in Debian without removing yum.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
P.S: Please CC me, I'm not sure I'm subscribed.
Description: Add Python 3 compatibility
Author: Thomas Goirand
Forwarded: no
Last-Update: 2019-07-30
--- urlgrabber-3.10.2.orig/setup.py
+++ urlgrabber-3.10.2/setup.py
@@ -55,7
On 03/02/2012 03:55 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I'll try version 3.4.3, and if I have no issue, you wont hear
> from me! :)
>
Unfortunately, I still have the same issue with Yum 3.4.3.
Any clue why?
Thomas
___
Yum-devel mailing
On 03/02/2012 02:19 AM, James Antill wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 22:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to update yum from version 3.2.25 to 3.2.29 in Debian SID,
>> so that we have the latest before Wheezy is frozen.
>>
>
Hi,
I am trying to update yum from version 3.2.25 to 3.2.29 in Debian SID,
so that we have the latest before Wheezy is frozen.
Using yum 3.2.29, I ran the attached script. FYI, RPM is in version
4.9.1.2-1+b1. It seems everything goes well, and I believe that I got
CentOS installed, but then, at t
On 12/09/2011 04:22 PM, Grigory Batalov wrote:
> Usually I just do
> $ sudo yum install -y package-name
>
> (I have a repository of CentOS packages that I'd like to use in Debian.)
Are you seriously using yum at the same time as dpkg/apt, on the same
system?
Honestly, I never did that, and I nev
/opt
makes sense.
Since yum 3.2.25-1 is in Debian Stable, I wont be able to upgrade to the
latest version in there: I'll have to backport a specific, tiny patch
for it. I'd appreciate a lot your help as upstream author in doing that fix.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
Debian PGP: E4F0
On 03/03/2011 06:02 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> The only real fix to the issue is to eliminate the loop, ie fix the
> packaging.
>
> - Panu -
So, if I understand you correctly, the issue is in CentOS maintainers being
a bit silly, right? That doesn't help much though... Does any of you know
ho
Hi,
as you may know, I'm the Debian developer in charge for Yum. At my
company (GPLHost), we use yum for setting-up CentOS VMs for our
customers. While it works very well if the Xen dom0 is running Lenny, it
currently fails with the following output:
M Installing : pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.x86
ing to yum 3.2.27 will solve the issue?
- Is the issue only in python-urlgrabber?
Please let me know what you think, and what you believe I should do to
fix this RC bug.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
P.S: Please write to this email address that I will use from now on for
my Debian work, since I'
Hi,
Please look at this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yum/+bug/318782
First, what do you think of it? Second, does it make even sense to
package yum-updatesd in distro that are not using yum for their package
(like Debian and Ubuntu)? Would it make sense to completely remove it
h is always quite a nice thing.
Thanks for your attention,
Thomas Goirand
#!/bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 0002-Make-compatible-with-SQLite.dpatch by Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
##
## DP: Forward-ported old sqlite patch to make it compatible with SQLite
@DPATCH@
diff --git a/yum/sqlutils.
James Antill wrote:
>> Well, it IS installed in my server, and that is what is concerning me.
>>
>> -bash-3.2# yum search fastestmirror
>> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
>> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>> * addons: mirror.nus.edu.sg
>> * base: mirror.nus.edu.sg
>> * extras: mirror.n
Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> James Antill wrote:
>>> The above is in the old mirrorlist format and not in the metalink file
>>> format, why have you called it metalink?
>>> Yum looks for the string "/m
As I'm the maintainer of Yum in Debian, I wish to know what's the
current release schedule. How often is it released, and what's the plans
until next march.
The next Debian stable, code name Squeeze, is said to be feature freezed
on next march. At least that's the current target (we never really k
James Antill wrote:
> The above is in the old mirrorlist format and not in the metalink file
> format, why have you called it metalink?
> Yum looks for the string "/metalink" and if present assumes the
> mirrorlist is in metalink format (this is for compatibility reasons, and
> can't really be ch
Hi there,
This is a user question, not really for developers of yum, but I hope
you will forget me for that one. I've searched on the net, and didn't
get the answer I was looking for.
For our panel, we have the CentOS instructions here:
http://dtcsupport.gplhost.com/DTC-Xen/CentOS
It includes h
when it should.
Sorry that it took me sooo long to send these patches that I said I
would send earlier. I was quite busy with other stuffs.
Thomas
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 0006-yum.conf.5.dpatch by Thomas Goirand
##
## DP: This cleans all syntax errors in the man of yum.conf.5
Charlie Brady wrote:
>
> Hard to prove a negative - but there's no reference to "brace expansion"
> in http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html.
>
> Peter Seebach, in "Beginning Portable Shell Scripting: From Novice to
> Professional" (http://books.google.ca/books?i
Seth Vidal wrote:
>> This is NOT available in Debian, and my man page doesn't tell anything
>> about yearly. Would it hurt you guys to set it to monthly instead? You
>> could add a "rotate 12" option (or more) if you still want to keep 12
>> months of logs...
>
> I think the best solution here is
Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> I think someone is working on getting iniparse into debian
> http://code.google.com/p/iniparse/issues/detail?id=14&can=1
>
> It is used instead of the standard ConfigParser, because the it
> preserves the order, comments and formatting of the ini files, when
> written back t
To resume what has been said, I believe that:
0001-Patching-the-Makefile-so-it-works-with-bourne-shell.dpatch
should be applied, even though the name should have been:
0001-patching-the-makefile-to-remove-bashisme
0002-Make-compatible-with-SQLite.dpatch
should be investigated more
0003-Remove
James Antill wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 00:26 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>>> 0004: where exactly did you see there is a "yearly" option in
>> logrotate?
>>> man logrotate
>>>yearly Log files are rotated if the current year is not the sa
Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> Especially:
>> 0001: this one is very small and wont hurt
>
> Why is this necessary at all? Is there an install somewhere that doesn't
> support {}
When you just asked, I was not 100%, so I just t
yum.conf.5 is wrong, and needs to be
corrected thanks to this patch. Also documents the addition of 0005
Please let me know what can be added, and what you think can't, with
explanation if possible if rejected.
Thanks for your time, and consideration of these patches.
Thomas Goirand
#!/bin/sh
24 matches
Mail list logo
