> Should I bfu to the latest bits to fix this
> problem or do I also need to install b72?
bfu to b72 (or newer) should be OK, iff there really is
a difference with shared library dependencies between
b70 and b72. I'm not sure about b70; but b72 with
just an empty /usr directory in the root files
Thanks, you're my hero... Should I bfu to the latest bits to fix this
problem or do I also need to install b72?
On 01/10/2007, at 8:22 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
>> I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
>> b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
On 01/10/2007, at 7:46 PM, James C. McPherson wrote:
> Kugutsumen wrote:
>> I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
>> b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
>> broken dependencies.
>> 1/ Part of the problem is that /sbin/zpool is linked t
> I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
> b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
> broken dependencies.
>
> 1/ Part of the problem is that /sbin/zpool is linked to
> /usr/lib/libdiskmgt.so.1
Yep, in the past this happened on several occas
Kugutsumen wrote:
> I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
> b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
> broken dependencies.
> 1/ Part of the problem is that /sbin/zpool is linked to /usr/lib/
> libdiskmgt.so.1
> 2/ There are probably other br
I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
broken dependencies.
1/ Part of the problem is that /sbin/zpool is linked to /usr/lib/
libdiskmgt.so.1
2/ There are probably other broken dependencies since I've
