On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 18:11 -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
I think it is a misnomer to call the current
implementation of ZFS a pure ACL system, as clearly the ACLs are heavily
contaminated by legacy mode bits.
Feel free to open an RFE. It may be a tough sell with PSARC, but maybe
if
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
I suspect at least some of the membership would be interested in this
sort of extension and it shouldn't be that hard to sell if it's not the
default behavior and it's clearly documented that turning it on (probably
on a fs-by-fs basis like every
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
I suspect at least some of the membership would be interested in this
sort of extension and it shouldn't be that hard to sell if it's not the
default behavior and it's clearly documented that turning it on (probably
on a
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
I will go ahead and do a fastrack to get the behavior that many people
want. Basically, if inheritable ACEs are present for owner@, group@,
everyone@ then the inherited ACE permissions will override the requested
mode of the application. If no
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
I will go ahead and do a fastrack to get the behavior that many people
want. Basically, if inheritable ACEs are present for owner@, group@,
everyone@ then the inherited ACE permissions will override the requested
mode of
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:33:57AM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
E.g., how would one mimic:
Jens Elkner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:33:57AM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
E.g.,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Jens Elkner wrote:
We already lost this functionality with the introduction of the NFSv4
ACL crap on ZFS and earned a lot of hate you feedbacks.
I was actually looking forward to ZFS ACLs, as they should have been much
more compatible with Samba/Windows clients.
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
this behavior is only possible from a Windows client. When creating
files from unix the POSIX rules apply and the requestors mode must be
honored, which results in the owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries
always being set
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
That is not correct. The deny entries are necessary for POSIX semantics.
In POSIX are only allowed to pick up permissions from the owner, group or
other class. You can't pick up part of the permissions you are looking
for from the group class and
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
That is not correct. The deny entries are necessary for POSIX semantics.
In POSIX are only allowed to pick up permissions from the owner, group or
other class. You can't pick up part of the permissions you are looking
for
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
--
Darren J Moffat
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Roy Butler wrote:
a NetApp could do some kind of mapping to satisfy
your idea, but of even
that I'd be skeptical.
We eval'd a netapp box. ACL mapping on netapp sucks.
You really need to
either use unix or windows privs, not both.
I run a few NetApp boxes, must
On Mar 13, 2008, at 07:33, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out
user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
It's an option, but not everyone wants
David Magda wrote:
On Mar 13, 2008, at 07:33, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out
user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
It's an option,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
An official supported version of Solaris is a
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
An
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rocky wrote:
I run a few NetApp boxes, must admit I've never noticed the ACL mapping
sucking before. How does yours suck?
It's been almost a year since we evaluated Netapp, I'm a little hazy on the
details.
Basically, NetApp has three different ideas of the permissions
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Richard Elling wrote:
You can get support for SXDE. Perhaps you already have it.
http://www.sun.com/service/subscriptions/sxde.xml
We have a ton of hardware under Silver/Gold support, quite likely we might
already qualify for this, although I was previously unaware of its
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
I have samba configured and integrated into our local active directory,
with ACL mapping working. I'm a little confused as to the behavior of the
ZFS ACL
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
I have samba configured and integrated into our local active directory,
with ACL mapping working. I'm a little confused as to the
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Roy Butler wrote:
CIFS ACLs and NFS ACLs are not on a convergence course, are they? Maybe
NFSv4 ACLs (the ZFS native ACL) are based on CIFS/NT ACLs and virtually
identical. The Sun version of Samba does just about a perfect mapping
between them.
a NetApp could do some
22 matches
Mail list logo
