Looking into this further, it looks like this be available in build 77, with
zfs snapshot -r a new zfs send -r feature:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=163689
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/574/
Flexible is right. I knew Unix / Linux traditionally make it possible to do a
lot from the command line, but having never used them I'd just assumed they
were basically very similar to windows, but with a whole load of extra overhead
because of all the commands you had to learn.
But after
I have a test cluster running HA-NFS that shares both ufs and zfs based file
systems. However, the behavior that I am seeing is a little perplexing.
The Setup: I have Sun Cluster 3.2 on a pair of SunBlade 1000's connecting to
two T3B partner groups through a QLogic switch. All four bricks of
Richard Elling wrote:
Morris Hooten wrote:
I looked through the solarsinternals zfs best practices and not
completly sure
of the best scenario.
ok, perhaps we should add some clarifications...
I have a Solaris 10 6/06 Generic_125100-10 box with attached 3510 array
and would like to
Mangan wrote:
Is this a release that can be downloaded from the website and will work on
SPARC systems. The write up says it is for VMware. Am I missing something?
Use Solaris 10 9/07. It has more than a year's worth of improvements
and enhancements to Solaris.
-- richard
Mangan wrote:
The 9/07 release appears to be for X86 only. The 8/07 release appears to be
for Sparc or X86. The 9/07 release is also titled Express Developers
Edition 9/07.
Apparently not a release I can use.
Thanks for the quick feedback.
ok my mistake, getting confused by release
Yes. No more fsck any-more, no more fsck any-more.. dudidelu... (the
stranglers)
What can early adaptors do to prepare their systems?
Where are the docs?
In the meantime, can I boot an UFS miniroot (from install DVD/CD) and then
switch the running system to zfs root without beeing limited to a
Kent Watsen wrote:
I've already ordered more cables for the aoc-sat2-mv8 and will report
which ones work when I get them
I've tried the following four cables:
1. CBL-SFF8087OCR-05M from http://store.3ware.com
http://store.3ware.com/status.cfm?confirmation=200712172508AMC821
2.
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Mangan wrote:
The 9/07 release appears to be for X86 only. The 8/07 release appears
to be for Sparc or X86. The 9/07 release is also titled Express
Developers Edition 9/07.
Apparently not a release I can use.
Thanks for the quick
Ross wrote:
Flexible is right. I knew Unix / Linux traditionally make it possible to do
a lot from the command line, but having never used them I'd just assumed they
were basically very similar to windows, but with a whole load of extra
overhead because of all the commands you had to
Matthew C Aycock wrote:
I have a test cluster running HA-NFS that shares both ufs and zfs based file
systems. However, the behavior that I am seeing is a little perplexing.
Since this is a purely synchronous test, suspect the ZIL.
Ross wrote:
It's so far taken about a day to work out ZFS, Samba (and SWAT), vi,
bash and SSH.
Try b78 - it's got the new native CIFS (SMB) server. And it's integrated
with zfs, so you can create a windows-accessible share as easily as:
zfs create -o sharesmb=name=sharename poolname/zfsname
i have a difficulty in understanding:
you tell that the device get`s lost whenver the I/O error occurs.
you tell that you cannot use ext3 or xfs, but reiser.
with reiser, the device doesn`t get lost on I/O error ?
that`s very weird.
what`s your distro/kernel version ?
This message posted
13 matches
Mail list logo
