On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Mikael Kjerrman wrote:
define a lot :-)
We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot but
perhaps it is enough to screw up the estimates? Anyhow the resilvering
completed about 4386h earlier than
Hi
Please see the query below. Appreciate any help.
Rgds
jonathan
Original Message
Would you mind helping me ask your tech guy whether there will be
repercussions when I try to run this command in view of the situation below:
# /*zpool add -f zhome raidz
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:30 PM, jonathan sai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you mind helping me ask your tech guy whether there will be
repercussions when I try to run this command in view of the situation below:
# *zpool add -f zhome raidz c6t6006016056AC1A00C8FB7A6346F8DB11d0
After successful upgrade from snv_95 to snv_98 ( ufs boot - zfs boot).
After luactive new BE with zfs. I am not able to ludelete old BE with ufs.
problem is, I think that zfs boot is /rpool/boot/grub.
ludelete snv_b95
System has findroot enabled GRUB
Checking if last BE on any disk...
BE snv_b95
Hi,
I'm about to convert my 3 * 1 TB raidz to a 5 * 1 TB raidz. Since raidz
can't be grown like that I have to find some place to move the data to
temporarily while I reformat the raidz. However, I'm short on disk
space (which is why I'm adding 2 new disks).
So, is it possible to create a 5 * 1
Mikael Kjerrman wrote:
I also have a question about sharing a zfs from the global zone to a local
zone. Are there any issues with this? We had an unfortunate sysadmin who did
this and our systems hung. We have no logs that show anyhing at all, but I
thought I'd ask just be sure.
How
We have a moderately sized Cyrus installation with 2 TB of storage
and a few thousand simultaneous IMAP sessions. When one of the
backup processes is running during the day, there's a noticable
slowdown in IMAP client performance. When I start my `mutt' mail
reader, it pauses for several seconds
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Sundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, is it possible to create a 5 * 1 TB raidz with 4 disks (i.e., with
one disk offline)? In that case I could use one of the 1 TB disks as
The official answer is no, but it might be possible to fool Solaris
into letting
