[zfs-discuss] want to intercept all IO on ZFS file sytem

2008-03-11 Thread shriram agarwal
hi , i want to intercept IO on ZFS at vnode layer, i changed vnodeops pointer for zfs in vfs frame work but i only get IO for creating new file but i dont get for read,lookup,write,changing setattribute etc. can somebody explain why ? and how can i achieve that? similar thing works fine for vxfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS partition info makes my system not boot

2008-03-11 Thread Frank Bottone
I checked for the bios updates - there are none (its just a consumer grade system). I will try disabling the drives in the bios - I did not realize that Solaris would still see the drives with that set. That would be the simplest method! If not, I will try to partition and give a full slice to ZFS

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS partition info makes my system not boot

2008-03-11 Thread Andy Lubel
On Mar 11, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Bart Smaalders wrote: > Frank Bottone wrote: >> I'm using the latest build of opensolaris express available from >> opensolaris.org. >> >> I had no problems with the install (its an AMD64 x2 3800+, 1gb >> physical ram, 1 ide drive for the os and 4*250GB sata drives at

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS partition info makes my system not boot

2008-03-11 Thread Bart Smaalders
Frank Bottone wrote: > I'm using the latest build of opensolaris express available from > opensolaris.org. > > I had no problems with the install (its an AMD64 x2 3800+, 1gb > physical ram, 1 ide drive for the os and 4*250GB sata drives attached > to the motherboard - nforce based chipset). > > I

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS partition info makes my system not boot

2008-03-11 Thread Richard Elling
Frank Bottone wrote: > I'm using the latest build of opensolaris express available from > opensolaris.org. > > I had no problems with the install (its an AMD64 x2 3800+, 1gb > physical ram, 1 ide drive for the os and 4*250GB sata drives attached > to the motherboard - nforce based chipset). > I

[zfs-discuss] ZFS partition info makes my system not boot

2008-03-11 Thread Frank Bottone
I'm using the latest build of opensolaris express available from opensolaris.org. I had no problems with the install (its an AMD64 x2 3800+, 1gb physical ram, 1 ide drive for the os and 4*250GB sata drives attached to the motherboard - nforce based chipset). I create a zfs pool on the 4 sata driv

Re: [zfs-discuss] Preserve creator across send/receive

2008-03-11 Thread Haik Aftandilian
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Haik Aftandilian wrote: > > Or is there a way to manually set the creator of a > fileystem? > > Not knowing any better I used a simple 'chown > owner:group' syntax. :-) I didn't think of that :) But, I just tried it (changing the ownership of the mountpoint) and it did not

Re: [zfs-discuss] Preserve creator across send/receive

2008-03-11 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Haik Aftandilian wrote: > Or is there a way to manually set the creator of a fileystem? Not knowing any better I used a simple 'chown owner:group' syntax. :-) You could also use 'cpio -p' to transfer directory ownership based on the original master. Bob

[zfs-discuss] Preserve creator across send/receive

2008-03-11 Thread Haik Aftandilian
I recently added a new disk to a workstation that just had one disk which was being used as the boot disk with a large partition being used as a zpool. I added a new disk to this system and created a new pool comprised of only the new disk in order to migrate all the data on the original zfs par

Re: [zfs-discuss] ACL invalid argument from client

2008-03-11 Thread Mark Shellenbaum
Kevin Kramer wrote: > client is CentOS 5.1 > server is running Sol10 > You should look into applying the patch I mentioned earlier on your S10 server. -Mark > > > > Is your ZFS file system on an S10 system? > > > > You are most likely seeing this bug. > > > > 6528189 cp -p invalid ar

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs boot, status anyone

2008-03-11 Thread Ivan Wang
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Ivan Wang wrote: > > > Hi Lori, > > > > Do you happen to know any update on Live Update zfs > support? > > You mean Live Upgrade? It's being worked on as we > speak to make it > zfs-aware. It should be available at the same time > the zfs-aware > installer is made avail

Re: [zfs-discuss] ACL invalid argument from client

2008-03-11 Thread Mark Shellenbaum
Kevin Kramer wrote: > no. I'm running on a Dell 1950. I'm updating the system now. Do my > aclmode,aclinherit look right? I've read the guide and think this is my > best option. > > thanks. the ACL properties have no bearing on this. The issue is that you are using an NFSv3 client and its ask

Re: [zfs-discuss] ACL invalid argument from client

2008-03-11 Thread Mark Shellenbaum
kevin kramer wrote: > client CentOS 5.1 latest kernel > mount option for zfs filesystem = > rw,nosuid,nodev,remount,noatime,nfsvers=3,udp,intr,bg > ,hard,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 > > directory and parent owned by user and users GID, 775 > on client t

[zfs-discuss] ACL invalid argument from client

2008-03-11 Thread kevin kramer
client CentOS 5.1 latest kernel mount option for zfs filesystem = rw,nosuid,nodev,remount,noatime,nfsvers=3,udp,intr,bg ,hard,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 directory and parent owned by user and users GID, 775 on client touch /tmp/dummy cd to zfs area mv

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs mount fails - directory not empty

2008-03-11 Thread Bob Netherton
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 15:19 +0800, Wee Yeh Tan wrote: > Bob, > > Are you sure that /pandora is mounted? Now that you ask, not sure. It shows as mounted but there is no data in there other than the mountpoints for the other children filesystems. > zpool:pandora when /pandora is not empty. I n

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs boot, status anyone

2008-03-11 Thread Mark J Musante
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Ivan Wang wrote: > Hi Lori, > > Do you happen to know any update on Live Update zfs support? You mean Live Upgrade? It's being worked on as we speak to make it zfs-aware. It should be available at the same time the zfs-aware installer is made available. Regards, markm _

Re: [zfs-discuss] X4500 device disconnect problem persists

2008-03-11 Thread Gerry Haskins
Do *NOT* install 127871-02 on a Solaris 10 system. 127871-02 is an immature Feature patch associated with Solaris 10 Update 5. It's only purpose is for constructing pre-release "builds" of Solaris 10 Update 5 for internal Sun testing. It is *not* to be installed on pre-U5 systems. 127871-02 c