Re: [yocto] meta-oracle-java layer maintainer

On 14-07-29 01:39 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-07-29 01:36 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi there, At the moment there are a few patches / queries outstanding for the the meta- oracle-java layer on this mailing list. Unfortunately the current maintainer doesn't have time to maintain the

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

x-yocto version, and the branch will get stable updates, bug fixes, BSP support, etc. Bruce - Armin On 07/22/2014 08:58 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-07-22 11:54 AM, akuster wrote: Alexandru, Regarding a few packages in category C&D. I have latest samhain building as well as grsecur

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

Bruce Alex -Original Message----- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 7:26 AM To: akuster; Alexandru Vaduva; Joe MacDonald Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal On 2014-07-31, 9:30 PM, akuster wro

Re: [yocto] mpc8315e-rdb is probably a poor choice as powerpc example...

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: > As most of you know, the mpc8315e-rdb is the powerpc reference platform in > meta-yocto-bsp. This is old technology and not a good representative of > QorIQ. We've been working with FSL to find a suitable replacement for some time, and the di

Re: [yocto] Kernel driver for Turbosight TBS6285 DVB card

On 2014-08-19, 5:26 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: I need to include the kernel driver for the Turbosight TBS6285 DVB card in an image. The official bundle at http://www.tbsdtv.com/download/document/common/tbs-linux-drivers_v140707.zip includes the drivers and a load of other "stuff" (e.g. a full V4L

Re: [yocto] Kernel driver for Turbosight TBS6285 DVB card

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > On 20 Aug 2014, at 03:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On 2014-08-19, 5:26 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: >>> I need to include the kernel driver for the Turbosight TBS6285 DVB c

Re: [yocto] Kernel driver for Turbosight TBS6285 DVB card

On 14-08-21 04:17 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 21 Aug 2014, at 05:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: Hi Bruce, Thanks for the feedback. On 20 Aug 2014, at 03:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2014-08-19, 5:26 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: I need to include the

Re: [yocto] Kernel driver for Turbosight TBS6285 DVB card

On 14-08-21 03:11 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 21 Aug 2014, at 19:28, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-08-21 04:17 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 21 Aug 2014, at 05:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: Hi Bruce, Thanks for the feedback. On 20 Aug 2014, at 03

Re: [yocto] kernel patches

On 14-08-22 08:17 AM, Sona Sarmadi wrote: Hi all, I wonder how you handle the kernel patches? I want to apply a security kernel patch to Linux-yocto 3.10 which is used by Romely: meta-inte/meta-romley/conf/machine/romley-ivb.conf:PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= "3.10%" For me the obvious

Re: [yocto] Kernel driver for Turbosight TBS6285 DVB card

On 14-08-22 03:37 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 21 Aug 2014, at 20:30, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-08-21 03:11 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 21 Aug 2014, at 19:28, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-08-21 04:17 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: On 21 Aug 2014, at 05:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Aug 20

Re: [yocto] kernel patches

On 14-08-22 12:02 PM, Sona Sarmadi wrote: Bruce, Thanks for quick response. See inline my comments. Have a nice weekend /Sona Please let me know if this is the correct way. And also let me know if I upstream this kernel patch to yocto, will yocto accept it (if the patch looks correct > of co

Re: [yocto] New kernel error after syncing

On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:02 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > Hello, > > Is anyone else seeing kernel build issue on 3.14 with the resent updates? > > > I am getting the following errors on ppc64 (standard/qemuppc). x86-64 built > fine (core-image-minimal). building ppc now. Hopefully qemuppc is buildin

Re: [yocto] New kernel error after syncing

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On 14-08-25 15:56:57, akuster808 wrote: >> Khem >> >> it was the config option not being set.. >> >> seems like a kernel bug to me.. kconfig or otherwise. > > OK, I was thinking may be it would help if we should somehow review the > linux-yocto ke

Re: [linux-yocto] Review request 0/5: GRE Refresh [ US43662 ]

Gatekeeper: Bruce Ashfield Lockdown Approval (if needed): Branch Tag: master for WRL 7 IP Statement (form link or license statement, usually automated): Crypto URL(s) (if needed): see http://wiki.wrs.com/PBUeng/LinuxProductDivisionExportProcess Parent Template (where applicable

Re: [yocto] Kernel features

On 2014-09-07, 4:51 AM, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote: Today I have spent quite a while trying to figure how KERNEL_FEATURES works and why some of the things I pass in my configuration fragment are not getting enabled. It turned out that some of the options no longer existed and some had been renamed.

