Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-09 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > Please don't post this anymore. I'd rather see the full > /var/log/XFree86.0.log. Ummm, with the exception of the top and bottom boilerplate, I cut and pasted that directly from the /var/log/XFree86.0.log I learned my lesson from the last time

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-09 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > Well, XFree86 looks like it gets further, but now it has a different > failure message: > XFree86 Version 4.2.99.1 / X Window System > (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) > Release Date: 26 September 2002 > If the serve

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-09 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
Well, XFree86 looks like it gets further, but now it has a different failure message: XFree86 Version 4.2.99.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) Release Date: 26 September 2002 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > I'm now running with an aperture driver generated with gcc 3.2, and have > updated the shell archive for the aperture driver accordingly. Well, "make install" didn't quite do all the required tricks, but I eventually muddled my way through. Nex

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-07 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Joshua Symons wrote: > > gcc 3.2 which happens to actually be quite clean on solaris at this > > point does indeed default to 32 bit, requiring the -m64 switch to > > compile 64 bit code. > OK. I'll verify this and make the

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-02 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Joshua Symons wrote: > > > > This is the problem. Please read point 1. of section 4. in > > > > README.Solaris. You need to install the aperture driver. > > > Argh. Somehow my brain managed to mangle the meaning of the third > > > paragraph. I think it was the mention of

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-02 Thread Joshua Symons
ct: Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100? > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > > > > This is the problem. Please read point 1. of section 4. in > > > README.Solaris. You need to install the aperture driver. > > > Argh. Somehow my brain man

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-02 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > > This is the problem. Please read point 1. of section 4. in > > README.Solaris. You need to install the aperture driver. > Argh. Somehow my brain managed to mangle the meaning of the third > paragraph. I think it was the mention of "Solaris

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-02 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > This is the problem. Please read point 1. of section 4. in > README.Solaris. You need to install the aperture driver. Argh. Somehow my brain managed to mangle the meaning of the third paragraph. I think it was the mention of "Solaris x86 2.5

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-02 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > > Besides, I see no complaint here about the other drivers that are in the > > same boat (e.g. newport, i740, etc). So, what problem did including i810 > > cause? > Some form of missing header, I think. If I get this all working, I'll go > back

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-02 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > Besides, I see no complaint here about the other drivers that are in the > same boat (e.g. newport, i740, etc). So, what problem did including i810 > cause? Some form of missing header, I think. If I get this all working, I'll go back to the b

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-10-01 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > After deleting the i810 and i830 drivers (these *really* should be > autodetected as not available when being built under Solaris) from my > setup, XFree86 actually completely builds and installs. I'll assume you've read my cursory comment about

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-09-30 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
After deleting the i810 and i830 drivers (these *really* should be autodetected as not available when being built under Solaris) from my setup, XFree86 actually completely builds and installs. However, it doesn't detect any PCI interface at all. What obvious thing did I miss? -a XFree86 Versio

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-09-27 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > Has anyone managed to get XFree86 to work on a Sun Blade > 100/150/1000/2000 running Solaris? > It doesn't necessarily need to work with a Sun graphics card; I would > happily go get even a reasonably expensive ATI or nVidia card (which would >

[Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

2002-09-26 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
Has anyone managed to get XFree86 to work on a Sun Blade 100/150/1000/2000 running Solaris? It doesn't necessarily need to work with a Sun graphics card; I would happily go get even a reasonably expensive ATI or nVidia card (which would *still* be much cheaper than anything from Sun). -a __