On 12-02-16 06:18 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On 02/16/2012 03:02 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
That's the problem. I have a patch that detects this and abort is a non
bare upstream is used. I just need to send them .. which I'll do when
I get back to my desk next week.
There are two reason
On 12-02-16 06:52 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On 02/16/2012 03:25 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
The point is that the tree is local to your machine, but it doesn't
have to be. You may only have push, not direct commit access. It's
really not asking for anything that isn't already common practice
On 12-02-17 11:45 AM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On 02/16/2012 03:02 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
That's the problem. I have a patch that detects this and abort is a non
bare upstream is used. I just need to send them .. which I'll do when
I get back to my desk next week.
There are two reason
On 12-02-24 03:29 AM, Joshua Immanuel wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:10 +0530, Joshua Immanuel wrote:
While trying to generate my custom rootfs image, I added the
linux_yocto_3.0.bbappend file to my custom layer and specified the
KMACHINE, SRCREV and COMPATIBLE_MACHINE variables. I
On 12-02-24 7:35 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi,
This is a new feature added to enable PVR for the Cedartrail BSP in the kernel.
Please pull into meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg for both linux-yocto-3.0 and
linux-yocto-3.2 .
Looks good.
On 12-02-27 12:04 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bring linux-yocto-tiny inline with the other 3.0 linux-yocto-* recipes.
Built and booted for qemux86.
I'm just about to pull the trigger (i.e. a matter of hours) on 3.0.22. If
you want to wait for that, or let this stand, either is fine with me, but
I
On 12-02-24 7:35 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Cedartrail has pvr kernel features and patches.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
---
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/drm-cdvpvr.cfg |9 +
On 12-02-29 07:13 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi,
This patch is to enable Cedarview config parameters and add the kernel patches
to the yocto/pvr branch in linux-yocto-3.0 and linux-yocto-3.2 tree.
The patch itself looks ok. When merging
On 12-03-01 06:58 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Backport 7 patches bringing pch_uart up to date with required fixes and new
features to support the 4 new patches (from me) enabling the FRI2 serial port.
My patches have been sent to LKML and have received the approval one of the
driver maintainers.
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Rather than add these as features in the linux-yocto recipe,
include them in the BSP meta-data directly. Include only the core
EFI bits in the fri2.scc, and add the extended EFI support to the
fri2-standard.scc so that other ktypes don't pull in more than
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
Several BSPs duplicated the boot-live fragment in their BSP
specific config. Remove the duplication and add CONFIG_RD_GZIP
and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR to the boot-live fragment.
Looks fine to me as well. That's a
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
The FRI2 uses the pch_uart driver for the serial console. Enable the console
driver.
It this safe for all eg20t users ? I see the crownbay also
uses this.
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Darren
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
Rather than add these as features in the linux-yocto recipe,
include them in the BSP meta-data directly. Include only the core
EFI bits in the fri2.scc, and add the extended EFI support to the
fri2-standard.scc so
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
Move policy features out of fri2.scc and into the fri2-KTYPE.scc files. This
allows KTYPEs like tiny to build smaller kernels while still reusing the
fri2.scc file.
Exactly. Good factoring of the options.
I had
%3Aossrev=10
I'll update the header during the merge to have this reference.
We have tested it on 3.0, but not yet tried on 3.2.
In this case, I'll merge to 3.0, and we can do a forward propagation
when we know 3.2 works.
Bruce
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce
On 12-03-02 4:40 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/02/2012 01:16 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
The FRI2 uses the pch_uart driver for the serial console. Enable the console
driver.
It this safe for all eg20t users ? I
a1ed2ace8b2f1fdab2c17a570f612b58f17fca7b:
linux-yocto: v3.2.9, v3.0.23 + fixes and updates (2012-03-04 22:44:23 -0500)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib zedd/kernel-yocto
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel-yocto
Bruce Ashfield (1):
linux
-rt38
- linux-yocto/rt: update to 3.2.9-rt15
These have been built for all qemu targets, and built for the appropriate
hardware platforms.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
---
.../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend |2 +-
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux
On 12-03-06 06:41 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
Hi Dexuan,
After more investigation, I found that the:
-I/path/to/sysroot/usr/include
has been treated as the standard system include directory,
and from gcc's manual:
-I dir
Add the directory dir to the list of directories to be searched for
header
On 12-03-06 10:24 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 03/06/2012 07:21 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
On 03/06/2012 11:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:04 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers
a kernel header file include/linux/types.h, but it
On 12-03-06 12:28 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
Nominally it is to protect them from kernel headers changes and to not
require headers or a full tree to be present (or at least this is what
I've learned over the years, I
On 12-03-09 09:36 AM, Bob Cochran wrote:
On 03/09/2012 08:43 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-03-09 07:20 AM, David Nyström wrote:
Hi All,
Whats yoctos take on LTSI ?
http://git.linuxfoundation.org/?p=ltsi-kernel.git;a=summary
http://lwn.net/Articles/484337/
I've noticed that LTT-ng
On 12-03-09 02:03 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi,
These addtional patches enable Cedarview hdmi and acpi.
