Le mer. 20 sept. 2023 à 22:37, Richard Purdie
a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 18:48 +0200, Julien Stephan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In the scope of the RFQ, I am currently looking at bug #14737 (adding
> > support of PEP-517 in recipetool/devtool).
> >
> > I am quite new to the recipetool/dev
On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 18:48 +0200, Julien Stephan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the scope of the RFQ, I am currently looking at bug #14737 (adding
> support of PEP-517 in recipetool/devtool).
>
> I am quite new to the recipetool/devtool tools and I have several
> ideas I would like to discuss before go
Basically... yes, this is fine.
We don't really have anyone taking care of devtool/recipetool at the
moment or even knowing how the code works, so you have a lot of
freedom in how it can be improved, the only request from me is to add
tests to devtool and/or recipetool selftests for any new functi
Hi all,
In the scope of the RFQ, I am currently looking at bug #14737 (adding
support of PEP-517 in recipetool/devtool).
I am quite new to the recipetool/devtool tools and I have several
ideas I would like to discuss before going into development that may
not be appropriate/necessary for the tool
