On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Orvar Korvar <
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Are there any drawbacks to partition a SSD in two parts and use L2ARC on
> one partition, and ZIL on the other? Any thoughts?
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>
On 07/22/10 04:00, Orvar Korvar wrote:
Ok, so the bandwidth will be cut in half, and some people use this
configuration. But, how bad is it to have the bandwidth cut in half?
Will it hardly notice?
For a home server, I doubt you'll notice.
I've set up several systems (desktop & home server) as
- Original Message -
> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 09:42 -0700, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> > Are there any drawbacks to partition a SSD in two parts and use
> > L2ARC on one partition, and ZIL on the other? Any thoughts?
>
> Its probably a reasonable approach. The ZIL can be fairly small...
> only
>
Ok, so the bandwidth will be cut in half, and some people use this
configuration. But, how bad is it to have the bandwidth cut in half? Will it
hardly notice?
(Just ordinary home server, some media files, ebooks, etc)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 09:42 -0700, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> Are there any drawbacks to partition a SSD in two parts and use L2ARC on one
> partition, and ZIL on the other? Any thoughts?
Its probably a reasonable approach. The ZIL can be fairly small... only
about 8 GB is probably sufficient for mo
Are there any drawbacks to partition a SSD in two parts and use L2ARC on one
partition, and ZIL on the other? Any thoughts?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/
