they should be
depending on them directly
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:20:02 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:58 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 20:17:41 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Every module building against xorg-server does not *Require* pixman nor
libpciaccess. If such modules
Every module building against xorg-server does not *Require* pixman nor
libpciaccess. If such modules need pixman or pciaccess, they should be
depending on them directly rather than inheriting a dependency from
xorg-server.
The thing is, most video drivers *do* need pixman and pciaccess,
On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:30 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:20:02 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if the servers that we cared about were in the
xorg-server tree itself, so I could try building with these changes on a
linux machine to see what broke.
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 02:23 -0500, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:17:45PM -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
This makes a difference on darwin (and apparently nowhere else)
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
---
According to the libtool manual, modules
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 20:17 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Every module building against xorg-server does not *Require* pixman nor
libpciaccess. If such modules need pixman or pciaccess, they should be
depending on them directly rather than inheriting a dependency from
xorg-server.
This
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 02:35 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
+if HAVE_XMLTO_TEXT
+noinst_DATA += $(docbook:.xml=.txt)
+%.txt: %.xml $(chapters)
+ $(AM_V_GEN)$(XMLTO) $(XMLTO_HTML_FLAGS) txt $
+endif HAVE_XMLTO_TEXT
^^^
On 09/15/11 04:41 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Actually, it looks like a bunch of drivers are not linking correctly to begin
with, and nobody seems so have cared.
The Solaris linker does, and I've long added a bunch of libraries to my
LDFLAGS for each driver on Solaris. If we're now
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net wrote:
Patch produced with:
unifdef -UNO_INLINE -B
This change isn't relevant to the similar code in
xfree86/common/compiler.h, because x86emu is expected to someday move
out of xserver entirely and so should not depend on
This patch produced with:
for f in `git grep -Fwl USEMGAHAL`; do
unifdef -B -UUSEMGAHAL $f | sponge $f
done
Adam Jackson wrote:
Hey, so, remember back in the dark ages when dualhead was this
insanely wild differentiating feature? Matrox thought it
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One thing I found frustrating about the discussion was that we
didn't have a whiteboard nor a list of the pros cons of such a
change. So I'd like to capture that here (from memory) to let us
continue the discussion about
On Don, 2011-09-15 at 10:45 -0500, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Pros:
1) easier to propagate API changes across drivers (just like Linux)
1a) thus easier to change ABI
2) developers focused on driver development now have more incentive
to make sure the server works well so regular
Somehow the title got changed during troff to docbook conversion.
Latest troff version:
ftp://www.x.org/pub/X11R7.0/doc/PDF/XiLib.pdf
Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca
---
specs/inputlib.xml |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 14/09/2011 00:09, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
This is confusing to me. Why do you add the extra ; echo '** mkfontdir'?
On Sep 12, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
+AC_DEFUN([XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR],[
+ if test x$cross_compiling != xno ; then
+ AC_PATH_PROG(MKFONTDIR,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One thing I found frustrating about the discussion was that we
didn't have a whiteboard nor a list of the pros cons of such a
change. So
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One thing I found frustrating about the discussion was that we
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:34:51 -0400, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
The number of ABI breaks is minimal (usually 1 per
xserver) and those can usually be fixed within a day or so of the
breakage.
We don't get ABI changes because they're nearly impossible to handle.
I don't rebuild
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Globals.c |1 -
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Privstr.h |2 --
hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/alpha_video.c |2 +-
hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/arm_video.c |6 +++---
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c
b/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c
index e5c8495..84c6b3d 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c | 23 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c
b/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c
index 84c6b3d..1825672
OpenBSD and NetBSD does not support syscons
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c |4
hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_OSlib.h | 20
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_OSlib.h | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_OSlib.h
b/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_OSlib.h
index cf92821..fddde8a 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c
b/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c
index a0caee3..c8a4e05 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Config.c | 13 -
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Globals.c|1 -
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Privstr.h|1 -
hw/xfree86/man/xorg.conf.man | 12
Ok, then this gets my structural review, but would be nice if someone who
really understands docbook looks at invocation.
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 02:35 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
For me personally, I don't seem much advantage in moving the drivers
into the xserver. The number of ABI breaks is minimal (usually 1 per
xserver) and those can usually be fixed within a day or so of the
breakage. I don't rebuild the
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
3) Out of tree drivers will become second class citizens.
I don't see that as a con. I see that as a benefit. If something is not in
the tree, it IS a second class citizen, and users should not expect it to work
any more. If the trident
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 14/09/2011 00:09, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
This is confusing to me. Why do you add the extra ; echo '** mkfontdir'?
