Le mar 22/10/2002 à 00:30, David Dawes a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote:
Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large
open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it
is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 05:14:28PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:38:22AM +0100, Philip Blacker wrote:
I'm wondering if it's feasible for the kernel to route ACPI power
[...]
Does it make a difference if you switch to a text VT before initiating
a suspend? That's
Hello,
Is it possible for me to write a wrapper or a hook to
the Xserver,so that all the X calls, instead of going
to Xserver, will land into my application and my
application will inturn pass them to the X server for
further processing.
If yes, how ?
thanks,
Anurag
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:20:05AM -0700, Anurag Palsule wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible for me to write a wrapper or a hook to
the Xserver,so that all the X calls, instead of going
to Xserver, will land into my application and my
application will inturn pass them to the X server for
further
Title: RE: [Xpert]Re: Status of Radeon support under XFree86
I tried installing the binary
distribution of the radeon dri module, as found on the dri-sf
page, but
that gave me another signal 11.
As far as i read discussion here and on dri-devel,
there was a problem with similar effect,
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 08:15, Kacper Wysocki wrote:
I'm really trying to avoid having to
compile XF86 myself, since I've heard it's not the most fun thing to
do on a Saturday nite.
There are some good step-by-step instructions at
http://blfs.linuxfromscratch.org and
On Die, 2002-10-22 at 08:15, Kacper Wysocki wrote:
From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
super-slow! What gives? I did have trouble loading glx earlier, but
I
traced this problem to my enabling of the radeon framebuffer device
in
the kernel.
Huh? Must have
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 16:44, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On 21 Oct 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2002-10-20 at 23:57, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Boris wrote:
Hmm, Seems to be alot of problems in the CVS the last few days. Heres
the latest one.
On 22 Oct 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
That the new header is being picked up seems the only viable explanantion
for the reported symptom. How it got there is irrelevant. Perhaps
re-installing glibc from source re-syncs the headers, I don't know. Or,
possibly, this system simply does not
On Die, 2002-10-22 at 14:23, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On 22 Oct 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
That the new header is being picked up seems the only viable explanantion
for the reported symptom. How it got there is irrelevant. Perhaps
re-installing glibc from source re-syncs the
Hello,
I' trying to execute the X windows on a m/c using XF86_FBDev driver and
linnux 2.4
CS5530 graphics chipset
Frame buffer support with 16bit color depth
It gives me the first blank screen with crossed cursor and hangs there.The error is undefined symbol XmuCvtGravityToString while loading
Martin van Es wrote:
Hi,
Let me first apologize for posting a newbie question that may have been
covered before (I did search the archives and I did find some references
to it, but thusfar was not able to solve my problem).
I am a little ashamed (and spoilt) to admit that X is running like a
Hi,
I am still having problems with my ATI Radeon 64 MB DDR VIVO Card and TV-Out
on a Samsung SyncMaster 753DF and connected to my television via an S-Video
Cable.
Whenever the TV-Out is enabled by the BIOS or atitvout, the Computer Monitor
Loses Sync and displays Sync Out of Range at
On 22 Oct 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
That the new header is being picked up seems the only viable explanantion
for the reported symptom. How it got there is irrelevant. Perhaps
re-installing glibc from source re-syncs the headers, I don't know. Or,
possibly, this system simply does not
On Die, 2002-10-22 at 16:55, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On 22 Oct 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
That the new header is being picked up seems the only viable explanantion
for the reported symptom. How it got there is irrelevant. Perhaps
re-installing glibc from source re-syncs the
On 22 Oct 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, this issue is closed until such a time when the
kernel folk again rename something they shouldn't.
Can't you see that the kernel folks can do whatever they want, so long
as people use a sane setup where there are no kernel
I think the easiest way to do what you are suggesting would be to run
a proxy (your hook) that listens on the usual X socket (either TCP
or UNIX). Then, run the X server on a non-standard port, and forward
all the packets in both directions through your proxy.
This assumes, first of all, that
On Die, 2002-10-22 at 17:34, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On 22 Oct 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, this issue is closed until such a time when the
kernel folk again rename something they shouldn't.
