Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-19 Thread Adam Leventhal
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:09:07AM -0800, Andre Lue wrote: > Is the web interface on the appliance available for download or will it make > it to opensolaris sometime in the near future? It's not, and it's unlikely to make it to OpenSolaris. Adam -- Adam Leventhal, Fishworks

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-19 Thread Andre Lue
Refering to the web gui or bui seen here http://blogs.sun.com/brendan/entry/status_dashboard -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-18 Thread Andre Lue
Is the web interface on the appliance available for download or will it make it to opensolaris sometime in the near future? thanks -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensola

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Daryl Doami
when, but they're not that far off. Here's a list of what existing products we're currently targeting in the near term: http://www.sun.com/storage/flash/products.jsp Original Message ---- Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000 From: Adam Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Adam Leventhal
> Would be interesting to hear more about how Fishworks differs from > Opensolaris, what build it is based on, what package mechanism you are > using (IPS already?), and other differences... I'm sure these details will be examined in the coming weeks on the blogs of members of the Fishworks team

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Mika Borner
Adam Leventhal wrote: > Yes. The Sun Storage 7000 Series uses the same ZFS that's in OpenSolaris > today. A pool created on the appliance could potentially be imported on an > OpenSolaris system; that is, of course, not explicitly supported in the > service contract. > Would be interesting to he

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Tim
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:38:29PM -0600, Tim wrote: > > > > And this passage: > > "If there is a broken or missing disk, we don't let you proceed without > > explicit confirmation. The reason we do this is that once the st

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Eric Schrock
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:38:29PM -0600, Tim wrote: > > And this passage: > "If there is a broken or missing disk, we don't let you proceed without > explicit confirmation. The reason we do this is that once the storage pool > is configured, there is no way to add those disks to the pool without >

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Tim
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, we support adding whole or half JBODs. We do not support adding > individual disks or arbitrarily populated JBODs. If you want the > ability to survive JBOD failure ("NSPF" in our storage config terms), > you mus

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Eric Schrock
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:07:12PM -0600, Tim wrote: > > So that leads me to my second question then: If I buy a 7410 with a single > JBOD attached, can I easily attach a second JBOD and grow the pool? It > would seem the logical answer is "yes", since growing the pool would just > require addin

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Casper . Dik
>I'm not sure if this is the right place for the question or not, but I'll >throw it out there anyways. Does anyone know, if you create your pool(s) >with a system running fishworks, can that pool later be imported by a >standard solaris system? IE: If for some reason the head running fishworks

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Tim
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, the on-disk format is compatible. You cannot, however, do the > reverse. Importing arbitrary Solaris pools (or former Fishworks pools) > into the Fishworks environment is not supported. While the on-disk > format i

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Eric Schrock
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:35:38PM -0600, Tim wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the right place for the question or not, but I'll > throw it out there anyways. Does anyone know, if you create your pool(s) > with a system running fishworks, can that pool later be imported by a > standard solaris sys

Re: [zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Adam Leventhal
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:35:38PM -0600, Tim wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the right place for the question or not, but I'll > throw it out there anyways. Does anyone know, if you create your pool(s) > with a system running fishworks, can that pool later be imported by a > standard solaris sys

[zfs-discuss] Storage 7000

2008-11-17 Thread Tim
I'm not sure if this is the right place for the question or not, but I'll throw it out there anyways. Does anyone know, if you create your pool(s) with a system running fishworks, can that pool later be imported by a standard solaris system? IE: If for some reason the head running fishworks were