Please pull thme to the yocto/pvr branch in linux-yocto-3.0 tree.
Looks fine. will Merge it shortly and send a confirmation.
Bruce
On 12-03-12 11:09 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
Hi Bruce,
Please pull in the emgd-1.10 topic branch below into linux-yocto-3.2.
Thanks,
Tom
The following changes since commit 417fc778a86e81303bab5883b919ee422ec51c04:
Bruce Ashfield (1
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:30 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Hi Tom,
Some thoughts on this with respect to cleaning up and simplifying the
recipes per our earlier discussions.
On 03/12/2012 09:37 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com
On 12-03-13 11:03 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:30 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Hi Tom,
Some thoughts on this with respect to cleaning up
On 12-03-13 2:12 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi,
This patch is to create a new scc file for merging the yocto/pvr branch for the
targets
with the appropriate hardware support.
Just so I'm clear, there are no current users of this in the
On 12-03-14 10:45 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/13/2012 09:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-03-14 12:05 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/13/2012 08:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-03-13 11:03 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13
On 12-03-14 4:40 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/14/2012 01:25 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-03-14 10:45 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/13/2012 09:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-03-14 12:05 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/13/2012 08:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-03-13 11:03 PM, Tom
On 12-03-13 11:57 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
Hi Bruce,
Please pull this patchset into linux-yocto-3.2,
standard/default/emenlow.
merged. I'm building this along with my other updates, will push
when they complete.
Bruce
Thanks,
Tom
The
On 12-03-14 02:56 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following changes since commit 64840f55ee144e9814278eaa8e3f33dd60da892c:
meta/emgd: emgd 1.10 updates (2012-03-12 11:48:22 -0400)
Queued with my other 3.2 changes. Should be pushed out tomorrow.
Bruce
are available in the git repository at:
On 12-03-14 02:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hartdvh...@linux.intel.com
The following changes since commit e559129b4a6f39f68b75141096b2d516cf7a7f35:
fri2: Add SMP and EFI support (2012-03-02 16:02:35 -0500)
Queued with my consolidated updates.
Bruce
are available in the git
On 12-03-20 8:59 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 03/14/2012 01:27 AM, Lianhao Lu wrote:
Set the PREFERRED_VERSION of lttng-ust to use lttng-ust instead of
lttng2-ust in poky distro. This fixed yocto bug #2062.
The lttng2 is very different in terms of architecture and usage model,
compared
to lttng.
On 12-03-23 05:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
In support of the self-hosted-image, add CONFIG_PCNET32 to the common-pc BSP
default cfg. This enables the qemux86 image to be run on both qemux86 machines
as well as the vmware 32b machine. Since the qemux86 machine optionally supports
pcnet, this seems
On 12-03-26 05:19 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
[YOCTO #1487]
For the liveCD image, interactive bootup is needed, but psplash prevents from
booting interactively. In such case ISO image is not usable, so remove ISO image
and the corresponding link and throw error info to warn outside to enable
unionfs in
On 12-03-30 01:18 PM, Andrea Galbusera wrote:
While beta testing yocto 1.2 I'm building for beagleboard with:
OE Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= 1.15.1
TARGET_ARCH = arm
TARGET_OS = linux-gnueabi
MACHINE = beagleboard
DISTRO= poky
DISTRO_VERSION=
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Bob Cochran yo...@mindchasers.com wrote:
On 03/30/2012 01:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
There are a few outstanding items for 1.2 as part of M4 .. one of
them is squashing the remaining configuration values that are
causing warnings.
I'm also seeing some
On 12-03-31 10:44 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
Prepare for the linux-yocto-tiny_3.2 recipe by consolidating the tiny config
and factoring out what should be common functinionality.
Once included, I'll send the linux-yocto-tiny_3.2 patch against oe-core with
the proper SRCREV_meta. The other
On 12-04-04 05:29 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
just noticed that BSP guide suggests 3.0 is the preferred linux
kernel, while the source itself is now up to 3.2. should those match?
this is for *development* streams of both.
