On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:36:22PM -0800, Brandon High wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be
to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
server where ZFS also
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:59:01AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be
to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage
management
On 2/20/2009 9:33 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:59:01AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be
to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
server where ZFS also runs
Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be
to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage
management would take place on the file server, where the physical
disks reside. The application
Gary Mills wrote:
Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be
to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage
management would take place on the file server, where the physical
disks reside.
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
gm server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All
gm storage management would take place on the file server, where
gm the physical disks reside. The application
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
gm server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All
gm storage management would take place on the file server, where
gm the physical disks reside. The application
j == jkait jkait...@gmail.com writes:
j [b] The Lustre team, I believe, is looking at porting the DMU
j **not** the entire zfs stack.
wow. That's even more awesome. In that case, since they are more or
less making their own filesystem, maybe it will be natural to validate
checksums
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be
to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage
management would take