Re: [yocto] Kernel features

On 2014-09-08, 1:50 AM, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote: Hi Bruce, On 7 September 2014 15:17, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2014-09-07, 4:51 AM, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote: Today I have spent quite a while trying to figure how KERNEL_FEATURES works and why some of the things I pass in my configuration

Re: [yocto] Fwd: Kernel features

On 14-09-08 02:07 PM, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote: On 8 September 2014 13:14, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Ah, but we do verify it. There's a check config task, that used to be more visible, I got complaints and we hid it. I have a 1.7 task to make it more visible again :) I hav

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] Add MIPS Creator CI20 machine

On 14-09-12 12:35 PM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: Add support for the MIPS Creator CI20 machine. You will need to build a working kernel for this board using this kernel repository on GitHub: https://github.com/MIPS/CI20_linux More information about this board can be found at: http://el

Re: [yocto] is anything happening with "meta-kernel-dev" layer?

On 2014-10-11, 7:03 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: just noticed the entry at: http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers for "meta-kernel-dev": http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-kernel-dev/ which doesn't seem to be doing a whole lot these

Re: [yocto] Test in do_patch() fails for annotated tags

Jeff and I have already exchanged email on this yesterday. While using a tag for the SRCREV is not typically something we suggest .. tweaking the ancestor check is fine in this case, since it works in both scenarios. I have a patch queued to address this, and am soaking it now. Bruce On Thu, Nov

Re: [yocto] How to adjust patching striplevel while using SCC

On 2014-11-19, 6:54 PM, Lin Shen (lshen) wrote: I’m using SCC file to list all my kernel patches, and like to adjust the patching striplevel much the way how the “striplevel” option works for SRC_URI. It's not possible. scc uses git and git porcelean patches to apply changes to the kernel .. wh

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes

On 14-12-02 02:37 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote: [Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes] On 14.12.02 (Tue 14:03) Alexandru Vaduva wrote: Hello Bian, Did you know that the multipath tools recipe was also available inside the meta-oe and meta-virtualization? I do not have any problems with it bein

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes

On 14-12-02 03:17 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote: [Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes] On 14.12.02 (Tue 14:49) Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-12-02 02:37 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote: [Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes] On 14.12.02 (Tue 14:03) Alexandru Vaduva wrote: Hello Bian, Did you

Re: [yocto] [meta-realtime][PATCH] meta-realtime: Add LAYERVERSION and LAYERDEPENDS

On 2014-12-02, 9:18 PM, jackie.hu...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jackie Huang I happened to notice this and have grabbed the change. But make sure your workflow adds maintainers to the cc on patches, otherwise you can't blame anyone if they are missed/dropped. Bruce According to README, it

Re: [yocto] [meta-yocto-bsp][PATCH] beaglebone.conf: update KERNEL_IMAGETYPE to match u-boot

On 12/09/2014 10:44 AM, Maciej Borzecki wrote: U-boot 2014.07 in Poky expects a zImage kernel image, thus a build done with current machien config will not be directly useable. Update machine config to produce a zImage. poky's README.hardware should be updated as well. When we wrote the instru

Re: [yocto] [meta-yocto-bsp][PATCH] beaglebone.conf: update KERNEL_IMAGETYPE to match u-boot

On 12/09/2014 12:59 PM, Maciek Borzecki wrote: On wto, 2014-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12/09/2014 10:44 AM, Maciej Borzecki wrote: U-boot 2014.07 in Poky expects a zImage kernel image, thus a build done with current machien config will not be directly useable. Update

Re: [yocto] [meta-yocto-bsp][PATCH] beaglebone.conf: update KERNEL_IMAGETYPE to match u-boot

On 12/11/2014 07:05 AM, Maciek Borzecki wrote: On wto, 2014-12-09 at 10:50 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 04:44:31PM +0100, Maciej Borzecki wrote: U-boot 2014.07 in Poky expects a zImage kernel image, thus a build done with current machien config will not be directly us

Re: [yocto] bump linux-yocto-dev to 3.18?

