Original Message-
From: Frank Van Damme
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 6:25 AM
>Op 20-05-11 01:17, Chris Forgeron schreef:
>> I ended up switching back to FreeBSD after using Solaris for some time
>> because I was getting tired of weird pool corruptions and the like.
>
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
>[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kraus
>
>Over the past few months I have seen mention of FreeBSD a couple time in
> regards to ZFS. My question is how stable (reliable) is ZFS on this platf
>On May 9, 2010 at 5:29PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>>On May 9, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
>>[..]
>> Q1 - Doesn't this behavior mean that the L2ARC can never get data objects if
>> the ARC doesn't hold them?
>
>Yes.
>
>> Is setting pr
Hello,
I'm on FreeBSD 9 with ZFS v28, and it's possible this combination is causing
my issue, but I thought I'd start here first and will cross-post to the FreeBSD
ZFS threads if the Solaris crowd thinks this is a FreeBSD problem.
The issue: From carefully watching my ARC/L2ARC size and acti
I've got a system with 24 Gig of RAM, and I'm running into some interesting
issues playing with the ARC, L2ARC, and the DDT. I'll post a separate thread
here shortly. I think even if you add more RAM, you'll run into what I'm
noticing (and posting about).
-Original Message-
From: zfs-d
I see your point, but you also have to understand that sometimes too many
helpers/opinions are a bad thing. There is a set "core" of ZFS developers who
make a lot of this move forward, and they are the key right now. The rest of us
will just muddy the waters with conflicting/divergent opinions
Ah, that's all I really need to know. I expected it to be public, but I
completely understand the need to keep it private so it can move forward
properly. This should hopefully provide enough record for other ZFS
well-wishers who are searching for signs of post-Oracle development.
-Origin
I'm curious where ZFS development is going.
I've been reading through the lists, and watching Oracle, Nexenta, Illumos, and
OpenIndiana for signs of life.
The feeling I get is that while there is plenty of userland work being done,
there is next to nothing on ZFS development outside of the Orac
Are you running CIFS with any AD integration, or is it functioning in
work-group mode?
Do you have lockups only when you transfer a lot of data, or will it lock up
without any machine working on the CIFS share?
How long is "time to time"?
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@op
ls
goes down.
Many thanks to George and his continued efforts.
From: haak...@gmail.com [mailto:haak...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark Alkema
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:38 PM
To: Chris Forgeron
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Repairing Faulted ZFS pool when zbd doesn't
recognize the pool
Quick update;
George has been very helpful, and there is progress with my zpool. I've got
partial read ability at this point, and some data is being copied off.
It was _way_ beyond my skillset to do anything.
Once we have things resolved to a better level, I'll post more details (with a
lot of
11 matches
Mail list logo
