Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2011-05-10 Thread Thomas Garner
So there is no current way to specify the creation of a 3 disk raid-z array with a known missing disk? On 12/5/06, David Bustos david.bus...@sun.com wrote: Quoth Thomas Garner on Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:15PM -0500: I currently have a 400GB disk that is full of data on a linux system. If I

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2011-05-10 Thread Krzys
Ah, did not see your follow up. Thanks. Chris On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Cindy Swearingen wrote: Sorry, Bart, is correct: If new_device is not specified, it defaults to old_device. This form of replacement is useful after an existing disk has failed and

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2007-11-20 Thread MC
So there is no current way to specify the creation of a 3 disk raid-z array with a known missing disk? Can someone answer that? Or does the zpool command NOT accommodate the creation of a degraded raidz array? This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2007-11-20 Thread Joe Little
On Nov 20, 2007 6:34 AM, MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So there is no current way to specify the creation of a 3 disk raid-z array with a known missing disk? Can someone answer that? Or does the zpool command NOT accommodate the creation of a degraded raidz array? can't started

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2006-12-05 Thread David Bustos
Quoth Thomas Garner on Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:15PM -0500: I currently have a 400GB disk that is full of data on a linux system. If I buy 2 more disks and put them into a raid-z'ed zfs under solaris, is there a generally accepted way to build an degraded array with the 2 disks, copy the

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2006-12-05 Thread Thomas Garner
So there is no current way to specify the creation of a 3 disk raid-z array with a known missing disk? On 12/5/06, David Bustos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoth Thomas Garner on Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:15PM -0500: I currently have a 400GB disk that is full of data on a linux system. If I buy

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2006-11-30 Thread Tim Foster
Hi Krzys, On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 12:09 -0500, Krzys wrote: my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? You should be able to do this using zpool replace. There's output below from me simulating your situation with file-based pools. This is documented in Chapters 7 and 10 of the ZFS admin

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2006-11-30 Thread Bart Smaalders
Krzys wrote: my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10 U2 (by the way, I thought U3 would be out in November, will it be out soon? does anyone know? [11:35:14] server11: /export/home/me zpool status -x pool: mypool2 state: DEGRADED status: One or more

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2006-11-30 Thread Krzys
Great, thank you, it certainly helped, I did not want to loose data on that disk therefore wanted to be sure than sorry thanks for help. Chris On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Bart Smaalders wrote: Krzys wrote: my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10 U2 (by the

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2006-11-30 Thread Krzys
Ah, did not see your follow up. Thanks. Chris On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Cindy Swearingen wrote: Sorry, Bart, is correct: If new_device is not specified, it defaults to old_device. This form of replacement is useful after an existing disk has failed and

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz DEGRADED state

2006-11-30 Thread Thomas Garner
In the same vein... I currently have a 400GB disk that is full of data on a linux system. If I buy 2 more disks and put them into a raid-z'ed zfs under solaris, is there a generally accepted way to build an degraded array with the 2 disks, copy the data to the new filesystem, and then move the