On 14-12-17 01:02 PM, Cody P Schafer wrote: It looks like http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-dev/ is still sitting at 3.17.6, are their plans to merge the 3.18 changes? Or does linux-yocto-dev wait on stable kernel releases? Or is this blocked on something else I'm unaware of?

Re: [yocto] Kernel configuration

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: > I thought I knew how to do this, but... ;-) > > I'm trying to add configuration items to the valleyisland BSP. I've got the > following bbappend: > > File: linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend > --- > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:" > >

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Bug reporting and good bug reports

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:01 AM, Paul Eggleton >> wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 07 January 2015 16:36:37 Khem Raj wrote: On Jan 7, 2015, at 1:25 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: I was informed on irc yesterday that bug reports are hard a

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Bug reporting and good bug reports

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Jan 8, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> Assigning and scoping the actual work doesn't scale based on email threads >> (as someone who has been thrashing to keep information straight, and >&

Re: [yocto] linux: having problems forcing a kernel recompile...

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working with the latest poky master branch (as of this morning: > 876370419a), and I can't force a recompile of the kernel: > > $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f > > fails with > > | make[2]: *** [prepare3] Error 1 > > I have s

Re: [yocto] linux: having problems forcing a kernel recompile...

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: > On 01/10/2015 02:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bob Cochran >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm working with the latest poky master branch (as o

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] fix '[[: not found' error message using dash

Not bad for a first patch submission! Just two little things to change. #1, this should go to the oe-core mailing list (openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org), and not the yocto one. It definitely is not always obvious at the beginning which list to use for what! On 15-01-12 08:42 AM, Vince

Re: [yocto] can't find the source code of kernel

On 2015-01-15 5:03 AM, neil...@emerson.com wrote: Hi ,all The version of poky is 1.7. I build the linux-yocto is successful . bitbake linux-yocto But, why I can’t find the source code of linux in ${WORKDIR}. It should be there (note: it is about to move in master, but not in 1.7.1). In WO

Re: [yocto] can't find the source code of kernel

from a git repository, not a tarball. In that directory where you see the qemuarm build you should also see a git.indirectionsymlink that points to the git tree in downloads/git2/ Cheers, Bruce Do you have any other better suggestion? Thank you very much. Neil -Original Message- Fro

Re: [yocto] Kernel build woes

On 15-01-21 11:02 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: Since the recent changes in how the kernel is built, some useful workflows have been broken. In particular when working on a kernel, I use this sequence quite a lot: $ bitbake virtual/kernel $ bitbake virtual/kernel -c devshell ... make some twea

Re: [yocto] (IIO) ADC freeze on am335x processor on 3.14.26ltsi kernel

On 15-01-26 11:54 PM, Yani Dubin wrote: Hi, I have run up against a kernel bug on the dizzy branch where a read of an ADC channel (IIO bus) on a Sitara (am335x) processor locks up the process reading the /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio\:device0/in_voltage?_raw node. The system remains stable, but th

Re: [yocto] (IIO) ADC freeze on am335x processor on 3.14.26ltsi kernel

On 2015-01-27 9:13 PM, Yani Dubin wrote: On 28 January 2015 at 12:19, Yani Dubin mailto:yani.du...@taitradio.com>> wrote: Since this is my first time reporting a kernel bug, and I now know exactly what I am looking for can you give me any pointers on where/how to search to see if an

Re: [yocto] Yocto-custom kernel build issue

On 15-01-30 09:08 AM, Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: Hi, I am new to yocto project build system. I downloaded the yocto project build system from git. I built for the all qemu architectures(MIPS,ARM,PPC,X86) and ran on qemu. all are working fine. Now I need to create a bsp layer for my board whi

Re: [yocto] yocto-custom-kernel issue

On 15-02-03 07:40 AM, Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: Hi, I want to add BSP layer for my mechine and I should take the our own customized kernel source(our kernel source). For that I add the BSP layer and wrote the recipe for that. My recipe is as follows: ***

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux] Kernel bbappend missing for 3.17 ?

