On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 07:46 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 23:18 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
>> > On 06/30/2013 10:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> > > On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:33 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
>> > > > I c
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Michael Halstead
wrote:
> I can change the name shortly. Is there any reason to keep a read-only
> copy available at the current location temporarily?
It can't hurt, but I also can't think of a really compelling reason that it is
absolutely required. By the name al
I think the name is meta-yocto-kernel-extras. That is what I have pushed to
the docs.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: Hart, Darren
>Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:28 AM
>To: Richard Purdie
>Cc: Michael Halstead; Bruce Ashfield; Rifenbark, Scott M; yocto;
>Zanussi, Tom
>Subject: Re:
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 07:46 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 23:18 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> > On 06/30/2013 10:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:33 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> > > > I can change the name shortly. Is there any reason to keep a
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 23:18 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> On 06/30/2013 10:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:33 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> > > I can change the name shortly. Is there any reason to keep a read-only
> > > copy available at the current location temporaril
On 06/30/2013 10:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:33 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
>> I can change the name shortly. Is there any reason to keep a read-only
>> copy available at the current location temporarily?
> Not really. Unless Bruce is using it in some automated scripts
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:33 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> I can change the name shortly. Is there any reason to keep a read-only
> copy available at the current location temporarily?
Not really. Unless Bruce is using it in some automated scripts that need
to be updated.
--
Darren
>
> Michael
I can change the name shortly. Is there any reason to keep a read-only
copy available at the current location temporarily?
Michael Halstead
Yocto Project / Sys Admin
On 06/30/2013 10:19 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated the dev-manual section that tells the user what is in this r
Hi,
I updated the dev-manual section that tells the user what is in this repo and
shows an example of cloning it. Nothing changes except for the name, which I
switched to 'meta-yocto-kernel-extras'. To me, it appears that the contents of
the repo still contain the kernel BitBake append files
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 14:56 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 13-06-28 09:22 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> > > All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
> >
> > Personally, I'm fine with 'meta-yocto-kernel'. Naming things is
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-06-28 09:22 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> > All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
>
> Personally, I'm fine with 'meta-yocto-kernel'. Naming things is
> never easy, so I won't agonize over whether or not an "extras"
>
I would favor adding "extras" into the name then so there is no confusion over
it being the main thing.
>-Original Message-
>From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 6:41 AM
>To: Rifenbark, Scott M
>Cc: Richard Purdie; Hart, Darren; yocto; Mi
On 13-06-28 09:22 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
Personally, I'm fine with 'meta-yocto-kernel'. Naming things is
never easy, so I won't agonize over whether or not an "extras"
should be on the end. But the name should be clear that it isn't
th
All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 6:03 AM
>To: Richard Purdie
>Cc: Hart, Darren; yocto; Rifenbark, Scott M; Michael Halstead
>Subject: Re: poky-extras
>
>O
On 13-06-28 08:57 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 08:52 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-06-28 04:51 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Bruce/Darren,
My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 08:52 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-06-28 04:51 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Hi Bruce/Darren,
> >
> > My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
> > a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has come to
> > remove it. There a
On 13-06-28 04:51 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Bruce/Darren,
My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has come to
remove it. There are basically two chunks of code in there.
The meta-linaro pieces in there h
Hi Bruce/Darren,
My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has come to
remove it. There are basically two chunks of code in there.
The meta-linaro pieces in there haven't been touched in two years and
are there
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:02:08AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> > /tool/yocto/poky-extras/meta-linaro \
>
> I think you should remove above layer from BBLAYERS
I agree - that one is unofficial and unmaintained. Linaro is
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> /tool/yocto/poky-extras/meta-linaro \
I think you should remove above layer from BBLAYERS
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Hi,
In my bblayers.conf, I've included the poky-extras/meta-linaro meta
layer.
BBLAYERS ?= " \
/tool/yocto/poky/meta \
/tool/yocto/poky/meta-yocto \
/tool/yocto/poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev \
/tool/yocto/poky-extras/meta-linaro \
/tool/yocto/meta-openembedded/meta-oe
21 matches
Mail list logo
