I understand what you are saying and have had the same problem. I used the
fix that I mentioned to fix this problem on 2 of my production DB systems.
On 12/28/06, Jason Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I should clarify. Say I have a zfs with the mount point /u00 that I
import on the system.
I should clarify. Say I have a zfs with the mount point /u00 that I import on
the system. When it creates the /u00 directory on the UFS root, it's created
with 700, and then the zfs is mounted and it appears to have the permissions of
the root of the zfs. 755 in this case.
But, if a non-ro
The solution that I am going to give you has worked on ufs and vxfs for me
and I do not see why it would not work on zfs.
Share out the directory that you are having problems with lets say /opt.
Once its shared mount it to /a. Then you can do the chmod on /a then umount
/a and you should have fix
After importing some pools after a re-install of the OS, i hit that "..:
Permission denied" problem. I figured out I could unmount, chmod, and mount to
fix it but that wouldn't be a good situation on a production box. Is there
anyway to fix this problem without unmounting?
This message pos
When messing around with zfs trying to break it, I creating a new pool using
files on an existing zfs filesystem. It seem to work fine until I created a
snapshot of the original filesystem and then tried to destroy the pool using
the files. The system appeared to deadlock and had to be reboote
Thanks for all the hard work on ZFS performance fixes George! U3 works
great.
- Luke
On 12/28/06 9:18 AM, "George Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that Solaris 10 11/06 is available, I wanted to post the complete list of
> ZFS features and bug fixes that were included in that release.
I think ZFS might be too smart here. The feature we like is that ZFS
will find the devices no matter what their path is. This is very much
a highly desired feature. If there are multiple paths to the same LUN,
then it does expect an intermediary to handle that: MPxIO, PowerPath, etc.
Unfortunat
storage-disk wrote:
Hi there
I have 3 questions regarding zfs.
1. what are zfs packages?
SUNWzfsr, SUNWzfskr, and SUNWzfsu. Note that ZFS has dependencies on
other components of Solaris so installing just the packages in not
supported.
2. what services need to be started in order for
Now that Solaris 10 11/06 is available, I wanted to post the complete list of
ZFS features and bug fixes that were included in that release. I'm also
including the necessary patches for anyone wanting to get all the ZFS features
and fixes via patches (NOTE: later patch revision may already be av
Thanks for the reply!
As it turns out I ran a parity check on the suspect 3511... sure enough it
popped and error! So ZFS did detect the problem with the 3511...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@open
Hi there
I have 3 questions regarding zfs.
1. what are zfs packages?
2. what services need to be started in order for zfs working properly?
3. Is there an explanation for zfs label> This is the out put from zdb -l
/dev/dsk/C_t_d. I'd like to know what they mean each line. I have some idea
wha
Hello John,
Thursday, December 28, 2006, 12:59:34 PM, you wrote:
J> Ok... guess I answered my own question... LOL!
J> I did the find with the -inum... gave me a file name... so i did:
J> tsmsun1 - /tsmsrv1_pool >dd if=000203db.bfs of=/dev/null bs=128k
J> read: I/O error
J> 64581+0 records in
J>
Ok... guess I answered my own question... LOL!
I did the find with the -inum... gave me a file name... so i did:
tsmsun1 - /tsmsrv1_pool >dd if=000203db.bfs of=/dev/null bs=128k
read: I/O error
64581+0 records in
64581+0 records out
So it would appear the file is poo-poo
Now the intere
Background:
Large ZFS pool built on a couple of Sun 3511 SATA arrays. RAID-5 is done in the
3511s. ZFS is non-redundant. We have been using this setup for a couple of
months now with no issues.
Problem:
Yesterday afternoon we started getting checksum errors. There have been no
hardware errors
On 27-Dec-06, at 9:45 PM, George Wilson wrote:
Siegfried,
Can you provide the panic string that you are seeing? We should be
able to pull out the persistent error log information from the
corefile. You can take a look at spa_get_errlog() function as a
starting point.
This is the pani
15 matches
Mail list logo
