On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
> Could you try to just boot up fbsd or linux on the box to see if zfs (native
> or fuse-based, respecively) can see the drives?
Yup, that might seem to be the best idea.
Assuming that all those drives are the original drives with ra
Nevermind this, I destroyed the raid volume, then checked each hard drive one
by one, and when I put it back together, the problem fixed itself. I'm now
getting 30-60MB/s read and write, which is still slow as heck, but works well
for my application.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Good morning all.
I built a test system using Linux (Ubuntu) and ZFS Fuse, just for testing...
I formatted 2 drives in the pool as ZFS, and have been putting data on the
system to see how performance worked, etc... Is this pool compatible with
ZFS proper? Eg, Solaris Express? Open Indiana?, or Nex
never mind... found an answer here:
http://groups.google.com/a/zfsonlinux.org/group/zfs-discuss/browse_thread/thread/3183dab146d5f1af/d9e9d59b19aa4401?lnk=raot
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Tiernan OToole wrote:
> Good morning all.
>
> I built a test system using Linux (Ubuntu) and ZFS Fuse,
Hello,
The bad news is I lost a drive on my production server. The good news is the
spare kicked in and everything kept running as it should. I stopped by the
datacenter last night, shut down the server, and physically replaced the failed
drive. I want to make sure I don't screw anything up so
Hi Chris,
Which Solaris release is this?
Depending on the Solaris release, you have a couple of
different options.
Here's one:
1. Physically replace original failed disk and detach
the spare.
A. If c10t0d0 was the disk that you physically replaced,
issue this command:
# zpool replace tank c
Cindy,
Thank you for the reply. I am running Solaris Express 11 (5.11 snv_151a i86pc
i386 i86pc Solaris).
I have physically replaced the drive, but I have not partitioned it yet. I know
there is a command to copy the layout from one disk to another and that has
worked well for me in the pa
Chris,
You don't need to partition the drive because your pool
contains whole disks.
The zpool replace command will do any relabeling that is
needed.
Do the replace first and then detach the spare, if needed.
The spare should detach automatically but sometimes it
doesn't.
Thanks,
Cindy
On 0
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC
wrote:
> I have physically replaced the drive, but I have not partitioned it yet. I
> know there is a command to copy the layout from one disk to another and that
> has worked well for me in the past. I just have to find the command ag
It's resilvering now - thanks for the help!
- Original Message -
From: "Cindy Swearingen"
To: "Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC"
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 4:26:00 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Replacing failed drive
Chris,
You don't need to part
On 22 Jul 2011, at 21:29, Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC wrote:
> It's resilvering now - thanks for the help!
I think the command you were trying to recall was prtvtoc.
Chris
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensol
In my new oracle server, sol11exp, it's using multipath device names...
Presently I have two disks attached: (I removed the other 10 disks for now,
because these device names are so confusing. This way I can focus on *just*
the OS disks.)
0. c0t5000C5003424396Bd0
/scsi_vhci
On 07/23/11 08:50 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
In my new oracle server, sol11exp, it's using multipath device
names... Presently I have two disks attached: (I removed the other
10 disks for now, because these device names are so confusing. This
way I can focus on **just** the OS disks.)
+1 on the below, and in addition...
...compact flash, like off of USB sticks is not designed to deal with very many
writes to it. Commonly it is used to store a bootable image that maybe once a
year will have an upgrade on it.
Basically, trying to use those devices for a ZIL, even they are mir
14 matches
Mail list logo
