Hello, It is hard to deduce anything based on this code excerpt,especially for those who know nothing about C# (like me),but what about resource maintaining?Do you free Content every time and create another one or reuse it?Or may be create new ones again and again?What about closing 0mq
Hi Ilja,
I also suspected it might be because of the non-closing of the socket at
the end of execution. So this means too many socket instances are left open
without doing anything. I've searched everywhere for the syntax of how to close
the socket in C# at the end of every execution but I
On 11/06/2011 09:50 PM, lanre lawal wrote:
I'm sure this question is pretty trivial for the mailing list but I've
searched everywhere in the documentation and examples section. I can't
find the Syntax for closing a socket anywhere. Also is there a full
documentation for the C# language that
2011/11/7 Daniel Cegiełka daniel.cegie...@gmail.com:
An interesting article about AMQP, OpenMAMA and massaging market:
OpenMAMA pitted against AMQP in battle system finance
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/31/messaging_system_fight/
Meanwhile in the real world...
-Pieter
07.11.2011, 13:54, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com:
However, adding the functionality is easy (have a look at other language
bindings for inspiration), so I suggest you add the function yourself
and ask clrzmq2 maintainers to merge it into the project.
Not sure such an attempt to bypass GC
On 11/07/2011 11:17 AM, Ilja Golshtein wrote:
07.11.2011, 13:54, Martin Sustriksust...@250bpm.com:
However, adding the functionality is easy (have a look at other language
bindings for inspiration), so I suggest you add the function yourself
and ask clrzmq2 maintainers to merge it into the
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
Other bindings for languages with GCs do the same thing. See, for
exmaple, here;
https://github.com/zeromq/jzmq/blob/master/src/org/zeromq/ZMQ.java#L334
Hi,
as far as I understand majority of the language with GC
On 11/07/2011 11:42 AM, Mikko Koppanen wrote:
as far as I understand majority of the language with GC leave the
closing to GC. Otherwise this would cause annoying issues where the
object for the socket is valid but the underlying socket is invalid.
There should be no need for explicit close
On 11/07/2011 07:52 AM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
An interesting article about AMQP, OpenMAMA and massaging market:
OpenMAMA pitted against AMQP in battle system finance
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/31/messaging_system_fight/
The article is a bit misguided as it presents OpenMAMA and
07.11.2011, 14:46, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com:
Think of, for exmaple, bound ports. If you close the socket you want the
port to be available for new sockets immediately rather than lingering on.
Sounds reasonable.
Coming back to topicstarter's issue, I doubt the issue is caused by GC.
Hi Guys,
What do you suggest as a resource maintaining strategy? The issue is really
persistent and I'm just wondering what could be the issue. Has anyone
experienced this kind of issue before too? Please guys I need urgent help.
Thanks
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo
We are ready to help, although there is not enough information about
* how applications crashed (backtrace is preferrable, errno is acceptable,
additional logging information is useful)
* topology (who crashed, who crashes)
* code (is the snippet provided inside code block? may be some references
When I say the system crashes, I don't mean my system where I'm running the
program from. I mean the system that my program is receiving the messages from.
So is it that system I should get the errors from?
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
-Original Message-
07.11.2011, 17:28, lawillas4e...@yahoo.com:
When I say the system crashes, I don't mean my system where I'm running the
program from. I mean the system that my program is receiving the messages
from. So is it that system I should get the errors from?
Exactly.
Besides this, explain why you
The thing is I watched the server for like an hour without running my program
and it was up. Now I noticed that whenever I run my program, it runs fine for
the first 10-20 minutes and all of a sudden the remote system crashes. This
perhaps confirms that my program causes the system to crash.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5115611/in-windows-does-the-exception-unknown-software-exception-0x4015-occurred
suggests 0x4015 means abort.
May be failed assertion?
07.11.2011, 17:51, lawillas4e...@yahoo.com:
The thing is I watched the server for like an hour without running my
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:10:52PM +0100, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
Great, I've applied these to zeromq2-1 and pushed back to github. When
I apply the patches to 3-0 there's a conflict (src/device.cpp is
deleted). Any chance you can make a pull request for 3-0 as well?
Sure, I should be able to.
Hi,
The assertion reporting problem may have been solved by this commit (I
assume Lenre is using 2.1.x): 19c865d3d7d6a4157205b4036e95e45955459a0b
For details have a look here:
https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq2-1/commit/19c865d3d7d6a4157205b4036e95e45955459a0b
Can you either apply the patch to
Please how do I apply the patch? I've downloaded the 2files
(src/err.cpp src/err.hpp). Do i need to overwrite them somewhere or do I need
to rebuild the ZMQ library after overwriting them. Please I need a guide on
this. Thanks Guys
Regards,
Olanrewaju Lawal
Web Developer / Programmer
Martin,
we have 0x4015 already.
May be via different path and may be without extra_info.
07.11.2011, 18:54, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com:
Hi,
The assertion reporting problem may have been solved by this commit (I
assume Lenre is using 2.1.x): 19c865d3d7d6a4157205b4036e95e45955459a0b
You need to overwrite these files before rebuild zmq library from sources (until someone is able to provide you with readymade binaries).To be honest I think you should get in touch with an experienced developer.07.11.2011, 19:00, "lanre lawal" lawillas4e...@yahoo.com:Please how do I apply the
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 08:50:59AM -0600, AJ Lewis wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:10:52PM +0100, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
Great, I've applied these to zeromq2-1 and pushed back to github. When
I apply the patches to 3-0 there's a conflict (src/device.cpp is
deleted). Any chance you can
Hi Ilja,
we have 0x4015 already.