Not necessarily. It depends on the target. We haven't moved
On 12-04-04 04:46 AM, Om Prakash PAL wrote:
Hi,
I want to build my local kernel/Driver code, not the default one.
please help how can i do it ?.
any wiki/docs on this?.
The BSP developer guides show how to extend the yocto kernels, and
also have sections on custom/different kernel versions.
On 12-04-04 08:04 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote:
Hi Tomas,
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Tomas Frydrych
tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get Yocto image built from yesterday's master
(Linux-3.0.23-yocto-standard) to boot on the NAND-less version of
BeagleBoard xM, but
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Tomas Frydrych
tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to add a kernel config fragment to the yocto 2.6.37 kernel
for BeagleBoard, because I need a driver for a rt2800usb dongle.
For some reason which I cannot work out, the rt2800usb options are
From: Bruce Ashfield [bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 6:17 PM
To: Om Prakash PAL
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto.
On 12-04-04 04:46 AM, Om Prakash PAL wrote:
Hi,
I want to build my local
,
Om Prakash Pal
From: Bruce Ashfield [bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 9:32 AM
To: Om Prakash PAL
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto.
On 12-04-08 10:04 AM, Om Prakash
On 12-04-10 04:40 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
I think this is a summary of the steps needed to reconfigure the kernel,based
on the instructions in the 6.0.1 dev manual:
1) bitbake linux-yocto -c clean
2) bitbake linux-yocto -c menuconfig
3) bitbake linux-yocto -c compile -f
4) bitbake linux-yocto
On 12-04-10 08:15 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Romley machine has builtin 82580 Giga bit Ethernet
Controller. Adding the relavent igb nic driver.
Looks fine for the tree, no risk to other BSPs. Correct me
if you'd rather this wait until
On 12-04-11 11:24 AM, Om Prakash PAL wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:04 PM
To: Om Prakash PAL
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto.
On Mon, Apr 9
On 12-04-11 01:08 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 6:25 AM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Bruce Ashfield
Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [KERNEL] Add igb driver
On 12-04-16 8:18 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
From: Denys Dmytriyenkode...@ti.com
The boot hangs with the message:
mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising SD card
The MMC driver has issues initializing when PREEMPT is enabled (either forced
or voluntary). Unplugging and then plugging the card
On 12-04-25 06:06 AM, Kang Kai wrote:
Commit 1c3ae5441 fixes MIPS CPU cache alias problem. But it makes
Put a short log after the commit ID, that way we can read what the
old commit was trying to do right in this commit.
posix test cases mlockall/3-6 3-7 fail.
Can we expand on what the
On 12-04-25 10:11 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This fixes [YOCTO #1669]. Please pull into linux-yocto-3.2.
The following changes since commit 86d05af47be45c786c1823a76b6854fa8b411bec:
Bruce Ashfield (1):
Merge branch 'yocto/standard/base
On 12-04-25 8:59 PM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
That was my last version, you can google to get by msync zumeng
So feel free to merge it.
Sounds good, but we should still get the header updates, since the
first version merged into the tree already.
Bruce
Regards,
Zumeng
于 2012年04月25日 21:47, Bruce
On 12-04-26 02:48 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This fixes [YOCTO #310].
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.2.
merging. Will push a batch of kernel updates out later today.
Cheers,
Bruce
Thanks,
Tom
The following changes since commit
On 12-04-26 04:55 AM, rahul.sax...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rahul Saxenarahul.sax...@intel.com
Cover letter to update pvr patches.
A updated version of linux-3.0.0-cdv patch for pvr driver that
includes vaapi (Video Acceleration API) related fixes was recently released by
MeeGo.
A revert of the
On 12-04-26 04:55 AM, rahul.sax...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rahul Saxenarahul.sax...@intel.com
Cover letter to update pvr patches.
A updated version of linux-3.0.0-cdv patch for pvr driver that
includes vaapi (Video Acceleration API) related fixes was recently released by
MeeGo.
A revert of the
On 12-04-25 01:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-04-25 10:11 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This fixes [YOCTO #1669]. Please pull into linux-yocto-3.2.
The following changes since commit
86d05af47be45c786c1823a76b6854fa8b411bec:
Bruce Ashfield (1
-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:04 PM
To: Saxena, Rahul
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Bodke, Kishore K
Subject: Re: [kernel][PATCH 0/3] Cover letter to update pvr patches
On 12-04-26 04:55 AM, rahul.sax...@intel.com wrote:
From
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Thomas Fitzsimmons fitz...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
Are there plans in the Yocto roadmap to make the meta/scripts/kgit tools
generally usable?
