Hi Max,
You might be hitting the BUG 6513209 (Contributer to the 'zpool import'
delay). There is going to be an official patch soon. Currently it is in
T-Patch state.
You should be able to get the T-Patch through your support channel.
--
Prabahar.
Max Holm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 3-node(
Hi,
I have a 3-node(SunFire V890) VCS cluster running Solaris 10 u4
with LUNs from some Sun 6130,6140 and IBM 8100 arrays. It has been
working well. But one of the nodes started to have troubles
in running ZFS commands this Tue, 2/19. Any ZFS command, e.g.,
'zpool import' can take hours to comple
> For home use I am making very successful use of zfs incremental send
> and receive. A script decides which filesystems to backup (based
> on a user property retrieved by zfs get) and snapshots the filesystem;
> it then looks for the last snapshot that the pool I'm backing
> up and the pool I'm b
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 11:06 -0800, John Tracy wrote:
> I've read that this behavior can be expected depending on how the LAG
> is setup, whether it divides hashes up the data on a per packet or per
> source/destination basis/or other options.
(this is a generic answer, not specific to zfs export
On 02/21/08 16:31, Rich Teer wrote:
What is the current preferred method for backing up ZFS data pools,
preferably using free ($0.00) software, and assuming that access to
individual files (a la ufsbackup/ufsrestore) is required?
For home use I am making very successful use of zfs incremental
I'm now getting about 90 megabytes of sustained IO from the Windows client to
an iSCSI target. I'm using HD Tach (http://www.simplisoftware.com) to measure
IO. Real world operations now are also averaging about 90 megabytes/second on
read and write speeds (large hunks of continuous IO, of course
Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the current preferred method for backing up ZFS data pools,
> preferably using free ($0.00) software, and assuming that access to
> individual files (a la ufsbackup/ufsrestore) is required?
If you like to still do incremental backups, I r
Hi all,
What is the current preferred method for backing up ZFS data pools,
preferably using free ($0.00) software, and assuming that access to
individual files (a la ufsbackup/ufsrestore) is required?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http:
> 1) If i create a raidz2 pool on some disks, start to use it, then the disks'
> controllers change. What will happen to my zpool? Will it be lost or is
> there some disk tagging which allows zfs to recognise the disks?
It'll be fine. ZFS opens by path, but then checks both the devid and
the on-d
On 21 February, 2008 - Justin Vassallo sent me these 10K bytes:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> 1) If i create a raidz2 pool on some disks, start to use it, then the disks'
> controllers change. What will happen to my zpool? Will it be lost or is
> there some disk tagging which allows zfs to recognise the di
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:58:55 +0100
Justin Vassallo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) If i create a raidz2 pool on some disks, start to use it, then the
> disks' controllers change. What will happen to my zpool? Will it be
> lost or is there some disk tagging which allows zfs to recognise the
> disks?
Hello,
1) If i create a raidz2 pool on some disks, start to use it, then the disks'
controllers change. What will happen to my zpool? Will it be lost or is
there some disk tagging which allows zfs to recognise the disks?
2) if i create a raidz2 on 3 HDs, do i have any resilience? If any one
Hey folks,
I'm currently testing ZFS mounted on a pair of iSCSI targets, and am having
problems if I disconnect either target to simulate a failure. The whole system
hangs for almost exactly 3 minutes whenever I do this, even though I'm running
a mirrored zpool and the other half of the mirror
13 matches
Mail list logo
