Re: [yocto] [systemd-devel] How to automount

I think that sync just flushes data to disk and umount clears the dirty bit. There is no sync.vfat that I know. Em 23/09/2015 05:31, "Paul D. DeRocco" escreveu: > > From: Mike Looijmans > > > > This only serves to remove a mounted directory after > > "yanking" the device.

Re: [yocto] Does mount.cifs command includes in busybox package

HI Thanks Ross i saw cifs-utils recipe from openembedded ( from samba) provides mount.cifs command other than that any other package provides same command? thanks and regards vivek On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > mount.cifs is

Re: [yocto] Webkit2gtk opengl issue

On 23 September 2015 at 12:53, Mark O'Donovan wrote: > I am working on an am335x based project, with a webkitgtk > program on the screen, displaying a simple webpage. > > I want to use a standard yocto kernel, which I believe > means I must do without the SGX hardware

[yocto] Error in do_rootfs

Hi, To give you more detail,I am trying to add gstreamer-1.0 support in framework which is already having gstreamer-0.10. Now gstreamer binaries are built in Intel 80386 32 bit format,while my machine is amd,64 bit.So what i am doing i am configuring and compiling the gstreamer plugin packages

Re: [yocto] Error in do_rootfs

On 2015-09-23 06:13, Mayank Agarwal wrote: Hi, To give you more detail,I am trying to add gstreamer-1.0 support in framework which is already having gstreamer-0.10. Now gstreamer binaries are built in Intel 80386 32 bit format,while my machine is amd,64 bit.So what i am doing i am

[yocto] Webkit2gtk opengl issue

I am working on an am335x based project, with a webkitgtk program on the screen, displaying a simple webpage. I want to use a standard yocto kernel, which I believe means I must do without the SGX hardware acceleration until an open-source driver is available. Thus in fido I had added opengl to

Re: [yocto] Does mount.cifs command includes in busybox package

On 23 September 2015 at 11:31, Vivek Per wrote: > i saw cifs-utils recipe from openembedded ( from samba) > provides mount.cifs command other than that any other package provides same > command? > CIFS is "a bit" complex so Samba is the canonical implementation of

Re: [yocto] Does mount.cifs command includes in busybox package

mount.cifs is provided by Samba. Ross On 23 September 2015 at 10:56, Vivek Per wrote: > hi all, > Does mount.cifs command includes in busybox package . If so then it > includes what package > > PN= busybox > > > PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-httpd ${PN}-udhcpd ${PN}-udhcpc

[yocto] psplash wierdness

I have spent all morning fine tuning psplash on a PXE booting system using an NFS mounted root file system (all built with Yocto 1.8 for the intel-core2-32 machine) and all is exactly as I need. When I boot the system using an initrd of the same file system the first output from the init process

Re: [yocto] psplash wierdness

Your initrd is missing /dev/null device it seems. You need to create it dring build or some runtime mechanism On Sep 23, 2015 8:10 AM, "Andy Pont" wrote: > I have spent all morning fine tuning psplash on a PXE booting system using > an NFS mounted root file system (all

Re: [yocto] [systemd-devel] How to automount

> From: Daniel. [mailto:danielhi...@gmail.com] > > I think that sync just flushes data to disk and umount clears > the dirty bit. There is no sync.vfat that I know. That would seem to make auto-unmount (triggered by removal) an intrinsically unworkable concept. Or is that only the case for FAT

[yocto] [meta-mingw] gcc 5.2 partial patches

So I've got patches for meta-mingw which make it fail in an interesting way instead of in a boring way. http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=seebs/gcc52gw With these, we get past all the obvious not-even-applying, and blow up because one of the mingw headers complains that

Re: [yocto] [meta-mingw] gcc 5.2 partial patches

On 23 September 2015 at 20:33, Daniel. wrote: > I'm really curious, what that % means on recipe names? > It's a wildcard character that's only valid on bbappends: instead of needing to version accurately you can say recipe_1.%.bbappend to append to all 1.* versions of

Re: [yocto] [meta-mingw] gcc 5.2 partial patches

I'm really curious, what that % means on recipe names? Cheers, - dhs 2015-09-23 15:27 GMT-03:00 Peter Seebach : > So I've got patches for meta-mingw which make it fail in an interesting way > instead of in a boring way. > >

Re: [yocto] [systemd-devel] How to automount

I agree with you that is intrinsically unworkable, if there is no physical media, how can it be umounted!? If anyone make this possible, maybe some day, in that day, umounting will be obsolete. Cheers, - dhs 2015-09-23 15:31 GMT-03:00 Paul D. DeRocco : > > From: Daniel.