Can't you see that the kernel folks can do whatever they want, so
Hi all,
I'm testing out some terminal escape sequences as in:
http://cns.georgetown.edu/~ric/howto/Xterm-Title/ctlseqs.txt
Just try typing: echo -ne \033[2t into an xterm;)
Anyway, how can i type control sequences into an xterm
without the cursor moving? When i press ESC, it gets
intercepted
Le mar 22/10/2002 à 18:12, Russell a écrit :
Hi all,
I'm testing out some terminal escape sequences as in:
http://cns.georgetown.edu/~ric/howto/Xterm-Title/ctlseqs.txt
Just try typing: echo -ne \033[2t into an xterm;)
Anyway, how can i type control sequences into an xterm
without the
On 22 Oct 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
glibc's /usr/include/linux/kd.h ultimately hails from the kernel's
include/linux/kd.h. The field name change was propagated through this
system's upgrade to a bleeding edge glibc.
Less bleeding edge than the kernel it was built against, apparently, or
I am trying to put together a linux system that will drive 4 to 6 heads
for use in an transportation operations center. I am using Redhat 7.3,
xfree86 4.2.0, and the xfree86 drivers from the Matrox site.
I can get one card with 2 heads to work if the card is configured to be
the primary video
Does XFree86 video driver support VBlank(Vsync)
interrupt? If it does, how to enable it?
I know some librarys offer function calls to sync
to Vsync (linke SDL_Flip), butthey use
polling instead Vsync interrupt. The performance
suffers a lot.
I did some experiment by probing the vidoe
From: Gregg Lebovitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 22 Oct 2002 16:39:09 -0400
I am trying to put together a linux system that will drive 4 to 6 heads
for use in an transportation operations center. I am using Redhat 7.3,
xfree86 4.2.0, and the xfree86 drivers from the
I have a Thinkpad 760XL, with a trident chipset and
800x600 flatscreen. The BIOS is not upgraded to the
latest and greatest (I guess that shouldnt really
affect native drivers in any way, at most it could add
some VESA functionality?) since there is no battery in
this, and that is required for a
Kim,
I am seeing similar problems on a redhat system, but mine are much
worse. As far as I can tell, the G450 cards work okay as the primary
video controller, but present garbage on the screen when used as a
secondary controller.
All my cards are PCI. The 2 heads connected to the primary
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Tony Wu wrote:
Does XFree86 video driver support VBlank(Vsync) interrupt? If it does,
how to enable it?
XFree86 drivers are user-space drivers, and as such cannot
service interrupts. Only the kernel can handle interrupts.
Since most XFree86 drivers do not have a
On Die, 2002-10-22 at 23:12, Tony Wu wrote:
Does XFree86 video driver support VBlank(Vsync) interrupt? If it does, how to enable
it?
I know some librarys offer function calls to sync to Vsync (linke SDL_Flip), but
they use
polling instead Vsync interrupt. The performance suffers a lot.
I
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:25:40AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:54:26PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 02:12:30PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Wojciech Kasprzak wrote:
The application used to work under Linux 7.1. Has
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 05:14:28PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:38:22AM +0100, Philip Blacker wrote:
I'm wondering if it's feasible for the kernel to route ACPI power
[...]
Does it make a difference if
Around 22 o'clock on Oct 22, David Dawes wrote:
-no-render-extension / NoRenderExtension
-render-extension (for cancelling a NoRenderExtension option in
XF86Config)
Might shorten these to '-norender' and '-render'. However, I'd argue that
Render should be considered
Search on xscope. There was a thread on this not long ago.
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 04:20 US/Eastern, Anurag Palsule wrote:
Is it possible for me to write a wrapper or a hook to
the Xserver,so that all the X calls, instead of going
to Xserver, will land into my application and my
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:08:24PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
Around 22 o'clock on Oct 22, David Dawes wrote:
-no-render-extension / NoRenderExtension
-render-extension (for cancelling a NoRenderExtension option in
XF86Config)
Might shorten these to '-norender' and
Quoting P.R. Patil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
colorparam0100,0100,0100/paramHello,
I' trying to execute the X windows on a m/c using
XF86_FBDev driver and
linnux 2.4
CS5530 graphics chipset
Frame buffer support with 16bit color
Around 23 o'clock on Oct 22, David Dawes wrote:
If it can be run in a mode where no colours other than black or white are
allocated, then that'd be OK. It needs to be possible to have a
configuration where legacy pseudocolor-only clients can run without
interference. I can't think of too
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:59:34AM -0400, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
David == David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Unless the old Type1 backend can unreservedly be replaced by
David the new FreeType2 backend, then it should be disabled, and
David maybe even a fake type1 font module created
36 matches
Mail list logo