I like the organization of the Yocto kernel repository and for my
embedded project I'm considering using the Yocto
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
wrote:
a potential training client of mine would like an intro embedded
linux course ideally on a
configuration.
Cheers,
Bruce
Best Regards,
Om Prakash Pal
From: Bruce Ashfield [bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:04 PM
To: Om Prakash PAL
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto
Prakash Pal
From: Om Prakash PAL
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 3:28 PM
To: Bruce Ashfield
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto.
Hi Bruce,
for porting of our local kernel,we have created an BSP layer
On 12-04-30 10:20 AM, Chris Tapp wrote:
I've got a BSP that has the following kernel configuration
linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend:
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := ${THISDIR}/${PN}:
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_mybsp = mybsp
KMACHINE_mybsp = yocto/standard/common-pc/base
SRC_URI += file://defconfig
On 12-05-01 06:12 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Update the PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.2.
Drop cfg/smp.scc as this is now included in common-pc.
Just having a look at the series now. Can you confirm for me if there
are 3 or 7 patches for n450 ? I see the other syslinux series has 7
patches, but only 3
On 12-05-02 10:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/02/2012 05:55 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-01 06:12 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Update the PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.2.
Drop cfg/smp.scc as this is now included in common-pc.
Just having a look at the series now. Can you confirm for me
On 12-05-02 11:35 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This adds a few new features, one for xhci-hcd and another for
amt/mei, and refactors some existing config options into a new
echi-hcd, which is then used in crownbay.
If this looks like the way to go,
On 12-05-03 09:50 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 08:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-02 11:35 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This adds a few new features, one for xhci-hcd and another for
amt/mei, and refactors some existing
On 12-05-03 05:42 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
How can I specify a machine defconfig for a linux recipe?
For example, if I set
# kernel provider
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = linux-omap3
and try to build my machine, I get the following
On 12-05-03 06:03 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-03 05:42 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
How can I specify a machine defconfig for a linux recipe?
For example, if I set
On 12-05-01 06:14 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
This somehow missed the 3.0 to 3.2 update. It is required for networking
on the sys940x BSP. Please apply to standard/base and derived branches.
The somehow .. is that I thought this made 3.2, and it didn't. This is
merged
here, and when I get back to
/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb,
do_kernel_configme) failed with exit code '1'
Waiting for 2 active tasks to finish:
0: gcc-cross-4.6.3+svnr184847-r23 do_compile (pid 14631)
1: eggdbus-native-0.6-r3 do_compile (pid 18130)
I googled and found Bruce Ashfield
http://search.gmane.org/?author=Bruce+Ashfieldsort
On 12-05-04 12:08 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Jim Ruckerjruc...@altera.com wrote:
In the project that I'm working on we have a recipes-bsp and recipes-kernel, and
when I try to build virtual/kernel I'm getting the following error. It looks to
me like
On 12-05-04 12:43 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 09:39 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/04/2012 09:35 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 09:24 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/03/2012 06:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-03 09:50 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Thu
On 12-05-04 9:00 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/04/2012 05:06 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 16:04 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/04/2012 03:07 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This adds a few new features, one each for usb/[xeou]hci-hcd
hours worth of
issues).
Are there any hints in the host system logs, or in the kernels do_install
log ?
Bruce
Best Regards,
Om Prakash Pal
From: Bruce Ashfield [bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 5:59 PM
To: Om Prakash PAL
Cc
On 12-05-06 12:53 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This adds a few new features, one each for usb/[xeou]hci-hcd and
another for amt/mei, and refactors existing config options into a new
usb/base, which are then used in crownbay.
v2: after suggestions from
On 12-05-06 11:48 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-06 12:53 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This adds a few new features, one each for usb/[xeou]hci-hcd and
another for amt/mei, and refactors existing config options into a new
usb/base, which
On 12-05-03 08:10 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/03/2012 03:29 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-01 06:14 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
This somehow missed the 3.0 to 3.2 update. It is required for networking
on the sys940x BSP. Please apply to standard/base and derived branches.
The somehow
On 12-05-03 06:46 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-01 06:13 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Please apply to linux-yocto-3.2 meta branch.
The following changes since commit
b14a08f5c7b469a5077c10942f4e1aec171faa9d:
meta: Clean up BSPs kernel config (2012-04-17 16:04:15 -0400)
are available
On 12-05-07 10:41 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure what the best place is to mail this (the YP list or oe-core
or oe-devel or ...)
