such as images, mp3s, most video formats, etc.
That is akin to zipping a .zip file, and will only waste cpu and
memory, considering the compression in those formats will at least be
on par with LZH if not better.
--
Eric Enright
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
on Solaris, and have only ever used the
SiiG 3114. From what I've read here YMMV...
Quick answer though is to download CD1 of the latest release, boot to
a shell, and take a look.
--
Eric Enright
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
readable. Then to give the kids
access (who are not in group media) let that area be world readable.
I don't think you'd need real ACLs until you start adding another
level of complexity or two..
What method do you plan to use to provide network access? NFS? Samba?
--
Eric Enright
via NFS
and exporting /that/ with Samba, which seemed to work fine as far as
getting/setting ACLs via Explorer. That is clearly not an optimal
solution, however, and I decided that I could live with the real
permissions being invisible.
--
Eric Enright
/sadm/install/contents:
/usr/include/libzfs.h [...] SUNWhea
/usr/include/sys/fs/zfs.h [...] SUNWhea
--
Eric Enright
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
is being
worked on though, apparently, so I can wait:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-January/051123.html
--
Eric Enright
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
On 1/26/07, Robert Thurlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Enright wrote:
Samba does not currently support ZFS ACLs.
Yes, but this just means you can't get/set your ACLs from a CIFS
client. ACLs will be enforced just fine once set locally on the
server; you may also be able to get/set them
:)
Does my plan sound feasible from both a usability and performance standpoint?
Yes, however 60GB for root/swap is probably overkill. My notebook's setup:
s0: 10GB - root
s1: 2GB - swap
s3: 10GB - root
s4: the rest - ZFS
(I use s0 and s3 for Live Upgrade)
--
Eric Enright
Hi all,
I'm currently investigating solutions for disaster recovery, and would
like to go with a zfs-based solution. From what I understand, there
are two possible methods of achieving this: an iscsi mirror over a WAN
link, and remote replication with incremental zfs send/recv. Due to
, but I'm open to anonymous comments ;-) .
If you want some anonymous comments, you can go here :)
http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/18/1155226from=rss
--
Eric Enright
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
) on the filesystem
level. That is, if you write a ~66MB file, in actuality you use
~100MB of pool space. Modest tests I did just now with a new raidz
pool support this.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
--
Eric Enright
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
