Markus Gutschke wrote (in a message from Monday 9)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Sep 9 18:36:13 [kernel] PAX: terminating task:
> > /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86(XFree86):23363, uid/euid: 0/0, EIP: 08247BB8, ESP:
> > BFF31D0C
> > o
> >
> > So it IS the kernel's fault. Google says PAX controls s
Has anyone heard of problems with running applications for nearly a year, without
restart of server or application? We get a crash after 248.5 days, which seems to
coincide with 2**31 * 10ms.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ralph Nilsson
___
Xpert mailing list
David,
Just a little FYI, the one thing that is very important is that any memory
allocation scheme in agpgart forces the pages to be in the 32-bit pci
addressable range. I haven't looked at pci_alloc_consistent() at all, but
as long as it ensures that, and that the pages will never swap
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 07:45:16PM -0700, Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
>
>David,
> You may want to consider changing the alloc_page to use
>pci_alloc_consistent()
>as is done in Alan Cox's version of the drm's. I changed the i810 one to do
>that
>in a patch sent to the drm list a couple weeks ago (D
David,
You may want to consider changing the alloc_page to use
pci_alloc_consistent()
as is done in Alan Cox's version of the drm's. I changed the i810 one to do
that
in a patch sent to the drm list a couple weeks ago (Doesn't seem to be
applied,
I thought Jens was applying it). It looks like
I've just committed a major rework of the i830/i845G support in the i810
driver. It's available from the XFree86 CVS trunk. If you had problems
with the previous version, try this one.
This version works best with the 2.4.19 kernel (or later). I've also
done a little testing of this driver on
On 11 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le mar 10/09/2002 à 23:10, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
> > On 10 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> >
> > > Le mar 10/09/2002 à 21:33, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
> > >
> > > >If the primary card doesn't work when there's another (unused) card
> > > > in the
Le mar 10/09/2002 à 23:10, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
> On 10 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>
> > Le mar 10/09/2002 à 21:33, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
> >
> > >If the primary card doesn't work when there's another (unused) card
> > > in the system, then it's probably a RAC bug or a bug with t
> Hi,
>
> I was writing an XF86Config parser from scratch, when I noticed there's
> a python wrapper for this...
> However, I'm writing my tool in c++, so I need the C source... I found a
> file called xf86Parser.h, but couldn't find any documentation about
> it...
>
> Is this the right file, a
Hi,
I picked up a web pad (a ProGear) that had Xfree86 3.3.6
on it. They had a roll-your-own touchscreen solution that
was partially based around the MuTouch drivers. The
MuTouch drivers are actually functional, but can't be
calibrated correctly - there's always some misalignment
near th
I have. Take a look at:
http://xnee.sourceforge.net/
/hesa
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 01:14, Preetham wrote:
> Hi All:
> I am trying to capture the Requests sent to the X server.
> I am using the RECORD Extension. I would like to know if anybody has
> written or used the recordlib Library t
On 10 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le mar 10/09/2002 à 21:33, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
>
> >If the primary card doesn't work when there's another (unused) card
> > in the system, then it's probably a RAC bug or a bug with the primary
> > card driver's RAC settings. Though it's possibl
HI!
Feel free to contact me, please use the following adress:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am __TRYING__ to release Xnee 0.8 next week, so if you got any
proposals or even bugs.. send them ASAP!
Best regards,
Henrik Sandklef (author of Xnee)
/hesa
On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 17:04, Alex
Hi All:
I am trying to capture the Requests sent to
the X server.
I am using the RECORD Extension. I would like to
know if anybody has written or used the recordlib Library to write such a
client.
The place i am getting stuck is in the
XRecordInterceptProc handler part.
Thanks,
Preetham
Le mar 10/09/2002 à 21:33, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
>If the primary card doesn't work when there's another (unused) card
> in the system, then it's probably a RAC bug or a bug with the primary
> card driver's RAC settings. Though it's possible that it's just
> a motherboard bios bug, like
I suspect only the notebook cards support dualhead. i don't have a any
r128 cards; I wrote this patch by cross referencing the radeon driver.
however, I don't have the r128 docs, so I had to guess on much of the
register poking, so alot of that is probably wrong. If someone out
there has an r12
Le mar 10/09/2002 à 21:33, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
>If the primary card doesn't work when there's another (unused) card
> in the system, then it's probably a RAC bug or a bug with the primary
> card driver's RAC settings. Though it's possible that it's just
> a motherboard bios bug, like m
On 10 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le mar 10/09/2002 à 20:00, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
> > On 10 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> >
> > > >This sounds like maybe a RAC problem, or perhaps a driver problem
> > > > with the RAC settings. Were you able to do "XFree86 -probeonly"
> > > > w
Try adding
Option "ChipId 0x4243"
To the device section of /etc/XF86Config
Vladimir Dergachev
On 10 Sep 2002, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have ATI Radeon 9000 Powered by ATI (made by Sapphire).
> It has only analog (monitor) and s-video output, no dvi,
Le mar 10/09/2002 à 20:00, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
> On 10 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>
> > >This sounds like maybe a RAC problem, or perhaps a driver problem
> > > with the RAC settings. Were you able to do "XFree86 -probeonly"
> > > without crashing? If so, can you post the /var/log
Hi,
I was writing an XF86Config parser from scratch, when I noticed there's
a python wrapper for this...
However, I'm writing my tool in c++, so I need the C source... I found a
file called xf86Parser.h, but couldn't find any documentation about
it...
Is this the right file, and if so, where ca
On 10 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> >This sounds like maybe a RAC problem, or perhaps a driver problem
> > with the RAC settings. Were you able to do "XFree86 -probeonly"
> > without crashing? If so, can you post the /var/log/XFree86.0.log?
>
> X -probeonly works well (log attached), a
ah i have a similar problem. I try to run an
diamond stealth 64 vram with an IBM RGB526CF ramdac chip
together with an onboard ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT]
(rev 154)
when i have my ati card as screen0 X won't start with an message
(II) Loading sub module "vgahw"
(II) LoadMo
Hi,
I have ATI Radeon 9000 Powered by ATI (made by Sapphire).
It has only analog (monitor) and s-video output, no dvi,
64M of RAM.
Unfortunately current radeon drivers does not have PCI ID of
this card (afaik even in xfree cvs).
How can I force radeon driver to service this card (hope it
will
Which card do you have ? I don't recall r128 cards supporting two heads..
With the exception of notebook chipsets. (Note: TV-out does not count).
Vladimir Dergachev
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I don't suppose someone out there with r128 docs would fill
I am running a Diamond Viper II Z200 which is based on the Savage 2000
chipset. It works fine to start X normally, but if I use a piece of
software to view Multimedia, ie: xine, it scrambles the video. I know
that it has something to do with the Card, cuz I have tried a 3dfx
Voodoo3 and it works
I don't suppose someone out there with r128 docs would fill me in on
how the second head is controlled on r128. with that info I will try
and refine my patches. as commented in r128_reg.h in the crtc2 section
are all the crtc2 regs listed? or were some left out? also have is the
DAC, cursor and
complete log
XFree86 Version 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-0pre1v1 20020907203049 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) / X
Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 3 September 2002
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above da
Resent without the complete X log (message too big)
Le mar 10/09/2002 à 00:51, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
> On 10 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>
> > Le mar 10/09/2002 à 00:09, Mark Vojkovich a écrit :
> > > > I dunno if I've been clear, but I even tried with only one driver at a
> > > > time (NV
29 matches
Mail list logo
