Thanks Adam,
So, if i understand well, the MLC SSD more appropriate for read cache is more
theory than pratice right now. Right? I mean, SUN is just using SLC SSD's?
That would explain the only support for SLC on SUN hardware (x42xx) series.
Thanks again.
Leal
[ http://www.eall.com.br/blog
My question is about SSD, and the differences between use SLC for
readzillas instead of MLC.
Sun uses MLCs for Readzillas for their 7000 series. I would think
that if SLCs (which are generally more expensive) were really
needed, they would be used.
That's not entirely accurate. In the
On Tue, August 11, 2009 09:24, Marcelo Leal wrote:
Many companies (including SUN), has just hardware with support to SLC...
as i need both, i just want to hear your experiences about use SLC SSD
for ZFS cache. One point is cost, but i want to know if the performance
is much different,
On Aug 11, 2009, at 17:07, Marcelo Leal wrote:
My question is about SSD, and the differences between use SLC for
readzillas instead of MLC.
Sun uses MLCs for Readzillas for their 7000 series. I would think that
if SLCs (which are generally more expensive) were really needed, they
would
