It looks like it's not appending the "dynamic" (or "static") when looking
for libzmq.lib.
I'm attaching the log file. (I don't know if that will work on this list,
so if it fails I'll email it to you directly.)
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Pieter Hin
I had assumed that, since Visual Studio solutions were provided, CMake
would not be useful for configuring builds on Windows. I would be happy to
learn that my assumption was erroneous.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Sergei Nikulov
wrote:
> 2016-02-05 11:08 GMT+03:00 Jihad Mahmoud :
> > Hello A
.
-- Scott
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Jihad Mahmoud
wrote:
> Hello All
>
> I am using ZMQ for the first time and while I was following the
> instructions for installing it on Windows libzmq\builds\msvc\msvc.sln
> wasn't found. I assumed the libmzq in VS2010 is the alternativ
the library, I would guess based
on looking over their code) so it's not a problem to me that they don't
actually link properly, but it may interest someone else to look into. I'm
happy to help where I can.
Cheers,
-- Scott
___
zero
uration files
were.
This setup is a bit confusing, and I feel like it wouldn't hurt to throw in
a couple sentences for building on Windows.
Cheers,
Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
ost->h_name? strdup (host->h_name): NULL;
to
return host && host->h_name? strdup (host->h_name): NULL;
Thanks,
Scott
P.S. Sorry, I don't have a GitHub account so I can't send a pull request.
Hopefully this fix is small enough that this won't be necessary.
P.P.S
ocket is
in the CONNECTED state before publishing. However, even with the socket
in the CONNECTED state, the first few messages are usually lost.
Does ZMQ_EVENT_CONNECTED actually mean that the connection is fully
established and ready for pubs? Or something lesser?
Thanks,
Scott
P.S. Sorry
On 1/28/15, 12:34 PM, "McMillan, Scott A"
wrote:
>If I understand the documentation correctly, ZMQ_LINGER will not help
>because the program itself exits.
Sorry to respond to myself, but I may have just gotten confused by the
documentation on linger.
The zmq-setsockopt docume
t poll that and only exit when there
are no pending messages.
Or is the only reliable method to have the subscriber send an ack and not
let the publisher exit until it receives the ack?
Thanks,
Scott
* 100KB will consistently reproduce the issue.
___
In the following sample code from website, you can get inconsistent
results since 'getsockopt' stores and (int) 0 or 1 in the thing
pointed at with the &more reference, which in this case is an int64 as
opposed int32.
That said, as you can see the function does dutifully set the length
of the valu
Understand and agree with all of the above re: IP address.
However, some sort of 'source transport specific information' (there's
always some unique identifier associated w/ the transport) could be useful
(sometimes it would be IP address). That said - I think the logging /
debugging support satis
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
> As a side note: The monitoring interface exposes the IP address. You
> can use that to monitor who connects (for logging purposes).
>
Well that's useful to know!
To be clear, we aren't interested in using IP for security purposes, b
chine was doing this.
Is there a design reason that we lose this information in the area between
plain ol sockets and ZMQ messages getting delivered to the application?
Thanks for your patience and such a great library!
-Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing
o use multicast, then the second line would be replaced
with something like:
zmq_bind (publisher, "pgm://...");
Am I understanding this correctly?
Thanks,
Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
ry and get a feel for how this should be handled.
Both fmq_client_new() and fmq_server_new() create contexts for themselves
before spawning their threads. The track.c program creates both a client
and a server and its mainline never creates a context (or destroys one).
What am I missing?
Thanks,
--Scott
___
Thanks, but zyre_log.h isn't installed in /usr/local/include. I've
commented on https://github.com/zeromq/zyre/issues/147. Was it intended to
be installed?
Thanks,
--Scott
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> The logging API is defined in zyre_log.h; i
Is there an example anywhere on how logging can be done from a zyre node?
What I mean is if I do a zyre_new(), zyre_start(), then wait for a peer
node with "X-ZRELOG" header to arrive, how do I send log messages to the
logger peer?
Thank
.c: In function 'zyre_peer_connect':
zyre_peer.c:125:9: error: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Werror=format-security]
These are all on zsocket_connect calls.
Thanks,
--Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.or
these bindings work with 4.0.4? If not, is there any
expectation that they will be (and if so, when?).
Thanks,
Scott
[2] https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/z
Hi all. I have a project where filemq seems like it would be an ideal fit.
Is anyone using this in a production environment? If so, do you have any
feedback, either positive or negative?
Thanks,
--Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev
..I'm just coming in trying to understand what I can depend upon as
a new user of 0mq and the specific lang bindings.
Thanks again,
Scott
-- Pieter
[1] http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:22
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lis
dn't find it here [1].
Thanksinadvance,
Scott
[1] http://zeromq.org/bindings:java
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Does anyone have some insight as to how this assert could fail if multipart
messages are all-or-nothing?
Original message
From: Stew Scott
Date: 12/21/2013 12:07 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Subject: [zeromq-dev] Failed assert in fq.cpp line 102
We are
d not be possible to fail in this manner.
Can someone with more familiarity with this part of the code tell me under what
conditions this assert would fire?
Stew Scott
Core Engineer
Mob 303.521.8755
steward.sc...@aventurahq.com
1001 Seventeenth Street, Suite SL-100
Denver, Colorado 8020
different port if our software is going to be installed on a
device where that port is already taken. I notice in the comments of the
function that it mentions using a dynamic port, but doesn't actually do so.
Stew Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zerom
MInRk noted that:
You cannot continue to use zmq sockets after a fork - you have to take care
in your application that no sockets created before the fork will be [not be]
used by any calls in the child process.
Thanks, that makes sense. But can anyone provide guidance in how to do that?
We have a system which uses Python multiprocessing to run multiple simulations
concurrently in child processes, with main server <-> child process
communication using multiprocessing. This works fine standalone.
For a GUI, we use zeromq and tornado for communications between the main server
an
I've got a app which works good. Now I need to make
it fault tolerant.
In my polling loop, how can I verify that a connection
is still valid?
scott
--
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
z
more graceful than
than calling zmq_recv. Also for loadbalancing
in other circumstances, this could be a great
feature.
scott
--
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
ant to use SQNS, then do I need to set the MAX BIT rate so it knows
how long to wait? If I only want it to wait 1ms, I don't see how I can do
that with PGM_RXW_SECS
Thanks again for the help, -S
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Steven McCoy wrote:
> On 14 August 2012 21:53, Scott wrote:
&
brary just to get
this sort of behavior when we need it; especially when the rest of the
library is full of so much awesome.
-Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
OMQ is amazing. It has changed the way I do things.
Thank you. And great read :)
- Scott
On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:27 AM, tlrx wrote:
> Just discovered 0MQ few weeks ago, and I'm already using it.
>
> Thanks for this great project.
>
> -- Tanguy
>
> Le 10 novembre
try setting found at:
*HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters*
I think you can set it as low as 30s and the default is 120s, so 30s will be
much less annoying if you are constantly creating/deleting listening
sockets.
Scott
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:00 AM, wrote:
> Send
something is wrong with
mutlipart messages.
Scott
#include
#include
#include
//#define USE_PGM
zmq::context_t cxt(1);
void worker(void) {
zmq::socket_t pub(cxt, ZMQ_PUB);
_int64 Rate= 1;
_int64 LB
those parts are garbled.
I am debugging further now to see if I can dig up exactly where the issue
is.
Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Okie doke, I've created LIBZMQ-240:
https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-240
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Thanks Martin! That works perfectly.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 05:13 PM, Scott Asher wrote:
>
> How does this code ever work? What am I missing here? I have compiled
>> both OpenPGM and ZMQ 2.1.7 in x64.
>>
>
> Can
I missing here? I have compiled both
OpenPGM and ZMQ 2.1.7 in x64.
Thanks,
Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
issue is without
more info?
Scott
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:40 AM, wrote:
> Send zeromq-dev mailing list submissions to
>zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
t!
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Steven McCoy wrote:
> On 4 January 2011 04:41, Scott wrote:
>>
>> Has there been much historical discussion about UNRELIABLE multicast
>> PUB/SUB? We certainly have applications that just use OSC/UDP
>> multicast, since it's bette
Has there been much historical discussion about UNRELIABLE multicast
PUB/SUB? We certainly have applications that just use OSC/UDP
multicast, since it's better for the application to get the latest
data if it didn't get a previous message; but I'd rather migrate
everything to zmq!
On Mon, Jan 3, 2
22 December 2010 01:34, Scott wrote:
>
>> >> -DCONFIG_HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY=1 -DCONFIG_HAVE_FTIME
>> >
>> > I don't think these should be here for Darwin, the latter two are
>> covered
>> > by pgm/impl/features.h.
>>
>> Yes they are - bu
* files in
openpgm, and put them somewhere in the zeromq tree in an autotools
friendly manner, so it would keep them from interfering with each
other, and it would make tracking the openpgm folks easier.
-Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lis
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Steven McCoy wrote:
> On 21 December 2010 16:26, Scott wrote:
>>
>> +
>>
>> +PGMEXTRASOURCE = \
>> + ../foreign/openpgm/@pgm_basename@/openpgm/pgm/getprotobyname.c \
>> + ../foreign/openpgm/@p
rent build, and this supresses the inclusion
of impl/features.h
Thanks for the useful feedback. This is my first time in autotools
land and it's a little overwhelming. :)
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Mikko Koppanen
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Scott wrote:
>>
the format of
the changes, or if folks think I should make an OSX branch?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Scott wrote:
> Hey folks... I added support for OpenPGM on OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard),
> here's what it involved:
>
> 1) latest openpgm -- configure.in conditionally
y) in the way of
testing. But I'd rather get your feedback sooner than later, so I can
do this in a way that is most compatible w/ the awesome zeromq ethos!
-Scott
--patch follows inline below--
>From 167544fb9e3622781e89d05fead5754e147710f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Watso
d
non-deterministically (which makes it very tough to debug). Figured I would
mention it in case anyone had comments (about what could be going on). If
it keeps up, I will try to produce a minimal test case. Will require me
understanding the underlying code stack
Sure, but we should hash out what the best solution is.
The Java binding has done more wrapping than the C/C++ underlying ZeroMQ
code so to expose all of the functionality we either do some unwrapping (or
just expose the details by making them public), or we write additional
wrapper functions (e.g
2) You can register a socket twice because your register
functions have no existence check. I don't know what the behavior is here
(haven't tested it). On the Java side I basically have to do a lot of
recreating pollers that I don't have to d
Hello,
Just querying about expecting behavior in 2.1.0. If I'm connecting a
ZMQ_PAIR and I bind() one end and then send() before I connect the other
end, my send() blocks, even though I've set HWM on the socket to 0, and I've
got ZMQ_NOBLOCK being set.
Is this e
To be clear - when I refer to "No Error" -- this is the message I get
back from zmq_strerror().
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Scott Asher wrote:
> I'm receiving this error thrown from zmq_poll after I destroy a
> socket, then replace the socket within my zmq::pollit
I'm receiving this error thrown from zmq_poll after I destroy a
socket, then replace the socket within my zmq::pollitem_t structure.
Any ideas what is going on? The "No Error" descriptor is not terribly
helpful!
Scott
___
zeromq-dev mail
re than ~5
external clients connected, leave them connected, and then restart the
server. I apologize for not being able to isolate it more, but it's
not easy to reproduce. I figured I would mail the list to see if
anyone has experience with this error and had any obvious suggestions.
the change?
Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Hi Pieter, thanks for your quick response.
>Scott,
>
>1. what precise socket types are you using?
>2. afaik you do not need noblock on a sndmore
>
>-Pieter
So, the "idiot" alert should be active (i.e. I am an idiot). I have a
bunch of wrapper code and in my base co
ore is simply a wrapper which calls socket.send with ZMQ_NOBLOCK
& ZMQ_SNDMORE.
The code above blocks until at least 1 sub is connected, then works
fine. Any ideas? Am I doing something dumb?
Thanks,
Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@l
Does ZMQ obscure this? zmq_msg_t doesn't
seem to contain it, and I couldn't find any useful documentation.
Thanks in advance!
Scott
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
58 matches
Mail list logo