Re: [yocto] error in do_rootfs

bitbake -u depexp -g name segfault because of not gui environment you can get dpendency dot file using bitbake image-name -g. not bitbake bash -g I think that the problem is do_rootfs error cause is busybox when you create rootfs, it is stranged to create a bash link not /bin/sh >> Error:

Re: [yocto] [systemd-devel] How to automount

On 22-09-15 20:33, Fred Ollinger wrote: ... SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="remove" RUN+="/etc/udev/scripts/mount.sh" This only serves to remove a mounted directory after "yanking" the device. It doesn't really do anything useful though, you'll still get corrupted filesystems, because Linux is

Re: [yocto] [yocto-docs][PATCH] ref-manual: clarify allarch wrt RDPENDS and TUNE_PKGARCH

Hi, Is there anything wrong with this patch? Cheers, Andre' On 28 July 2015 at 09:04, wrote: > From: André Draszik > > See e.g. > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/64067 > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik >

Re: [yocto] [systemd-devel] How to automount

> From: Mike Looijmans > > This only serves to remove a mounted directory after > "yanking" the device. It > doesn't really do anything useful though, you'll still get corrupted > filesystems, because Linux is way too lazy in writing out dirty data. > > Proper solution would be to have the

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] rootfs fails

Hello guys, On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 01:12:25PM +, Edward Vidal wrote: >Hello All, >Thanks after doing "bitbake core-image-sato -c cleansstate" >followed by "bitbake core-image-sato" was able to get the image. >During the core-image-sato with no IMAGE_INSTALL_append = I did

Re: [yocto] psplash wierdness

Khem wrote... > Your initrd is missing /dev/null device it seems. You need to create it dring > build or > some runtime mechanism Hmmm, on further inspection it appears that in the /etc/rcS.d run level that psplash has been created as S00 while udev which is presumably going to create

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass: use existing ROOTFS_SIZE variable

Hello, On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 01:07:26PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > The ROOTFS_SIZE variable is already set to the aligned root filesystem size. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu > --- > classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass | 8 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/1] pi-blaster: Bump SRCREV

Hi, On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 08:27:16AM +0200, Petter Mabäcker wrote: > Update to latest revision in order to get rid of the integration patch > '0001-handle-install-data-hook-when-cross-compile.patch' that has been > submitted upstream. > > Changes since cd318cd63031a30249a4c08435b97263fa76d7b7:

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] du giving non-integer result?

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:14:21PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > On 11 September 2015 at 11:37, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > From the feedback, it looks like I'm the only one seeing this issue. > > That's okay, but I'll update this issue with new information in case > > it's

[yocto] X86 live image without persistence?

Under Yocto Fido, is it possible to build a live image that boots from a USB flash drive, but runs entirely out of a ramdisk, and has no persistent storage at all, booting the same clean image each time? I have a separate small partition for the limited amount of persistent storage that I need,

Re: [yocto] [meta-mingw] gcc 5.2 partial patches

Hmm, that's really useful. Thanks Burton! Regards, - dhs 2015-09-23 16:41 GMT-03:00 Burton, Ross : > > On 23 September 2015 at 20:33, Daniel. wrote: > >> I'm really curious, what that % means on recipe names? >> > > It's a wildcard character that's

[yocto] Does mount.cifs command includes in busybox package

hi all, Does mount.cifs command includes in busybox package . If so then it includes what package PN= busybox PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-httpd ${PN}-udhcpd ${PN}-udhcpc ${PN}-syslog ${PN}-mdev ${PN}-hwclock" in which package cifs command include If not does it includes in utils-linux package

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] rpi-config: fix setting decode_WVC1 in config.txt

Hello, On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:57:54PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: > On 16/08/2015 1:08 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote: > >Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu > >--- > > recipes-bsp/bootfiles/rpi-config_git.bb | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >diff --git

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH V3 2/5] userland: Add wayland support

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:51:38AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > backport and fix needed patches for supporting wayland-egl > use PACKAGECONFIG for wayland so we can add proper DEPENDS on wayland > Fix QA warnings about dev-so > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- >

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH V3 2/5] userland: Add wayland support

Andrei > On Sep 23, 2015, at 3:58 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:51:38AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> backport and fix needed patches for supporting wayland-egl >> use PACKAGECONFIG for wayland so we can add proper DEPENDS on wayland >> Fix QA warnings

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] du giving non-integer result?

On 09/23/15 16:12, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:14:21PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> On 11 September 2015 at 11:37, Trevor Woerner wrote: >>> From the feedback, it looks like I'm the only one seeing this issue. >>> That's okay, but I'll update this issue