On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 02:41, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 12-01-04 09:38 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 15:33, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 12-01-04 04:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
While I have the attention of someone versed in buildsystem-fu:
On 12-01-04 09:38 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 15:33, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 12-01-04 04:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
While I have the attention of someone versed in buildsystem-fu:
intel-gpu-tools also contains a set of tests for the i915 kernel module
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:12:16PM -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
This module is hosted as an X.Org app and is published as such.
This patch adds some missing packaging files and sets some basic
infrastructure
common to all xorg modules which saves maintenance in the long run.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 15:33, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 12-01-04 04:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
While I have the attention of someone versed in buildsystem-fu:
intel-gpu-tools also contains a set of tests for the i915 kernel module
(and the libdrm interface for it). Currently
On 01/04/12 06:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Originally we've abused make check, but that turned out to be a bad
idea because make distcheck automatically runs that. And the tests
check the kernel and not intel-gpu-tools itself, so that didn't make
much sense. Hence we added make test with a quick
On 01/04/2012 08:39 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 01/04/12 06:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Originally we've abused make check, but that turned out to be a bad
idea because make distcheck automatically runs that. And the tests
check the kernel and not intel-gpu-tools itself, so that didn't make
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 18:12, Matt Dew mar...@osource.org wrote:
This is the same 'make check' that the tinderbox uses right?
Thread: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-January/028225.html
Forgive me if I'm being dumb here. My thought, on pretty much no sleep last
night, is should
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 16:39, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
On 01/04/12 06:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
One thing I'm wondering is whether we could easily ship these tests in
some form, so that users could run them from the distro package
instead of grabbing the sources.
On 01/04/2012 10:26 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 18:12, Matt Dewmar...@osource.org wrote:
This is the same 'make check' that the tinderbox uses right?
Thread: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-January/028225.html
Forgive me if I'm being dumb here. My thought, on
This module is hosted as an X.Org app and is published as such.
This patch adds some missing packaging files and sets some basic infrastructure
common to all xorg modules which saves maintenance in the long run.
http://www.x.org/wiki/NewModuleGuidelines
This series applies some xorg project
10 matches
Mail list logo
