Nathan,
Keep in mind iSCSI target is only in OpenSolaris at this time.
On 05/30/2007 10:15 PM, Nathan Huisman wrote:
= QUESTION #1
What is the best way to mirror two zfs pools in order to achieve a sort
of HA storage system? I don't want to have to physically swap my disks
into another
I second that... I am trying to figure out what is missing so that I
can use ZFS exclusively... right now as far as I know two major
obstacles are no support from installer and issues with live update.
Are both of those expected to be resolved this year?
On 5/30/07, Carl Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been using the zfsbootkit to modify my jumpstart images. As far as
I know, the kit is the current process for zfs boot until further
notice.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/install/files/zfsboot-kit-20060418.i386.tar.bz2
See readme in the package.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 02:06 -0700,
Since you are doing iSCSI and may not be running ZFS on the initiator
(client) then I highly recommend that you run with IPsec using at least
AH (or ESP with Authentication) to protect the transport. Don't assume
that your network is reliable. ZFS won't help you here if it isn't
running on th
i wanted to know how does ZFS finds an entry of a file from its dirctory
object.
anylinks to the code will be highly appriciated.
thankx ®ards
kanishk
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinf
On Thu, 31 May 2007, David Anderson wrote:
snip .
Other:
-Others have reported that Sil3124 based SATA expansion cards work well with
Solaris.
[Sorry - don't mean to hijack this interesting thread]
I believe that there is a serious bug with the si3124 driver that has
not been addre
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Since you are doing iSCSI and may not be running ZFS on the initiator
(client) then I highly recommend that you run with IPsec using at least AH
(or ESP with Authentication) to protect the transport. Don't assume that
your network is reliable. ZFS
Al Hopper wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Since you are doing iSCSI and may not be running ZFS on the initiator
(client) then I highly recommend that you run with IPsec using at
least AH (or ESP with Authentication) to protect the transport. Don't
assume that your network
Kanishk,
Directories are implemented as ZAP objects.
Look at the routines in that order :
- zfs_lookup()
- zfs_dirlook()
- zfs_dirent_lock()
- zap_lookup
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Sanjeev.
kanishk wrote:
i wanted to know how does ZFS finds an entry of a file from its
dirctory object.
anyli
The parameters are:
maxphys=0x20, sd_max_xfer_size = 0x20 og sd_max_xfer_size = 0x20
Can i be sure that the IO transfer is 2MB or ?
I wants to lign up my Sun ST6140 for optimal performance and therefore needs to
know the transfer size.
This message posted from opensolaris.or
I am running the zfsboot from b62. So far, it has been recommended that I
not upgrade to a newer build.
Malachi
On 5/31/07, Mike Dotson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been using the zfsbootkit to modify my jumpstart images. As far as
I know, the kit is the current process for zfs boot until
Erik Lund wrote:
The parameters are:
maxphys=0x20, sd_max_xfer_size = 0x20 og sd_max_xfer_size = 0x20
Can i be sure that the IO transfer is 2MB or ?
Use iostat or another tool (DTrace iosnoop.d) to see for sure.
Note that these are upper limits...
I wants to lign up my Sun S
It is not possible to use send and receive of the pool is not imported. It is
however possible to use send and receive when the file system is not mounted.
--chris
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@ope
On 5/31/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since you are doing iSCSI and may not be running ZFS on the initiator
(client) then I highly recommend that you run with IPsec using at least
AH (or ESP with Authentication) to protect the transport. Don't assume
that your network is reliabl
Carl's request for a "current state of play" is a reasonable
one. I have modified this page:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/netinstall/
to include a list of status updates. I will keep it current
so that anyone who wants to know how to install zfs boot
using a netinstall can
Hi Folks,
how can i guarantee consistency for the ZFS snapshots?.
If i am running a db or any other app on my ZFS and want to take a snapshot is
there is any filesystem equivalent command to quiesce the ZFS before taking a
snapshot or do i have to rely on the app itself?.