On 2015-02-06 7:37 AM, Timo Pulkkinen wrote: Hello, it seems that there is no bbappend -file for kernel 3.17 which causes selinux not to be enabled in the kernel. The repository contains only recipe/bbappend file for kernel 3.14 (linux-yocto_3.14.bbappend). Is this correct? If we wait a few

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

On 15-02-10 08:06 AM, Stephen Flowers wrote: Hi All, I have built the realtime kernel using Yocto and deployed on the beaglebone black (specifically core-image-rt-sdk). I have written a program to test the timer latency and interrupt latency of userspace applications. For this I'm using a simp

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

the test. Bruce Interrupt response (microseconds) standard: min: 81, max:118, average: 84 rt: min: 224, max: 289, average: 231 Will share the .config later once I get on that machine. Steve On 10/02/2015 14:16, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 15-02-10 08:06 AM, Stephen Flowers wrote: Hi All, I

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

ted for RT. That is the trade-off. I still think the number you are getting for RT seem high but I don't know what your test is doing in detail. (I did read your explanation.) cyclictest should give us a standard baseline. Agreed. Bruce On 02/11/2015 10:25 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

for RT seem high but I don't know what your test is doing in detail. (I did read your explanation.) cyclictest should give us a standard baseline. On 02/11/2015 10:25 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 15-02-11 03:50 AM, Stephen Flowers wrote: my bad, here is the patch set. As for load, only system

Re: [yocto] meta-oracle-java error when building a recipe

On 15-02-17 11:17 AM, Alexandru Vaduva wrote: When trying to build 'oracle-jse-jdk' from meta-oracle-java layer I found this errors. ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'oracle-jse-jdk' ERROR: oracle-jse-jdk was skipped: True bitbake-layers show-recipes | grep "oracle-" Parsing recipes..don

Re: [yocto] meta-oracle-java error when building a recipe

itecture '%s' is not supported by the meta-oracle-java layer" %TA) return javaPkg Unless someone extends arch support to ARMv7, that skip is going to persist. Cheers, Bruce On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 7:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 15-02-17 11:17 AM, Alex

Re: [yocto] kernel config and meta-altera

On 15-02-17 07:55 AM, PIEWALD Georg wrote: Hi all, I'm rather new to the Yocto world so please bear with me. I built a Linux kernel using the Altera "Golden System Reference Design" [1], which is a 1GB tarball containing all required layers and all source code. Works fine. Now I'd like to cust

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

0.587306337206.8056595 Standard Min-608.667123.75 Max612448.083 Avg0.5557039153.5281784 All help appreciated, Steve On 13/02/2015 05:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-02-12 7:20 PM, William Mills wrote: On 02/12/2015 05:05

Re: [yocto] Yocto Realtime tests on beaglebone black

? Are there any high priority tasks that might be starving the handling of your interrupts ? Bruce Steve On 18/02/2015 14:57, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 15-02-17 05:57 PM, Stephen Flowers wrote: I loaded the system effectively and also changed my rt application to use asynchronous IO - I find t

Re: [yocto] WARNING: QA Issue

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Kai Ulrich wrote: > Hi, > > > During a "bitbake core-image-sato-sdk" > WARNING: QA Issue: smstools3 requires /bin/bash, but no providers in its > RDEPENDS [file-rdeps] > > You can find the sources > https://github.com/kaiulrich/meta-smstools3 > > Any thing I can

Re: [yocto] cannot compile kernel module - headers missing

On 2015-02-23 10:02 AM, Jens Rapp wrote: hi, i have a simple hello world kernel module and i cannot compile it. linux headers are missing i tried to set -I $(OECORE_TARGET_SYSROOT)usr/src/kernel/include/ but there seems to be much more missing.. What release are you using ? The kernel sources

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc" while ref manual variable glossary uses KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter" is there a

Re: [yocto] what is the "simplest unit of kernel Metadata"?

On 15-03-03 08:32 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual, section 3.4.1, claims: "The simplest unit of kernel Metadata is the configuration-only feature. This feature consists of one or more Linux kernel configuration parameters in a configuration fragment file (.cfg) and a .scc file

Re: [yocto] preferred KERNEL_FEATURES format: netfilter or netfilter.scc?

