On Jun 8, 2015, at 01:35, Arnaud Loonstra arn...@sphaero.org wrote:
On 06/06/2015 01:52 AM, MinRK wrote:
Without using ctypes, you could pass the objects through a namespace:
|# shared namespace
ns = {}
# sender
ns[id(obj)] = obj
pipe_out.send(struct.pack(b'Q',1))
# receiver
For pyzmq, it must work with VC9 (VS2008), for Python 2.7.
-MinRK
On Oct 9, 2014, at 18:08, Steven McCoy steven.mc...@miru.hk wrote:
I think it is easier now as they have more support than just MSVC2013 (C99
compat) when crypto was added to ZeroMQ.
On 9 October 2014 17:47, MinRK
what is zmq.zmq_version() on each?
-MinRK
On Dec 29, 2013, at 0:01, Thomas Johnson thomas.j.john...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider the following simple program:
#CUT HERE
#!/usr/bin/python
import zmq
context_push = zmq.Context(1)
socket_push = context_push.socket(zmq.PUSH)
By all means! A PR adding that as zmq.auth would be great.
-MinRK
On Dec 8, 2013, at 5:07, Chris Laws clawsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wanting to use ZMQ's security features in my pyzmq applications. As far
as I can tell the security API in pyzmq is pretty low level (sockopts and
write
On Sep 2, 2013, at 9:25, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
MinRK,
I've just pushed a patch that fixes authentication for PLAIN and
CURVE, and updated the test cases to match.
It all works as expected... :-)
One thing about CURVE authentication; client keys are passed to the
ZAP
I wouldn't actually recommend using the green poller, it seems to miss the
point. I would use a plain greenlet for each socket if possible.
-MinRK
On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:04, Brian Knox brian.k...@neomailbox.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(sorry about the new
Thanks for the report, I will look into whether I have introduced a performance
degradation in the last few iterations.
-MinRK
On Jun 24, 2013, at 11:27, Brian Knox bri...@talksum.com wrote:
It's been awhile since I've used pyzmq, and I'm running into a performance
issue using
On Mar 11, 2013, at 13:13, Jonathan Kamens jkam...@quantopian.com wrote:
Greetings,
With PyZMQ versions prior to 13.0.0, we were running into problems with
certain PyZMQ calls getting interrupted by restartable signals (e.g.,
SIGALRM) used by our application. We fixed this problem like
On Dec 29, 2012, at 1:27, Maxa Jean Aimee maxajeanai...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have an error when i attempted to update my zeromq to the new version 3.2
This is the ouput that I have:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
File
On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Hello all,
I've done some tests with pyzmq to check if ZQM sets the CLOEXEC flag on
its file descriptors. During the tests I ran into several issues that
might be bugs in ZMQ or pyzmq.
My setup
OS: Ubuntu 12.04
On Jun 5, 2012, at 9:56 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:01 AM, MinRK benjami...@gmail.com wrote:
I know RC/beta terminology is just semantics, but are we really going
straight to stable with no betas with a half-dozen relatively untested new
features?
Wow, debug Python 3 on 64b Windows is *far* outside my home court.
I guess my first question would have to be: can you build other extensions
properly?
-MinRK
On Apr 23, 2012, at 23:04, Gargi Das gargi@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am facing a problem when i am trying to build pyzmq
On Nov 15, 2011, at 12:45, Chuck Remes cremes.devl...@mac.com wrote:
On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:36 PM, MinRK wrote:
e.g.
struct sequence_id {
uint64 number;
uchar uuid[16];
};
Is this all right? Or is there a better way to accomplish this framing?
cr
I have a general question
To build python extensions, you need the Python headers with 'apt-get install
python-dev'.
-MinRK
On Jul 25, 2011, at 13:36, Antonio Teixeira eagle.anto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Guys/Gals.
I have tried to install pyzmq in ubuntu 11.04
Linux ubuntu 2.6.38-10-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Tue
It was entirely an accident, due to my lack of experience on Windows. I will
push replacements, later today.
Thanks!
-MinRK
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:06, Ben James bmja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently found that there are Windows installers for pyzmq at
On Mar 22, 2011, at 16:31, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:08 AM, MinRK benjami...@gmail.com wrote:
I use PAIR quite a bit, because many of my small cases really are
symmetric a=b connections (not REQ/REP pattern). Frankly, I can
easily use XREQ for both
On Nov 17, 2010, at 0:15, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
Summary: even if we can figure out how to make message level security
bulletproof, there are some serious performance issues.
Great analysis!
At the moment I see 2 solutions to the performance problem:
1.
-development stable release.
--eric
On 11/12/2010 09:46 PM, Min RK wrote:
You are using the current development branch, the website points to our
github development branch, and we haven't cut a release since 2.0.8, due to
refactoring and time.
We have one feature pending review, then we
You did not download a stable release, you downloaded our current development
branch. If you get the code via git, it is not a release.
It is an imprecise message: you need cython to develop the code *or* to build
from our development repository. You checked out our development branch, which
Your cython is broken if you are seeing that error. How did you install cython?
-MinRK
On Nov 12, 2010, at 20:17, eric e...@ericjbell.com wrote:
I have a related problem ... I am unable to build pyzmq following the
instructions for non-development release. Specifically:
I am trying to
On 11/12/2010 08:20 PM, Min RK wrote:
Your cython is broken if you are seeing that error. How did you install
cython?
-MinRK
On Nov 12, 2010, at 20:17, erice...@ericjbell.com wrote:
I have a related problem ... I am unable to build pyzmq following the
instructions for non-development
There's no encrypted bit or anything. This isn't 'Encrypted ZMQ', it's just an
object that encrypts messages prior to sending them. Think of it more as a
wrapper than anything. The messaging library has no sense of whether a message
is encrypted or not, you have to specify that in user code:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:51, Burak Arslan burak.ars...@arskom.com.tr wrote:
On 11/02/10 15:34, Brian Granger wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Burak Arslan burak.ars...@arskom.com.tr
wrote:
On 11/02/10 10:31, Min RK wrote:
There's no encrypted bit or anything. This isn't 'Encrypted ZMQ
23 matches
Mail list logo