Can i do something like
ganesh wrote:
Hi Folks,
how can i guarantee consistency for the ZFS snapshots?.
If i am running a db or any other app on my ZFS and want to take a snapshot is
there is any filesystem equivalent command to quiesce the ZFS before taking a
snapshot or do i have to rely on the app itself?.
You al
For background on what this is, see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24416#24416
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=25200#25200
=
zfs-discuss 05/01 - 05/15
=
Size of all threads during per
zfs-boot crowd:
I said I'd try to come up with a procedure for liveupgrading
the netinstalled zfs-root setup, but I haven't found time to
do so yet (I'm focusing on getting this supported in install
for real). So while I hate to retreat into the "I never said
you could upgrade this configuration
> how can i guarantee consistency for the ZFS snapshots?.
Filesystem consistency or application/data consistency?
> If i am running a db or any other app on my ZFS and want to take a
> snapshot is there is any filesystem equivalent command to quiesce the
> ZFS before taking a snapshot or do i hav
Just a quick question. If I create a raidz pool but then later find that I need
more space I can add another raidz set to the pool but what happens to data
already in the pool? Does a relayout occur or does zfs work towards balancing
I/O to the pool across the 2 raidz sets only as new data is wr
> Just a quick question. If I create a raidz pool but then later find
> that I need more space I can add another raidz set to the pool but
> what happens to data already in the pool? Does a relayout occur or
> does zfs work towards balancing I/O to the pool across the 2 raidz
> sets only as new dat
Al Hopper 提到:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, David Anderson wrote:
snip .
Other:
-Others have reported that Sil3124 based SATA expansion cards work
well with Solaris.
[Sorry - don't mean to hijack this interesting thread]
I believe that there is a serious bug with the si3124 driver that h
On 31 May, 2007 - Vic Engle sent me these 0,6K bytes:
> Just a quick question. If I create a raidz pool but then later find
> that I need more space I can add another raidz set to the pool but
> what happens to data already in the pool? Does a relayout occur or
> does zfs work towards balancing I/
Hi folks,
We have the following disks :and we want to create a STRIPE
c7t2d0 c7t3d0 c7t4d0 c7t5d0 c7t8d0 c7t9d0 c8t2d0 c8t3d0 c8t4d0 c8t5d0 c8t8d0
c8t9d0
What we would like to measure is how the following two STRIPES perform
STRIPE ( Created using Solaris Volume Manager )
STRIPE created wit
Durga Deep Tirunagari wrote:
Hi folks,
We have the following disks :and we want to create a STRIPE
c7t2d0 c7t3d0 c7t4d0 c7t5d0 c7t8d0 c7t9d0 c8t2d0 c8t3d0 c8t4d0 c8t5d0 c8t8d0
c8t9d0
What we would like to measure is how the following two STRIPES perform
STRIPE ( Created using Solaris Volum
I've had at least some success (tried it once so far) doing a BFU to cloned
filesystem from a b62 zfs root system, I could probably document that if
there is interest.
I have not tried taking a new ISO and installing the new packages ontop of a
cloned fileystem though.
On 5/31/07, Lori Alt <[EMA
Sorry to bother you but something is not clear to me regarding this process..
Ok, lets sat I have two internal disks (73gb each) and I am mirror them... now I
want to replace those two mirrored disks into one LUN that is on SAN and it is
around 100gb. Now I do meet one requirement of having more
Richard Elling wrote:
Durga Deep Tirunagari wrote:
Hi folks,
We have the following disks :and we want to create a STRIPE
c7t2d0 c7t3d0 c7t4d0 c7t5d0 c7t8d0 c7t9d0 c8t2d0 c8t3d0 c8t4d0
c8t5d0 c8t8d0 c8t9d0
What we would like to measure is how the following two STRIPES perform
STRIPE ( C
Jason King wrote:
I've had at least some success (tried it once so far) doing a BFU to
cloned filesystem from a b62 zfs root system, I could probably document
that if there is interest.