On 15-03-03 11:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote: kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of: KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilte

Re: [yocto] possible "include" flags within .scc files?

On 2015-03-04 4:46 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: ok, i might need to switch to decaf shortly ... wandering through linux-yocto-3.19 git repo, the meta branch, collecting examples of things to use in class, and ran across this: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-3.19/tree

Re: [yocto] valid git directives allowed in .scc files?

On 2015-03-04 4:23 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: still perusing kernel dev manual, and section 3.5 talks about git-related directives such as branch newbranch git merge myfeature but over in the linux-yocto_3.19 git repo in the meta branch, there's an example, features/pvr/pvr.scc, whos

Re: [yocto] should YP docs explain "type=kmeta" and "destsuffix="?

On 15-03-04 10:10 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i see that the meta-xilinx layer takes advantage of extending the search path for features directories with things like: SRC_URI = " \ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;protocol=https;branch=${KBRANCH} \

Re: [yocto] in kernel manual, should pick another example for KMACHINE

On 15-03-05 11:56 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: I like Nathan's suggestion for the text. Can someone explain to me though why emenlow is not a good example here? In the linux-yocto_3.14.bbappend file, KMACHINE_emenlow-noemgd is set equal to "emenlow". Isn't this equating emenlow-noemgd and e

Re: [yocto] "unused"/uninstalled tools in yocto-kernel-tools?

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > continuing my voyage of discovery through the various yocto kernel > tools, and i see the Makefile which lists the kern_tools: > > kern_tools_LIST = kgit kgit-init kgit-meta \ > kgit-checkpoint kgit-clean \ >

Re: [yocto] Question: Yocto 1.7.1 kernel config defconfig will not be used?

On 15-03-09 04:36 AM, Chung-Yeh Wang wrote: Hi List, I am using Yocto 1.7.1 to build linux-mainline. I found defconfig will not be used when using linux-yocto-custom.bb (maybe also happens on linux-yocto). I think below is the reason, 1. kernel_do_configure is r

Re: [yocto] Question: Yocto 1.7.1 kernel config defconfig will not be used?

the input defconfig. Cheers, Bruce > > Chungyeh > > 2015-03-09 21:02 GMT+08:00 Bruce Ashfield : >> >> On 15-03-09 04:36 AM, Chung-Yeh Wang wrote: >>> >>> Hi List, >>> >>> I am using Yocto 1.7.1 to build linux-mainline. I found defconf

Re: [yocto] do_kernel_configme error when patches create directories

On 15-03-10 09:49 AM, Jeff Melville wrote: I'm using a Yocto flow to build for the Zynq with the meta-xilinx with some customizations: - I'm using a bbappend to replace the linux-xlnx 3.14 kernel with one that has had mainline changes from 3.14.17 merged in. - I added a task between patch and con

Re: [yocto] Set Default Kernel Version Q

On 2015-03-11 4:47 AM, Albert K wrote: Hi, I have set the PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto = "3.17%" in the ~/porky/build/conf/local.conf but it does not seem to be working. Where can I set so that the default kernel version is used (currently is compiling with kernel 3.14 with dizzy). Thanks.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] linux-yocto-rt: removed duplicated line

On 2015-03-11 5:52 AM, Alexandru.Vaduva wrote: Seemed that the recipe contained redundant information. Indeed! Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield Signed-off-by: Alexandru.Vaduva --- meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bb | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Get rid of do_shared_workdir task

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ed Bartosh wrote: > Merged do_shared_workdir into kernel_do_compile > > This change should fix race condition between do_compilemodules > and do_shared_workdir. Race occurs when do_compilemodules changes > include/generated/ directory content while do_shared_workdi

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Get rid of do_shared_workdir task

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ed Bartosh > wrote: >> Merged do_shared_workdir into kernel_do_compile >> >> This change should fix race condition between do_compilemodules >> and do_shared_workdir. Race

Re: [yocto] is meta-yocto-kernel-extras still being used?