On Sep 12, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
+AC_DEFUN([XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR],[
+ if test x$cross_compiling != xno ;
3) Out of tree drivers will become second class citizens.
I don't see that as a con. I see that as a benefit. If something is not in
the tree, it IS a second class citizen, and users should not expect it to
work any more. If the trident driver breaks, they can always use vesa.
This
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:20:21PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_bell.c |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
Based purely on code inspection, this patch looks right to me.
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:20:22PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Globals.c |1 -
Again, based purely on code inspection, this looks right.
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:20:23PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/bsd_init.c |5 +
1 files
On Thursday 15 of September 2011, Jesse Barnes wrote:
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One thing I found frustrating about the discussion was that we
didn't have a whiteboard nor a list of the pros cons of such a
change. So I'd like to capture that
It wasn't immediately obvious to me that the comment (stdin is already
closed, so this won't work) was actually true. I've confirmed that the
other comment is true (stdin is already closed in OsInit()), so I
believe this patch is correct. I'd like to see some explanation in the
commit message,
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 15 of September 2011, Jesse Barnes wrote:
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One thing I found frustrating about the discussion was that we
didn't have a whiteboard nor a list of the
I review this in the sense that the comments match the src changes and look
well formed. Hopefully another BSD developer can vouch for whether they
actually do the right thing rather than just do the stated thing
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:20 PM,
It looks to me like you should also delete VTSYSRQ from
hw/xfree86/parser/xf86tokens.h.
If you fix that,
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
I can't review the remaining patches in this series because I'm not
familiar enough with the BSDs.
Jamey
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:20:28PM
On Thursday 15 of September 2011, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 15 of September 2011, Jesse Barnes wrote:
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One thing I found frustrating about the
This test would fail at, for example, depth 8 because indexed color
comparisons are not implemented in rendercheck yet. This commit
workarounds this by passing the test if indexed picture formats are
used.
Signed-off-by: Damien Leone dle...@nvidia.com
Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner
On 09/15/2011 01:00 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 15 of September 2011, Jesse Barnes wrote:
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One thing I found frustrating about the discussion was
Le 15/09/2011 17:45, Jesse Barnes a écrit :
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One thing I found frustrating about the discussion was that we
didn't have a whiteboard nor a list of the pros cons of such a
change. So I'd like to capture that here (from
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:18 -0500, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Ok, then this gets my structural review, but would be nice if someone who
really understands docbook looks at invocation.
I would love to as well. However, from a risk management perspective,
this new version is mainly a reshuffle of
On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 09/15/2011 01:00 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 15 of September 2011, Jesse Barnes wrote:
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree. One
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 06:05:46PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
At XDC this week we discussed merging drivers back into the server
tree.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:34:51 -0400, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
wrote:
The number of ABI breaks is minimal (usually 1 per
xserver) and those can usually be fixed within a day or so of the
breakage.
We don't get
Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com
Thanks for doing this, it was bugging me that we couldn't wrap these
functions at this level.
Only somewhat related, but what do you think of the idea of creating RENDER
path objects to allow clients to shove entire path descriptions over to the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
Pros:
1) easier to propagate API changes across drivers (just like Linux)
1a) thus easier to change ABI
I suppose that's true. How often are we breaking the ABI though? How
often do we break the ABI and it
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:37:01 -0700, Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com wrote:
Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com
Thanks for doing this, it was bugging me that we couldn't wrap these
functions at this level.
Only somewhat related, but what do you think of the idea of creating
On 09/15/2011 02:41 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Pros:
1) easier to propagate API changes across drivers (just like Linux)
1a) thus easier to change ABI
I suppose that's true. How often are we breaking the ABI
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 01:30:02PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
Personally, I would prefer a monolithic tree with separate branches for
backporting driver changes to older server versions. I would also prefer
each driver having a stated policy of how many back revisions of servers
are supported
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 10:07 -0500, Jamey Sharp wrote:
configure --with-int10=yes is not a valid configuration, and the check
It depends what is the definition of valid in this context. Running
./configure --with-int10 will set INT10 to yes. You may choose to
ignore this value. I can only guess
On 09/15/11 09:01, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
Somehow the title got changed during troff to docbook conversion.
Latest troff version:
ftp://www.x.org/pub/X11R7.0/doc/PDF/XiLib.pdf
Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadonmems...@videotron.ca
---
specs/inputlib.xml |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
The developer docs are generated from a subset of docbook.am
which is sometimes updated.
