[zfs-discuss] zfs + charset

2011-01-15 Thread Achim Wolpers
Hi! I have a problem with the charset in the following scenario: - OSOL Server with zfs pool und NFS/CIFS shares enabled - OSX Client with CIFS mounts - OSX Client with NFSv3 mounts If one of the clients saves a file with a special character in the filename like 'äüöß', the other client can not

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs + charset

2011-01-15 Thread Chris Ridd
On 15 Jan 2011, at 13:44, Achim Wolpers wrote: Hi! I have a problem with the charset in the following scenario: - OSOL Server with zfs pool und NFS/CIFS shares enabled - OSX Client with CIFS mounts - OSX Client with NFSv3 mounts If one of the clients saves a file with a special

Re: [zfs-discuss] (Fletcher+Verification) versus (Sha256+No Verification)

2011-01-15 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:32:58AM -0800, Peter Taps wrote: Ed, Thank you for sharing the calculations. In lay terms, for Sha256, how many blocks of data would be needed to have one collision? Assuming each block is 4K is size, we probably can calculate the final data size beyond which

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs + charset

2011-01-15 Thread Achim Wolpers
Am 15.01.11 14:52, schrieb Chris Ridd: What are the normalization properties of these filesystems? The zfs man page says they're used when comparing filenames: The normalization properties are set to none. Is this the key to my solution? Achim signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs + charset

2011-01-15 Thread Chris Ridd
On 15 Jan 2011, at 13:57, Achim Wolpers wrote: Am 15.01.11 14:52, schrieb Chris Ridd: What are the normalization properties of these filesystems? The zfs man page says they're used when comparing filenames: The normalization properties are set to none. Is this the key to my solution?

Re: [zfs-discuss] (Fletcher+Verification) versus (Sha256+No Verification)

2011-01-15 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Taps Thank you for sharing the calculations. In lay terms, for Sha256, how many blocks of data would be needed to have one collision? There is no point in making a generalization and a

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool scalability and performance

2011-01-15 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
the ZFS_Best_Practises_Guide states this: Keep vdevs belonging to one zpool of similar sizes; Otherwise, as the pool fills up, new allocations will be forced to favor larger vdevs over smaller ones and this will cause subsequent reads to come from a subset of underlying devices leading to

Re: [zfs-discuss] (Fletcher+Verification) versus (Sha256+No Verification)

2011-01-15 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Peter Taps wrote: Thank you for sharing the calculations. In lay terms, for Sha256, how many blocks of data would be needed to have one collision? Two. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick

Re: [zfs-discuss] HP ProLiant N36L

2011-01-15 Thread Jan Sommer
I could resolve this issue: I was testing FreeNAS with a raidz1 setup before I decided to check out Nexentastore and it seems Nexentastore has some kind of problems if the harddisk array already contain some kind of raidz data. After wiping the discs with a tool from the Ultimate Boot CD I

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs + charset

2011-01-15 Thread Brandon High
The different methods should be chosen based on the types of clients you expect. Mac and Linux work better with one, and windows works best with another. Searching for formkc, etc. should yield some information on which is best for your purposes. -B Sent from my Nexus One. On Jan 15, 2011 6:17