On 2015-03-12 6:58 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: current dev manual refers to this layer in section 2.2, but it doesn't look like much has happened with that repo in quite some time. I'm the main user, and am simply lazy and pushing updates. That being said, its use for others has been repla

Re: [yocto] Kernel configuration fragments and defconfig from kernel source tree, not meta layer file

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alex J Lennon wrote: > Hi, > > I've been looking into a request to have Yocto kernel configuration > fragment support in meta-raspberrypi with a defconfig which is pulled > from the kernel source tree for the configured machine. > > My understanding is that Yocto e

Re: [yocto] yocto master work-shared, kernel .config seems to have gone awol

On 2015-03-30 01:36 PM, Alex J Lennon wrote: Hi, I'm updating to Yocto master and have been seeing that when I bitbake -c devshell virtual/kernel I go into a work-shared tree now. There was a discussion on the list about this. See the patch from Ross: [OE-core] [PATCH] devshell: allow the sta

Re: [yocto] "fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists."

On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: oh, what fresh hell is this? ... snip ... NOTE: Preparing RunQueue NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks ERROR: Function failed: do_validate_branches (log file is located at /home/rpjday/oe/builds/qemux86/tmp/work/qemux86

Re: [yocto] "fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists."

On 2015-04-01 3:07 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: oh, what fresh hell is this? ... snip ... NOTE: Preparing RunQueue NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks ERROR: Function

Re: [yocto] "fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists."

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On 2015-04-01 3:07 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> > >> > > On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day w

Re: [yocto] [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the kernel's final configuration

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Liam Maps wrote: > Hi, > > During the build of a core-image-base for BeagleBone using the master branch > I was presented with the following warning: > > "WARNING: [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the > kernel's final configuration:" > > The fu

Re: [yocto] [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the kernel's final configuration

nt to a value that is valid for the kernel in question. So no matter what we set it to, the kernel configuration system (i.e. korg, not yocto) has the final say. That's more than often what you are seeing when those values change. Bruce > > Thank you. > > > > On

Re: [yocto] The error of task do_validate_branches

On 2015-04-13 11:14 PM, neil...@emerson.com wrote: Hi, all I build the custom linux-yocto kernel, it appears the error as bellow : Hi Neil, Can you provide a bit more information ? What release/branch are you building ? Obviously you are building a variant of linux-yocto that wasn't released

Re: [yocto] SRCREV Issue for custom linux kernel

On 2015-04-14 6:48 AM, Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: Hi All, I got the an error while i am checking out the linux kernel from the SVN to build in the YOCTO project environment. What release is this ? master ? An older release ? And are you seeing this same error if you have a kernel recipe tha

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote: Hi Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion like this. As ARM now also moved to device tree it look like in future we will have more kernels that are using device tree then ones that are not. True, but it has been like t

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > > On 04/15/2015 04:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >> >> Adding oe-core, since that's the r

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > > On 04/15/2015 06:26 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bruce, >>> >>> >>> On

Re: [yocto] [poky] Initramfs not appended to kernel image

On 2015-04-16 6:23 AM, Wouter van Rooy wrote: Hello, For the last week or so I have been struggling to build a kernel image with an embedded initramfs using the mechanisms provided by Poky Daisy. In local.conf I have set INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE to "1" and INITRAMFS_IMAGE to the name of my image

Re: [yocto] SRCREV Issue for custom linux kernel

patches.scc \ " LINUX_VERSION ?= "3.10.14" LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION ?= "-custom" SRCREV = "94" PR = "r0" PV = "${LINUX_VERSION}" S = "${WORKDIR}/linux-3.10.14" COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_arqlyn = "arqlyn" Regards, Raghav

Re: [yocto] SRCREV issue with linux-yocto-custom do_validate_branches()

On 2015-04-17 6:12 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: Hi All, I'm having a little trouble with do_validate_branches() inherited by my linux-yocto-custom. I'm building the 3.14.28 kernel with ltsi kernel patch set applied, so was trying to set this up with a custom linux recipe in my bsp. Out of curio

Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd

On 04/20/2015 04:43 AM, Anders Darander wrote: * Matt Schuckmann [150417 23:27]: I've got an image for a AM3352 system based on Dylan and Arago and I'm trying to switch to systemd for init. So far I haven't had much luck. First off I'm getting different results depending on where I turn it o

Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd

On 04/20/2015 02:06 PM, Matt Schuckmann wrote: -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:52 AM To: Matt Schuckmann; Yocto Project Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd On 04/20/2015 04:43 AM, Anders Darander

Re: [yocto] SRCREV issue with linux-yocto-custom do_validate_branches()

On 04/21/2015 08:21 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: On 17 April 2015 14:28, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-04-17 6:12 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: Hi All, I'm having a little trouble with do_validate_branches() inherited by my linux-yocto-custom. I'm building the 3.14.28 kernel with ltsi ke

Re: [yocto] [poky] Initramfs not appended to kernel image

On 2015-04-20 05:09 AM, Wouter van Rooy wrote: Hi Bruce, First of all, thanks for your answer. It would be a comforting idea to get this initramfs implemented cleanly in my project. On 16-04-15 16:22, Bruce Ashfield wrote: I'm the proud owner of the bugzilla to document this process b

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-04-28 02:49 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: Hi everyone, I have a working root fs based on “dizzy”, for which I created a customized machine config, a custom package config recipe and a custom image recipe. When running into problems with the python installation on that rootfs I decided to

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-04-28 11:36 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: Hmmm. It shouldn't have gone missing. Bits of the kernel build outputs did move around in 1.8, but the abiversion is still generated and placed in the STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR. I was just wondering, is there an easy way to resolve these Paths from

Re: [yocto] Yocto linux-kernel

On 04/29/2015 08:38 AM, Parthiban Kandasamy wrote: i am using beagleboard-xm like board for my custom use. for my development i am using yocto-dora-1.5 as bsp and kernel-2.6.32(i downgraded). while bitbaking kernel, i got error as follows: Log data follows: | DEBUG: Executing shell fun

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 04/29/2015 03:38 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: Have you tried setting linux-dummy as the preferred provider for the kernel ? That would skip the build processing doing anything more than satisfying the various kernel dependencies. Ah, that's a good hint, I'll try that. After your build ha

Re: [yocto] Kernel customized do_fetch issue

On 2015-04-29 01:39 PM, Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou wrote: Hi all, I created a do_fetch() for checkout in-house git repo, which is working fine with OE. do_fetch() { cd ${WORKDIR} rm -rf ${PN}-${PV} git clone ssh://svcsw...@git-ccxsw.inhouse.com/linux-lsk ${PN}-${PV} cd ${PN}-${

Re: [yocto] Kernel customized do_fetch issue

On 2015-04-29 02:08 PM, Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou wrote: But the question has to be asked. Why exactly are you manually fetching the kernel ? The fetcher can take care of most everything. The whole story is starting at the url of our git repo. We have a git URL like: ssh://svcsw...@git-ccxsw.

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-04-30 3:14 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: That is really odd. I'll be interested to hear how that happened. I just did a test and it points to where I expect: [/home/bruc...poky/build]> bitbake -e core-image-minimal | grep STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR # $STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR STAGING_KERNE

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-04-30 08:27 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: What kernel recipe is used when your machine is set to 'astro' ? Something custom ? Or have you added machine compatibility to another known kernel recipe ? How would I see which kernel recipe is used? This is where my brute force techniques pr

Re: [yocto] fido: out-of-tree module build fails due to wrong Module.symvers reference

On 2015-05-03 12:16 PM, Timo Korthals wrote: Dear yocto developers, the following "more generic" workaround worked also, which let's me assume that the "Module.symvers" in ${S} is somehow broken? Content of "linux-yocto_3.19.bbappend": do_install_append() { cp -f ${KBUILD_OUTPUT}/Module.sy

Re: [yocto] Need advice on tracking down "-dirty"

On 2015-05-08 5:36 AM, Spriggs, Jim wrote: Hi Guys, Using poky dizzy with meta-altera (from OE), and trying to implement a simple loadable kernel-module by following the method outlined in Lab3 of https://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/default/files/kernel-lab-1.6.pdf. I'm doing an "rm -rf tmp"

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide what you need (but since it doesn't build anything, there is no abi .. and no modules can be built against it) .. s

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

On 2015-05-12 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide what you need

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >