[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
But only if compression is turned on for a filesystem.
Of course, and the default is off.
However I think it would be good to have an API so application can
decide what to compress and what not.
I agree that an API would be good. However I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
But only if compression is turned on for a filesystem.
Of course, and the default is off.
However I think it would be good to have an API so application can
decide what to compress and what not.
I agree that an API would be good. However I
Can that same method be used to figure out what files changed between
snapshots?
Wout.
On 22 May 2006, at 08:25, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:23:02PM -0600, Gregory Shaw wrote:
DATASET OBJECT RANGE
1b 2402lvl=0 blkid=1965
I haven't found
hey all,
I just posted some stuff I'd been playing around with wrt. more desktop
integration of ZFS functionality, full story at:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/timf?entry=zfs_on_your_desktop
it's not much, but it's a start...
cheers,
tim
[ Oh, and if you
Hello Darren,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 11:12:15 AM, you wrote:
DJM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
But only if compression is turned on for a filesystem.
Of course, and the default is off.
However I think it would be good to have an API so application can
decide what to
Robert Milkowski wrote:
The problem is that with stronger compression algorithms due to
performance reasons I want to decide which algorithms and to what
files ZFS should try to compress. For some files I write a lot of data
even if they are compressing quite good i don't want it - too much CPU
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Wout Mertens wrote:
Can that same method be used to figure out what files changed between
snapshots?
To figure out what files changed, we need to (a) figure out what object
numbers changed, and (b) do the object number to file name translation.
The
Just a note about build 39. I tried Tim's smreg add suggestion and it worked, I
now see the ZFS Admin page. But when I click on the link, the next page shows:
Application Error
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /jsp/zfsmodule/DevicesTree.jsp(51,2) The end
tag /cc:i18nbundle is unbalanced
I
James Dickens wrote:
Hi
I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
take 5000 snapshots its his filesystem, let him. If he wants to
Hi,
I have these two pools, four luns each. One has two mirrors x two luns,
the other is one mirror x 4 luns.
I am trying to figure out what the pro's and cons are of these two configs.
One thing I have noticed is that the single mirror 4 lun config can
survive as many as three lun
Hello Darren,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 4:19:05 PM, you wrote:
DJM Robert Milkowski wrote:
The problem is that with stronger compression algorithms due to
performance reasons I want to decide which algorithms and to what
files ZFS should try to compress. For some files I write a lot of data
Hello Tom,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 9:46:24 PM, you wrote:
TG Hi,
TG I have these two pools, four luns each. One has two mirrors x two luns,
TG the other is one mirror x 4 luns.
TG I am trying to figure out what the pro's and cons are of these two configs.
TG One thing I have noticed is that
On 5/23/06, Robert Milkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello James,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 6:43:11 PM, you wrote:
JD Hi
JD I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
JD so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
JD space how ever he see's fit,
Hello Roland,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:31:37 PM, you wrote:
RM Darren J Moffat wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to
Hello Tom,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:37:31 PM, you wrote:
TG Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Tom,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 9:46:24 PM, you wrote:
TG Hi,
TG I have these two pools, four luns each. One has two mirrors x two luns,
TG the other is one mirror x 4 luns.
TG I am trying to figure
Hello Roch,
Monday, May 22, 2006, 3:42:41 PM, you wrote:
RBPE Robert Says:
RBPE Just to be sure - you did reconfigure system to actually allow larger
RBPE IO sizes?
RBPE Sure enough, I messed up (I had no tuning to get the above data); So
RBPE 1 MB was my max transfer sizes. Using 8MB
Darren J Moffat wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
Hi
I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
take 5000 snapshots its his filesystem, let
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:34:30PM -0700, Jeff Victor wrote:
* When you share a ZFS fs via NFS, what happens to files and
filesystems that exceed the limits of NFS?
What limits do you have in mind? I'm not an NFS expert, but I think
that NFSv4 (and probably v3) supports 64-bit file sizes, so
18 matches
Mail list logo
