On Feb 14, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Nicholas Lee wrote:
A useful article about long term use of the Intel SSD X25-M: http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=669
- Long-term performance analysis of Intel Mainstream SSDs.
Would a zfs cache (ZIL or ARC) based on a SSD device see this kind
of issue? Ma
Hello Bob,
Sunday, February 15, 2009, 9:42:25 PM, you wrote:
BF> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Colin Raven wrote:
>>>
>>> As a followup; is there any ongoing sensible way to defend against the
dreaded fragmentation? A [shudder] "defrag" routine of some kind perhaps?
Forgive the "silly questions
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Sanjeev wrote:
> Sriram,
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:12:42AM +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Sanjeev
> wrote:
> > > Sendai,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:21:25PM -0800, Andras Spitzer wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >
> "t" == Tim writes:
t> Uhhh, S10 box that provide zfs backed iSCSI is NOT fine. Cite
t> the plethora of examples on this list of how the fault
t> management stack takes so long to respond it's basically
t> unusable as it stands today.
well...if we are talking about rel
Thanks for the info Dave, I filed a bug on this: 6805659.
Regards
Henrik
On Feb 13, 2009, at 1:30 AM, Dave wrote:
Henrik Johansson wrote:
I tried to export the zpool also, and I got this, the strange part
is that it sometimes still thinks that the ubuntu-01-dsk01 dataset
exists:
# zpool
known issue? I've seen this 5 times over the past few days. I think
these were, for the most part BFUs on top of B107. x86.
# pstack fmd.733
core 'fmd.733' of 733:/usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmd
- lwp# 1 / thread# 1
fe8c3347 libzfs_fini (0, fed9e000, 8047d08, fed749
Hi all,
Ok, this might be to stir some things up again but I would like to
make this more clear.
I have been reading this and other threads regarding ZFS on SAN and
how well ZFS can recover from a serious error such as a cached disk
array goes down or the connection to the SAN is lost. Wh
Hi,
James Litchfield wrote:
known issue? I've seen this 5 times over the past few days. I think
these were, for the most part BFUs on top of B107. x86.
Yes, Dan Price reported this happening post the fix to 6802281.
Not sure there is a CR number as yet; Steve has a proposed
fix which you coul
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Henrik Johansson wrote:
We are currently evaluating if we should begin to implement ZFS in our SAN. I
can see great opportunities with ZFS but if we have a higher risk of loosing
entire pools that is a serious issue. I am aware that the other filesystems
might not be in a
On February 15, 2009 11:02:51 PM -0600 David Dyer-Bennet
wrote:
So I did this:
zfs send -R "rpool/export/h...@bup-20090216-044512utc" | zfs receive\
-dv "bup-ruin/fsfs"
And it indicated no errors, and said it was creating various expected
filesystems (pool bup-ruin was br
On February 1, 2009 8:30:21 AM -0800 Frank Cusack
wrote:
nevermind, i will just get a Promise array.
Don't. I don't normally like to badmouth vendors, but my experience
with Promise was one of the worst in my career, for reasons that should
be relevant other ZFS-oriented customers.
recommen
Turns out setting altroot is the way to do this.
Thanks to David Dyer-Bennet for the solution, given in another thread.
-frank
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, February 16, 2009 21:31, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On February 15, 2009 11:02:51 PM -0600 David Dyer-Bennet
> wrote:
>> So I did this:
>>
>> zfs send -R "rpool/export/h...@bup-20090216-044512utc" | zfs receive\
>> -dv "bup-ruin/fsfs"
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:12, Tim wrote:
> I wouldn't think grabbing 8GB memory would be a big deal after dropping that
> much on the controller??
There being no sense in half measures, I ordered 12GB (i.e., three
kits) of this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148115
Unfor
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us said:
> A 12-disk pool that I built a year ago is still working fine with absolutely
> no problems at all. Another two disk pool built using cheap large USB
> drives has been running for maybe eight months, with no problems.
We have non-redundant ZFS pools on an H
15 matches
Mail list logo
