Oops, sorry, right, 9 months... ;-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alan Coopersmith
Cc: jacob.rito...@gmail.com, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org,
indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org, t...@cook.ms
Gesendet: 22.2.'10, 22:03
Matthias Pfützner wrote:
(change in control) and the cycle o
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jacob Ritorto
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org
Gesendet: 22.2.'10, 21:46
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Justin Lee Ewing
wrote:
I'm not sure how there is mistreatment when known that Solaris 10 is the
current productio
/2/22 Matthias Pfützner :
> You (Jacob Ritorto) wrote:
>> FWIW, I suspect that this situation does not warrant a "Wait and See"
>> response. We're being badly mistreated here and it's probably too
>> late to do anything about it. Probably the only chance to qu
mply don't have any insight into
these things, I'm just concluding like you! And: The fact, that there still is
opensolaris.org does send a message!
BTW3: Do NOT expect ANY official statement from Oracle here, that simply will
not happen! (my sincere gut feeling!)
So, talk to your
Might be related to Solaris bug 6881590
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6881590-1
Matthias
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/
