So, another hardware question :)
ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the point
where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather than
having to throw more expensive RAID arrays at it.
Only trouble is.. JBODs seem to have disappeared :(
Sun/O
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Philip Brown wrote:
> So, another hardware question :)
>
> ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the
> point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather
> than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays a
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Philip Brown wrote:
> So, another hardware question :)
>
> ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the
> point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather
> than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays a
p...@bolthole.com said:
> Any other suggestions for (large-)enterprise-grade, supported JBOD hardware
> for ZFS these days? Either fibre or SAS would be okay.
As others have said, it depends on your definition of "enterprise-grade".
We're using Dell's MD1200 SAS JBOD's with Solaris-10 and ZFS. O
On 1/25/2011 2:19 PM, Marion Hakanson wrote:
The only special tuning I had to do was turn off round-robin load-balancing
in the mpxio configuration. The Seagate drives were incredibly slow when
running in round-robin mode, very speedy without.
Interesting. Did you switch to the load-balance op
tmcmah...@yahoo.com said:
> Interesting. Did you switch to the load-balance option?
Yes, I ended up with "load-balance=none". Here's a thread about
it in the storage-discuss mailing list:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=130975&tstart=90
Regards,
Marion
...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Philip Brown
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:05 AM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
So, another hardware question :)
ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the
point where it can be used
On 25/01/2011, at 19.04, Philip Brown wrote:
> So, another hardware question :)
>
> ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the
> point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather
> than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays at it.
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Lasse Osterild wrote:
>
> On 25/01/2011, at 19.04, Philip Brown wrote:
>>
>> Any other suggestions for (large-)enterprise-grade, supported JBOD hardware
>> for ZFS these days?
>> Either fibre or SAS would be okay.
>> --
>
> I'd go with some Dell MD1200's, for us t
> -Original Message-
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
> [mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Philip Brown
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:05 AM
> To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
>
&g
On 01/26/11 09:50 AM, Lasse Osterild wrote:
I'd go with some Dell MD1200's, for us they ended up being cheaper (incl disks)
than a SuperMicro case with the same model disks, and it's way nicer than the
low-quality SuperMicro stuff.
That's an odd comment. I've used a fair bit of SuperMicro k
On Tue, Jan 25 at 21:28, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Lasse Osterild wrote:
On 25/01/2011, at 19.04, Philip Brown wrote:
Any other suggestions for (large-)enterprise-grade, supported JBOD hardware for
ZFS these days?
Either fibre or SAS would be okay.
--
I'd go wi
wn
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:05 AM
> To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
>
> So, another hardware question :)
>
> ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the
> point where it can be used effic
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Philip Brown wrote:
> So, another hardware question :)
>
> ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the
> point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather
> than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays a
On 25/01/2011, at 22.39, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 01/26/11 09:50 AM, Lasse Osterild wrote:
>> I'd go with some Dell MD1200's, for us they ended up being cheaper (incl
>> disks) than a SuperMicro case with the same model disks, and it's way nicer
>> than the low-quality SuperMicro stuff.
>
> That
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Lasse Osterild wrote:
>> On 01/26/11 09:50 AM, Lasse Osterild wrote:
>> That's an odd comment. I've used a fair bit of SuperMicro kit over the
>> years and I wouldn't describe any of it as "low-quality".
>
> Nothing odd about it - I've had three SC847E26-JBOD cas
chip work with major RAID
controller card.
Rocky
-Original Message-
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:pa...@iki.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 1:30 PM
To: Rocky Shek
Cc: 'Philip Brown'; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBOD
#x27;
> Cc: 'Philip Brown'; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
>
> Pasi,
>
> I have not tried the Opensolaris FMA yet.
>
> But we have developed a tool called DSM that allow users to locate disk
>
011 7:02
> > To: 'Pasi Kärkkäinen'
> > Cc: 'Philip Brown'; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
> >
> > Pasi,
> >
> > I have not tried the Opensolaris FMA yet.
> >
> > B
Khushil,
Thanks.
Fred
From: Khushil Dep [mailto:khushil@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期一, 一月 31, 2011 17:37
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Rocky Shek; Pasi Kärkkäinen; Philip Brown; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
You should also check out VA Technologies
: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
Khushil,
Thanks.
Fred
From: Khushil Dep [mailto:khushil@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期一, 一月 31, 2011 17:37
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Rocky Shek; Pasi Kärkkäinen; Philip Brown; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable
21 matches
Mail list logo
