ECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xpert]Hooking onto Xserver
>
>
> I configured my X server to use the frame buffer
> devices. Now how do I make sure that the X server
> that
> is running
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Xpert]Hooking onto Xserver
I configured my X server to use the frame buffer
devices. Now how do I make sure that the X server that
is running on my system is actually the
I configured my X server to use the frame buffer
devices. Now how do I make sure that the X server that
is running on my system is actually the framebuffer X
server, and is using the fb device that I have
specified in the FRAMEBUFFER environment variable.
Also when I remove the frame buffer device
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:05:34AM -0800, Anurag Palsule wrote:
> Any idea how to implement such kind of approach.
>
You said in the archives:
> Actually, what my requirement is to get the
> coordinates of the rectangular portion on the desktop
> that has changed. Comparing the screens would be a
Any idea how to implement such kind of approach.
Anurag
--- Ricardo Baratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that'd definitely depend on your code. afaik
> (conceptually) there's nothing
> there that's specific to any kind of machine.
>
> ricardo
>
> At some point in the past you ("Anurag Palsule"
that'd definitely depend on your code. afaik (conceptually) there's nothing
there that's specific to any kind of machine.
ricardo
At some point in the past you ("Anurag Palsule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) said:
> But will such an approach won't be portable across
> different platforms, hardware and fl
But will such an approach won't be portable across
different platforms, hardware and flavours of linux ??
- Anurag
--- Ricardo Baratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hooking onto the Xserver might affect the
> performance,
> > Can I go one level below the x server, sit
> somewhere
> > in between
> Hooking onto the Xserver might affect the performance,
> Can I go one level below the x server, sit somewhere
> in between the X server and the display driver ?
>
yes, look at what xf4vnc does (xf4vnc.sourceforge.net).
For what you want it's probably the best approach. You'll probably
want to re
Thanks for that information,
Actually, what my requirement is to get the
coordinates of the rectangular portion on the desktop
that has changed. Comparing the screens would be a
heavy task. So I am looking for an approach that will
keep giving me the coordinates of the changed
rectangles.
Hookin
Search on "xscope". There was a thread on this not long ago.
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 04:20 US/Eastern, Anurag Palsule wrote:
Is it possible for me to write a wrapper or a hook to
the Xserver,so that all the X calls, instead of going
to Xserver, will land into my application and my
applicati
I think the easiest way to do what you are suggesting would be to run
a "proxy" (your hook) that listens on the usual X socket (either TCP
or UNIX). Then, run the X server on a non-standard port, and forward
all the packets in both directions through your proxy.
This assumes, first of all, that
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:20:05AM -0700, Anurag Palsule wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible for me to write a wrapper or a hook to
> the Xserver,so that all the X calls, instead of going
> to Xserver, will land into my application and my
> application will inturn pass them to the X server for
> fu
Hello,
Is it possible for me to write a wrapper or a hook to
the Xserver,so that all the X calls, instead of going
to Xserver, will land into my application and my
application will inturn pass them to the X server for
further processing.
If yes, how ?
thanks,
Anurag
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