Yep, been there too, weather's nice :-)
http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/an_easy_way_to_manage
(and previ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
Durga Deep Tirunagari wrote:
Hi folks,
We have the following disks :and we want to create a STRIPE
c7t2d0 c7t3d0 c7t4d0 c7t5d0 c7t8d0 c7t9d0 c8t2d0 c8t3d0 c8t4d0
c8t5d0 c8t8d0 c8t9d0
What we would like to measure is how the following two
Is it possible to give a user control of a ZFS filesystem such that the user
can create their own file systems "within" it, take snapshots, etc.?
Thanks,
Haik
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensola
Hi Mike,
more thoughts below...
Ellis, Mike wrote:
Hey Richard, thanks for sparking the conversation... This is a very
interesting topic (especially if you take it out of the HPC "we need
1000 servers to have this minimal boot image" space into general
purpose/enterprise computing)
CF card
Krzys wrote:
Sorry to bother you but something is not clear to me regarding this
process.. Ok, lets sat I have two internal disks (73gb each) and I am
mirror them... now I want to replace those two mirrored disks into one
LUN that is on SAN and it is around 100gb. Now I do meet one requirement
Haik Aftandilian wrote:
Is it possible to give a user control of a ZFS filesystem such that the user can create
their own file systems "within" it, take snapshots, etc.?
Thanks,
Haik
Support for this should be available within the next month or two. You
should check out PSARC/2006/465
h
Richard Elling wrote:
CF cards aren't generally very fast, so the solid state disk vendors are
putting them into hard disk form factors with SAS/SATA interfaces.
Timing is everything... a new standard might help... let's call it "miCard"
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?ar
hi all,
i would like to ask some questions regarding best practices for zfs
recovery if disk errors occur.
currently i have zfs boot (nv62) and the following setup:
2 si3224 controllers (each 4 sata disks)
8 sata disks, same size, same type
i have two pools:
a) rootpool
b) datapool
the rootpoo
Support for this should be available within the next month or two. You
should check out PSARC/2006/465
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=47766
This is what I was looking for.
Thanks,
Haik
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
Hmm, I am having some problems, I did follow what you suggested and here is what
I did:
bash-3.00# zpool status
pool: mypool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
mypool ONLINE 0 0 0
mirrorONLINE
On May 31, 2007 1:59:04 PM -0700 Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
CF cards aren't generally very fast, so the solid state disk vendors are
putting them into hard disk form factors with SAS/SATA interfaces. These
If CF cards aren't fast, how will putting them into a different form
fact
On 5/31/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so I do run replace command and I get and error:
bash-3.00# zpool replace mypool c1t2d0 emcpower0a
cannot replace c1t2d0 with emcpower0a: device is too small
Try "zpool attach mypool emcpower0a"; see
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/6n7ht6qrt
Frank Cusack wrote:
On May 31, 2007 1:59:04 PM -0700 Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
CF cards aren't generally very fast, so the solid state disk vendors are
putting them into hard disk form factors with SAS/SATA interfaces. These
If CF cards aren't fast, how will putting them into
On 5/31/07, Jakob Praher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
c) si 3224 related question: is it possible to simply hot swap the disk
(i have the disks in special hot-swappable units, but have no experience
in hotswapping under solaris, such that i want to have some echo).
As it happens, I just happen to
Jakob Praher schrieb:
hi all,
i would like to ask some questions regarding best practices for zfs
recovery if disk errors occur.
currently i have zfs boot (nv62) and the following setup:
2 si3224 controllers (each 4 sata disks)
8 sata disks, same size, same type
i have two pools:
a) rootpool
hi Will,
thanks for your answer.
Will Murnane schrieb:
On 5/31/07, Jakob Praher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
c) si 3224 related question: is it possible to simply hot swap the disk
(i have the disks in special hot-swappable units, but have no experience
in hotswapping under solaris, such that i w
45 matches
Mail list logo
