Srinivas Chadalavada wrote:
I see the first disk as unavailble, How do i make it online?
By replacing it with a non-broken one.
--
Ralf Ramge
Senior Solaris Administrator, SCNA, SCSA
Tel. +49-721-91374-3963
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://web.de/
11 Internet AG
Brauerstraße 48
76135 Karlsruhe
For a root device it doesn't matter that much. You're not going to be
writing to the device at a high data rate so write/erase cycles don't
factor much (MLC can sustain about a factor of 10 more). With MLC
you'll get 2-4x the capacity for the same price, but again that
doesn't matter much
Hi,
I've searched without luck, so I'm asking instead.
I have a Solaris 10 box,
# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC
Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Hey folks,
Is anybody able to help a Solaris scripting newbie with this? I want to put
together an automatic script to take snapshots on one system and send them
across to another. I've shown the manual process works, but only have a very
basic idea about how I'm going to automate this.
My
Hi
Clive King has a nice blog entry showing this in action
http://blogs.sun.com/clive/entry/replication_using_zfs
with associated script at:
http://blogs.sun.com/clive/resource/zfs_repl.ksh
Which I think answers most of your questions.
Enda
Ross wrote:
Hey folks,
Is anybody able to help a
Hi again... today I maybe had the same problem you described...
I had an on disk format of 11. After upgrading to 13 all works fine.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Mikael Kjerrman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've searched without luck, so I'm asking instead.
I have a Solaris 10 box,
# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC
Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All
define a lot :-)
We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot but perhaps it
is enough to screw up the estimates? Anyhow the resilvering completed about
4386h earlier than expected so everything is ok now, but I still feel that the
way it figures out the number is wrong.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the progress so far 0.04%. In my experience the time estimate has
no basis in reality until it's about 1% do or so. I think there is some
bookkeeping or something ZFS does at the start of a scrub or resilver that
throws off the
Well, I just got in a system I am intending to be a BIG fileserver;
background- I work for a SAN startup, and we're expecting in our first year to
collect 30-60 terabytes of Fibre Channel traces. The purpose of this is to be
a large repository for those traces w/ statistical analysis run
sc == Srinivas Chadalavada [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rr == Ralf Ramge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sc I see the first disk as unavailble, How do i make it online?
rr By replacing it with a non-broken one.
Ralf, aren't you missing this obstinence-error:
sc the following errors must
Mikael Kjerrman wrote:
define a lot :-)
We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot but perhaps
it is enough to screw up the estimates? Anyhow the resilvering completed
about 4386h earlier than expected so everything is ok now, but I still feel
that the way it figures
t == Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
t http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USASLP-L8i.cfm
I'm not sure. A different thing is wrong with it depending on what
driver attaches to it. I can't tell for sure because this page:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Hardware/sas.html
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Ross Becker wrote:
I configured up an 11 drive RAID6 set + 1 hot spare on the Areca
controller put a ZFS on that raid volume, and ran bonnie++ against
it (16g size), and achieved 150 mb/s write, 200 mb/s read. I then
blew that away, configured the Areca to present
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 18:51, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what's wrong with this card?
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USASLP-L8i.cfm
If you have a UIO slot (many recent Supermicro boards do) then it's a
fine choice. But if you have a non-Supermicro board, you may
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 21:59, Miles Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wm == Will Murnane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wm I'd rather have a working closed blob than a driver that is
wm Free Software for a device that is faulty. Ideals are very
wm nice, but broken hardware isn't.
I am running OpenSolaris 2008.05 as a PV guest under Xen. If you import the
bootable root pool of a VM into another Solaris VM, the root pool is no longer
bootable.
It is related to the device associated to the pool, which is originally c4d0s0,
but on import (-f) becomes c0d2s0 in this case.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Will Murnane [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 18:51, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what's wrong with this card?
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USASLP-L8i.cfm
If you have a UIO slot (many recent Supermicro boards do)
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Miles Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t == Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
t
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USASLP-L8i.cfm
I'm not sure. A different thing is wrong with it depending on what
driver attaches to it. I can't
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 21:51, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a UIO card. It's a standard PCI-E card. What the description
is telling you is that you can combine it with a UIO card to add raid
functionality as there is none built-in.
Not so. The description [1] mentions that this
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Will Murnane [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 21:51, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a UIO card. It's a standard PCI-E card. What the
description
is telling you is that you can combine it with a UIO card to add raid
functionality
Okay, after doing some testing, it appears that the issue is on the ZFS side.
I fiddled around a while with options on the areca card, and never got any
better performance results than my first test. So, my best out of the raidz2 is
42 mb/s write and 43 mb/s read. I also tried turning off
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Ross Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Okay, after doing some testing, it appears that the issue is on the ZFS
side. I fiddled around a while with options on the areca card, and never
got any better performance results than my first test. So, my best out of
the
Tim wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Miles Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t == Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
t
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USASLP-L8i.cfm
I'm not sure. A different
Ross Becker wrote:
Well, I just got in a system I am intending to be a BIG fileserver;
background- I work for a SAN startup, and we're expecting in our first
year to collect 30-60 terabytes of Fibre Channel traces. The purpose of
this is to be a large repository for those traces w/
Ross Becker wrote:
Okay, after doing some testing, it appears that the issue is on the ZFS side.
I fiddled around a while with options on the areca card, and never got any
better performance results than my first test. So, my best out of the raidz2
is 42 mb/s write and 43 mb/s read. I
26 matches
Mail list logo
