Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Orvar Korvar
The problem is more clearly stated here. Look, 700GB is gone (the correct number is 620GB)! First I do zfs list onto TempStorage/Backup which reports 800GB. This is correct. Then I do df -h which reports only 180GB, which is not correct. So, it should be 800GB of data, but df reports only

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote: The problem is more clearly stated here. Look, 700GB is gone (the correct number is 620GB)! Somehow you remind me of the story the boy who cried wolf (Look, look! The wolf ate my disk space) :P First I do zfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha w...@fajar.net wrote: - Used, as reported by df, will match Used, as reported by zfs list. Sorry, it should be Used, as reported by df, will match Refer, as reported by zfs list. -- Fajar ___

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT TempStorage 916G 45,1G 37,3G /mnt/TempStorage TempStorage/Backup 799G 45,1G 177G /mnt/TempStorage/Backup OBS! 800GB! You probably have snapshots eating the remaining 620GB... Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47)

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Orvar Korvar
PS. I do not have any snapshots: root@frasse:~# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT TempStorage916G 45,1G 37,3G /mnt/TempStorage TempStorage/Backup 799G 45,1G 177G

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Chris Ridd
On 4 Jul 2011, at 12:58, Orvar Korvar wrote: PS. I do not have any snapshots: root@frasse:~# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT TempStorage916G 45,1G 37,3G /mnt/TempStorage TempStorage/Backup

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
try 'zfs list -t all' roy - Original Message - PS. I do not have any snapshots: root@frasse:~# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT TempStorage 916G 45,1G 37,3G /mnt/TempStorage TempStorage/Backup 799G 45,1G 177G /mnt/TempStorage/Backup TempStorage/EmmasFolder 78,6G 45,1G

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Jim Klimov
2011-07-04 15:04, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk пишет: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT TempStorage 916G 45,1G 37,3G /mnt/TempStorage TempStorage/Backup 799G 45,1G 177G /mnt/TempStorage/Backup OBS! 800GB! You probably have snapshots eating the remaining 620GB... I thought so too - df can lie a

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Jim Klimov
2011-07-04 15:58, Orvar Korvar пишет: PS. I do not have any snapshots: Depending on OS version and/or pool settings, they may not be shown by default as to not clobber the output. Try a direct request with zfs list -t snapshot or -t all, or list the .zfs/snapshot directory under the

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs!

2011-07-04 Thread Kalle Anka
: Mon, July 4, 2011 3:02:24 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? zfs list and df differs! try 'zfs list -t all' roy - Original Message - PS. I do not have any snapshots: root@frasse:~# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT TempStorage 916G 45,1G 37,3G /mnt/TempStorage