Can we take further discussion of star to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unless it really has something to do with ZFS.
Thanks.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
michael schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you believe that an incremental backup disallows to extract single
files
Rich never said so. He said the ability to do incremental backups and
restore arbitrary files from an archive are two different things. You were
addressing an issue
Joerg Schilling wrote:
michael schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you believe that an incremental backup disallows to extract single
files
Rich never said so. He said the ability to do incremental backups and
restore arbitrary files from an archive are two different things. You were
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we take further discussion of star to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unless it really has something to do with ZFS.
Do you have a problem with a backup related discussion related to ZFS?
The original question from the OP was ZFS related and it has not
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
michael schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you believe that an incremental backup disallows to extract single
files
Rich never said so. He said the ability to do incremental backups and
restore arbitrary files
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
michael schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you believe that an incremental backup disallows to extract single
files
Rich never said so. He said the ability to do incremental backups and
restore
On my S10U4:
# which gzip
/usr/bin/gzip
# grep /usr/bin/gzip /var/sadm/install/contents
/usr/bin/gzip f none 0555 root bin 52540 29391 1166457626 SUNWgzip
I don't really understand where your problem is ? :)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Sandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my S10U4:
# which gzip
/usr/bin/gzip
# grep /usr/bin/gzip /var/sadm/install/contents
/usr/bin/gzip f none 0555 root bin 52540 29391 1166457626 SUNWgzip
I don't really understand where your problem is ? :)
He wants
hi folks
I've been running my fileserver at home with linux for a couple of years and
last week I finally reinstalled it with solaris 10 u4.
I borrowed a bunch of disks from a friend, copied over all the files,
reinstalled my fileserver and copied the data back.
Everything went fine, but
Is it still the case that there is a kernel panic if the device(s) with the ZFS
pool die?
I was thinking to attach some cheap SATA disks to a system to use for nearline
storage. Then I could use ZFS send/recv on the local system (without ssh) to
keep backups of the stuff in the main pool.
We are having the same problem. We were told that patch 127728-06 should
fix our problem once it is released.
Is this the same T-patch you are talking about?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Prabahar Jeyaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Max,
You might be hitting the BUG 6513209
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 01:49, Jonathan Loran wrote:
In some circles, CDP is big business. It would be a great ZFS offering.
ZFS doesn't have it built-in, but AVS made be an option in some cases:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/
Point in time copy (as AVS offers) is
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 11:48 -0800, Vincent Fox wrote:
Is it still the case that there is a kernel panic if the device(s) with the
ZFS pool die?
I was thinking to attach some cheap SATA disks to a system to use for
nearline storage. Then I could use ZFS send/recv on the local system
Hello all,
I just did this post about the problem:
http://www.posix.brte.com.br/blog/?p=103
I just want to know if somebody knows the Linux implementation of XFS, EXT3,
or another filesystem to confirm that the ACK by the fileserver is without
log the transaction (like ZIL), or without commit
My guess is that you have some defective hardware in the system that's
causing bit flips in the checksum or the data payload.
I'd suggest running some sort of system diagnostics for a few hours to
see if you can locate the bad piece of hardware.
My suspicion would be your memory or CPU, but
And would drive storage requirements through the roof!!
I like it!
;)
Nathan.
Jonathan Loran wrote:
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 01:49, Jonathan Loran wrote:
In some circles, CDP is big business. It would be a great ZFS offering.
ZFS doesn't have it built-in, but AVS made be
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, msl wrote:
I mean, can you confirm that the zil_disable/zfs solaris nfs
service, is a similar service like a standard xfs or ext3 linux/nfs
solution (take into account the NFS service provided)?
From what I have heard:
* Linux does not implement NFS writes correctly
Jonathan Loran wrote:
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 01:49, Jonathan Loran wrote:
In some circles, CDP is big business. It would be a great ZFS offering.
ZFS doesn't have it built-in, but AVS made be an option in some cases:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/
[i]And would drive storage requirements through the roof!![/i]
The interesting part is, Nathan, you're probably wrong.
First, though, some of my contacts in the enterprise gladly spent millions for
third-party applications running on Microsoft to do exactly that.
[But we all know that SUN is
For Linux NFS service, it's a option in /etc/exports.
The default for modern (post-1.0.1) NFS utilities is sync, which means that
data and metadata will be written to the disk whenever NFS requires it
(generally upon an NFS COMMIT operation). This is the same as Solaris with
UFS, or with
How do you use CDP backups? How do you decide at which write(2) (or
dirty page write, or fsync(2), ...) to restore some file? What if the
app has many files? Point-in-time? Sure, but since you can't restore
all application state (unless you're checkpointing processes too) then
how can you be
Disk encryption easily defeated, research shows
http://www.itpro.co.uk/storage/news/170304/disk-encryption-easily-defeated-research-shows.html
Freezing RAM, whatever next?
Ian
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
