As I said a few years ago on this list, this is why we have not and will not
ever carry any book from Signature Books in our LDS bookstore. My wife is
kinder and gentler than I. When people ask why we don't have certain books,
she just says that we don't buy from that publisher, and that is all
If the Book of Mormon is not historical, then the Church is false, and
Joseph Smith was no prophet. Knowing this, Satan and his mortal
followers
make their most sophisticated attacks upon mankind by attacking the
historicity of the Book of Mormon.
Further more, according to my testimony IF
I can't argue with your overall approach, but I would point out that not all of
their books are polemical. You have to look at each title on its own merits. But I
don't think there's any doubt where the sympathies of the publisher's owners,
George Smith, lie. In this JWR's paranoia is probably
After much pondering, Jim Cobabe favored us with:
Not really anything new here. Just more evil detractors continuing the
attempt to dilute and de-emphasise sacred doctrines of the Church, so
that it becomes indistinguishable from other corrupt sects. It is
becoming quite respectable in the
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 09:44 PM, Jim Cobabe wrote:
Saturday, November 30, 2002
BY PATTY HENETZ
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
A graduate student at the University of Washington says he likely
will be excommunicated next week for articles he has written
questioning
the validity of
Jim Cobabe:
Saturday, November 30, 2002
BY PATTY HENETZ
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
A graduate student at the University of Washington says
he likely will be excommunicated next week for articles he
has written questioning the validity of the Book of Mormon.
Harold Stuart:
I've actually read this
Perhaps this might help. Richley Crapo is an LDS anthropologist at Utah State
(Logan). This is forwarded from Scripture-L with his permission:
My initial reference is from information provided to me by Lou Midgley at BYU, and
I also have his permission to quote him on Murphy's lack of
Just a couple more things...
Our intrepid Signaturus writes:
There were no Lamanites prior to c. 1828
This cannot be shown from his data. As I said in my last post, he has
no idea what the Lamanite genome looks like. He is only guessing. It
is not likely to be what he thinks it is.
Oh. Should have added one more minor thing. BoMor is a contraction preferred by
Brent Metcalfe, who edited the book in which this paper appeared, and who likewise
does not believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon -- Metcalfe was exxed I
think sometime after the infamous September Six. No
At 07:18 PM 12/1/02 -0700, Marc A. Schindler wrote:
Oh. Should have added one more minor thing. BoMor is a contraction
preferred by
Brent Metcalfe, who edited the book in which this paper appeared, and who
likewise
does not believe in the historicity of the Book of Mormon -- Metcalfe was
exxed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
Is there a link to the AP article (or others) or to the paper
itself?
---
http://www.sltrib.com/2002/nov/11302002/saturday/7024.htm
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
///
In Germany we used to refer to attempts to place Books of Mormons (usually in
small Pensionen or inns) as buming, which is Missionary German. It's
pronounced booming and comes from BuM (das Buch Mormon), pronounced boom but
with a relatively short duration oo. When you dangle a child on your knee
Jim Cobabe wrote:
Not really anything new here. Just more evil detractors continuing the
attempt to dilute and de-emphasise sacred doctrines of the Church, so
that it becomes indistinguishable from other corrupt sects. It is
Not to disagree with you in principle, but just to pick a nit:
13 matches
Mail list logo
