Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > michael schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> Why do you believe that an incremental backup disallows to extract single
> >>> files
> >> Rich never said so. He said "the ability to do incremental backups and
> >> restore arbitrary files from an archive are two different things." You
> >> were
> >> addressing an issue he never brought up.
> >
> > I would like to know why you and he believe so.
> >
> > I believe this is something that cannot be looked at independently.
> > Well, looking at e.g. Amanda shows that the Amanda people use an
> > incompatible
> > nomenclature. Amanda is e.g. doing time based backups but (as it prefers
> > GNU tar for backups) is unable to do a complete restore from scratch.
> >
> > Mybe you and Rich could describe what you are interested in as you seem to
> > have an unusual understanding of what might be of interest.
>
> PLEASE take this OFF the ZFS discussion alias this has nothing to do
> with ZFS any more.
I am sorry to see that you don't like a ZFS related discussion in this list.
Please just read what I what I have written in the mail you replied.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