Apologies if this is the wrong place.
The problem I'm facing is the following:
I have a kernel with some additional drivers that are not upstreamed
On 12-05-07 03:29 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/7 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-07 10:41 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure what the best place is to mail this (the YP list or oe-core
or oe-devel or ...)
Apologies if this is the wrong place.
The
On 12-05-08 03:18 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/7 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-07 03:29 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/7 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-07 10:41 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure what the best place
On 12-05-08 09:03 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/8 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-08 03:18 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/7 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-07 03:29 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/7 Bruce
On 12-05-08 5:37 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
More updates for meta-intel 1.2.
Please pull into linux-yocto 3.2.
merged and pushed out. I'll send the main recipe updates as part of
my next pull request, but they are available for you to use now.
On 12-05-09 10:11 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/8 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-08 09:03 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/8 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-08 03:18 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/7 Bruce
On 12-05-09 10:27 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/9 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-09 10:11 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Bruce, thanks a lot for your help! Greatly appreciated!
I've verified this at work and noticed that things are not exactly
working as
On 12-05-09 4:37 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
Linux-yocto build is failing for Cedartrail for the Master and denzil
branch.
Is it failing for any other BSPs?
Everything is fine here, this looks to be something specific with your
proxy setup injecting bad commands into the subshell.
Bruce
-yocto-3.0.24+git1+a4ac64fe873f08ef718e2849b88914725dc99c1c_1+81fd8c307997aff37916828dc8b4ef72f5d35a94-r4:
task do_patch: Failed
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:36 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc
On 12-05-11 03:07 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how to do a kernel rebuild after doing changing the .config using
bitbake -c menuconfig virtual/kernel
I've tried forcing a recompile using:
bitbake -ccompile -f virtual/kernel
that indeed rebuilds the kernel
However if I then do
On 12-05-11 08:51 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/11 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-11 03:07 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how to do a kernel rebuild after doing changing the .config
using
bitbake -c menuconfig virtual/kernel
I've tried forcing a
On 12-05-11 01:04 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Yes.
I saw the same failures too.
For some reason 3.0 kernel fetch failures started showing up for Cedartrail.
There is a discussion thread on this in the mailing list.
Bruce might be able to give some pointers on this.
Unfortunately not. From
On 12-05-11 09:12 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/11 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-11 08:51 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2012/5/11 Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 12-05-11 03:07 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how to do a
On 12-05-11 03:26 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:12 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/10/2012 05:59 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
Use the available ehci and uhci usb features and remove the associated
config settings from the top-level
On 12-05-10 09:00 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This set of patches factors out the policy vs hardware-related config
of the common-pc and common-pc-64 along with some meta-intel BSPs.
There are also a couple usb cleanups as well.
This is an RFC
On 12-05-12 03:42 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This set of patches factors out the policy vs hardware-related config
of the common-pc and common-pc-64 along with some meta-intel BSPs.
There are also a couple usb cleanups as well.
This is still an RFC
On 12-05-14 02:52 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
I'm trying to put a BSP together for an ARM system (Raspberry Pi, ARM1176JZF-S
CPU). However, when I try and build the kernel I am getting a build failure
when the kernel modules are compiled:
| CC [M] net/core/pktgen.o
|
On 12-05-15 05:15 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 14/05/12 19:52, Chris Tapp wrote:
I'm trying to put a BSP together for an ARM system (Raspberry Pi, ARM1176JZF-S
CPU).
I got the feeling that there might be multiple OE/RPI efforts going on
at the same time unaware of each other, e.g., I noticed
On 12-05-15 01:36 PM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On 15/05/12 16:44, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-15 05:15 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 14/05/12 19:52, Chris Tapp wrote:
I'm trying to put a BSP together for an ARM system (Raspberry Pi,
ARM1176JZF-S CPU).
I got the feeling
On 12-05-16 03:46 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On 15/05/12 19:07, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-15 01:36 PM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
Let me turn this question back at you then: is Yocto going to be doing
thorough QA for all of these HW platforms? Decent QA is what really
sets Yocto
On 12-05-16 11:55 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:50 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This set of patches factors out the policy vs hardware-related config
of the common-pc and common-pc-64 along with some meta-intel BSPs.
There are also a
On 12-05-16 03:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-16 11:55 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:50 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This set of patches factors out the policy vs hardware-related config
of the common-pc and common-pc-64 along
401 - 500 of 2361 matches
Mail list logo