You mean you have the patch applied already? What version are you using?
It seems that the patch was not yet released in either 2-1 or 3-0 release.
Martin
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Hi Martin,
I am not connected with topic starter,
though he reported 0x4015 exception against [unknown] version he uses.
07.11.2011, 19:42, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com:
Hi Ilja,
we have 0x4015 already.
You mean you have the patch applied already? What version are you using?
I'm using version 2.1.10. I've applied the patch now and I'll test my program
and see if the crashing still occurs.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: Ilja Golshtein ilej...@narod.ru
Sender: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
Date: Mon,
Guys,
The system still crashes even after I updated with the patch. What could
be wrong now?
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: Ilja Golshtein ilej...@narod.ru
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:45:43
To: lawillas4e...@yahoo.com; ZeroMQ
On 11/07/2011 05:31 PM, lawillas4e...@yahoo.com wrote:
The system still crashes even after I updated with the patch. What could be
wrong now?
The patch is meant to report the error in more Windows-friendly way.
Have you got any more details from the crash now?
Martin
Ok I'll contact the guy in charge of the server to send the details. I'll post
as soon as I have them.
--Original Message--
From: Martin Sustrik
To: lawillas4e...@yahoo.com
To: ZeroMQ development list
Cc: Ilja Golshtein
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Server Crashing due to ZMQ request
Sent:
On 11/06/2011 07:00 PM, MinRK wrote:
Can I ask what the relationship of 3.0 and 3.1 is now? Is 3.0
deprecated, and 3.1 just the current dev version?
I'm trying to figure out what I should be doing with pyzmq. I had
integrated some support for the LABEL code, which remains in 3.0, but I
as far as I understand majority of the language with GC leave the
closing to GC. Otherwise this would cause annoying issues where the
object for the socket is valid but the underlying socket is invalid.
There should be no need for explicit close as usually object going out
of scope
I really don't have an Idea of how to add the function myself as you said. My
core is not even C#, I'm just using it because of some restrictions to PHP.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: gonzalo diethelm gdieth...@dcv.cl
Sender:
Hi AJ,
Actually, everything compiles fine on AIX6.1 with zeromq3-0, provided
that I define _H_LOCALEDEF in the CXXFLAGS:
make CXXFLAGS+=-D_H_LOCALEDEF
Without that I get:
CXXlibzmq_la-connect_session.lo
In file included from session.hpp:25,
from
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:29:20PM +0100, Martin Sustrik wrote:
Hi AJ,
Actually, everything compiles fine on AIX6.1 with zeromq3-0, provided
that I define _H_LOCALEDEF in the CXXFLAGS:
make CXXFLAGS+=-D_H_LOCALEDEF
Without that I get:
CXXlibzmq_la-connect_session.lo
In file
On 11/07/2011 08:46 PM, AJ Lewis wrote:
namespace zmq
{
class msg_t;
struct i_engine
{
...
It does not
Hm. When experimentally trying to define global typedef for msg_t, the
above patch solved the issue with gcc compiler.
What compiler are you using?
Martin
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 08:51, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
On 11/06/2011 07:00 PM, MinRK wrote:
Can I ask what the relationship of 3.0 and 3.1 is now? Is 3.0
deprecated, and 3.1 just the current dev version?
I'm trying to figure out what I should be doing with pyzmq. I had
On 11/07/2011 09:24 PM, MinRK wrote:
Being of simple
mind, and little experience on internal 0MQ topics, what I really want
is the diff of this page: http://www.zeromq.org/docs:3-0 for 3.0 and
3.1.
Here's the page:
http://www.zeromq.org/docs:3-1
Martin
Hi,
I've been reading about zeromq, playing around with some code examples and think
it's great. Love it even. Moving forward I'm now considering this as the
technology of choice for a bigger project. I'm wondering, are there any
showcases of large-scale deployments of the zeromq technology? I
On 11/07/2011 10:05 PM, AJ Lewis wrote:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.0
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Maybe I need to
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
It's up to Pieter whether he wants to maintain 3-0 further.
Pieter, what do you think?
/me was expecting this to bounce back to me. I'm going to bounce this
back to the community since the only rationale for maintaining a
Option 2. I never really got far enough with 3.0 since I couldn't see a forward
path from 2.1 to 3.0 to 4.0.
Joshua
On Nov 7, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
It's up to Pieter whether he wants to maintain 3-0
i have nothing in production ... but would want a path from 2.1 to 3.1 and
predictable path (to the extent possible) going forward.
So ... option 2.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Joshua Foster jhaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Option 2. I never really got far enough with 3.0 since I couldn't see a
I don't believe this is correct, the correct way to close a Socket in
C# is to Dispose() it.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
On 11/07/2011 11:17 AM, Ilja Golshtein wrote:
07.11.2011, 13:54, Martin Sustriksust...@250bpm.com:
However, adding the
42 matches
Mail list logo