The one difference for xserver is the embedded css style in the HEAD element.
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca
---
devbook.am | 45
On 09/15/11 08:45, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Cons:
1) more work for distros to backport just driver changes to old
servers (especially if people follow through on (3) above)
1a) if backporting is harder, new hardware support will be more
difficult to land in enterprise level
On 09/15/11 14:41, Matt Turner wrote:
4) increased test coverage for the server as users wanting current
driver code will be building new servers too
Maybe. I'd hate to force users to do that just to get new hardware
support or a simple driver bug fix.
The server will often require
On 09/15/11 14:01, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 09/15/2011 01:00 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
From distro package maintainer point of view I _love_ split drivers. It's so
much easier
On 09/15/11 13:07, Jamey Sharp wrote:
It looks to me like you should also delete VTSYSRQ from
hw/xfree86/parser/xf86tokens.h.
Please ensure that any changes result in the X server simply ignoring
the VTSysReq option in existing xorg.conf and not erroring out refusing
to start on a file that
On 09/15/11 05:57, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
A couple of things to verify:
* OpenBSD still uses libtool 1.5
So does Solaris - 1.5.22, though I have a local install of 2.2
I usually use for building X.Org modules from git.
I don't think that's an issue though, as -module has worked fine
for us
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/ramdac/Makefile.am b/hw/xfree86/ramdac/Makefile.am
index 3c37805..d29ded5 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/ramdac/Makefile.am
+++ b/hw/xfree86/ramdac/Makefile.am
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libramdac.la
+libramdac_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version
On 09/14/11 15:25, Aaron Plattner wrote:
These symbols were not renamed when they were added to libfb:
# nm -D libwfb.so | grep ' fb'
00028d00 T fbTrapezoids
00028d60 T fbTriangles
This causes corruption and/or crashes on wfb-ful drivers like nvidia:
Is there any
On 09/14/11 09:11, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:39:53AM -0500, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/14/11 10:07 AM, Jamey Sharp wrote:
configure --with-int10=yes is not a valid configuration, and the check
for sys/vm86.h and sys/io.h is not used. Delete it.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 07:28:25PM -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 10:07 -0500, Jamey Sharp wrote:
configure --with-int10=yes is not a valid configuration, and the check
It depends what is the definition of valid in this context. Running
./configure --with-int10 will set
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:36:51 +1000, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
wrote:
void
NewCurrentScreen(DeviceIntPtr pDev, ScreenPtr newScreen, int x, int y)
{
-SpritePtr pSprite = pDev-spriteInfo-sprite;
+DeviceIntPtr ptr;
+SpritePtr pSprite;
+
+ptr = IsFloating(pDev)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 06:42:59PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/15/11 13:07, Jamey Sharp wrote:
It looks to me like you should also delete VTSYSRQ from
hw/xfree86/parser/xf86tokens.h.
Please ensure that any changes result in the X server simply ignoring
the VTSysReq option in
On 09/15/11 20:51, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 06:42:59PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/15/11 13:07, Jamey Sharp wrote:
It looks to me like you should also delete VTSYSRQ from
hw/xfree86/parser/xf86tokens.h.
Please ensure that any changes result in the X server simply
On 09/11/11 14:08, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
Puts the statement on a single line, using commas to separate years
-- Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1996 X Consortium
As opposed to 3 double-spaced lines.
Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadonmems...@videotron.ca
---
doc/ICElib.xml |7 ---
1 files
On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote:
+# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR()
+# ---
+# Minimum version: 1.1.1
Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released 1.2.0?
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window
On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Since the cache files produced by fc-cache are arch-dependent, there is
no point in running fc-cache if cross-compiling
So, even if we aren't using a DESTDIR, but are installing directly into
(a hopefully non-default) prefix, don't run fc-cache when
If you're talking enterprise distros though, that means committing to at
least one long-term support stable branch, that you backport new driver
support to
for years, not just the 6 months until the next one.
Just a note from an enterprise distro maintainer, we are currently
rebasing the X
Ah good catch. Removed in my tree.
On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/ramdac/Makefile.am b/hw/xfree86/ramdac/Makefile.am
index 3c37805..d29ded5 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/ramdac/Makefile.am
+++ b/hw/xfree86/ramdac/Makefile.am
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/14/11 15:25, Aaron Plattner wrote:
These symbols were not renamed when they were added to libfb:
# nm -D libwfb.so | grep ' fb'
00028d00 T fbTrapezoids
00028d60 T fbTriangles
This causes corruption and/or
80 matches
Mail list logo
