Hi Richard,
Thanks for the detailed reply, and the work behind the scenes filing the CRs.
I've bookmarked both, and will keep a keen eye on them for status changes.
As Miles put it, I'll have to put these dumps into storage for possible future
use.
I do dearly hope that I'll be able to recover m
Thanks for the information, I'm learning quite a lot from all this.
It seems to me that zfs send *should* be doing some kind of verification, since
some work has clearly been put into zfs so that zfs's can be dumped into
files/pipes. It's a great feature to have, and I can't believe that this wa
Hi Mattias & Miles.
To test the version mismatch theory, I setup a snv_91 VM (using virtualbox) on
my snv_95 desktop, and tried the zfs receive again. Unfortunately the symptoms
are exactly the same: around the ~20GB mark, the justhome.zfs stream still
bombs out with the checksum error.
I didn
Hi folks,
Perhaps I was a little verbose in my first post, putting a view people off.
Does anyone else have any ideas on this one.
I can't be the first person to have had a problem with a zfs backup stream. Is
there nothing that can be done to recover at least some of the stream.
As another hel
Hi Folks,
I'm in the very unsettling position of fearing that I've lost all of my data
via a zfs send/receive operation, despite ZFS's legendary integrity.
The error that I'm getting on restore is:
receiving full stream of faith/[EMAIL PROTECTED] into Z/faith/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot receive: in
> On 7/17/06, Jonathan Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Reads: 4 disks gives me 190MB/sec. WOAH! I'm very
> happy with that. 8 disks should scale to 380 then,
> Well 320 isn't all that far off - no biggie.
> > Looking at the 6 disk raidz is in
ur performance
> expectations is that
> ZFS is-what-it-is at the moment.
Along those lines, I'll upgrade to the lastest nevada as soon as my
connection finishes it. 5 CDs is very non-trivial down in this part of
the world sadly.
> Regards,
>
> Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX.
Thanks for the reply Al,
Jonathan Wheeler
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Richard Elling wrote:
> Dana H. Myers wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Wheeler wrote:
>>
>>> On the one hand, that's greater then 1 disk's worth, so I'm getting
>>> striping performance out of a mirror GO ZFS. On the other, if I can get
>>> s
can read at 60-70Mb/sec. Why am I
not getting 65*8 (500MB/sec+) performance. Maybe it's the marvell driver at
fault here?
My thinking is that I need to get raid0 performing as expected before looking
at raidz, but I'm afraid I really don't know where to begin.
All thought
