Chris McDonough wrote:
See the egg intro doc at http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/
PythonEggs .
I've scanned that before... Jim's mentioned some pretty deep and
interesting stuff, I wondered if he'd found more in-depth docs or
whether I was just missing stuff on that page...
Chris
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
apt-get install wwwoffle :-)
C:\Zopeapt-get install wwwoffle
'apt-get' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
:-(
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Jim Fulton wrote:
2. I think a real packaging system, like eggs would have helped here.
Eggs in particular would have allowed multiple versions of
zope.interface
to be installed. Zope would have gotten the version it needed and ZODB
would have gotten the version it needed. (Hm, maybe
Hi!
Somewhere I have red (in a blog) comparing java and python. If I
remember well the main reason to write that was the Boa (?) constructor
written by java programmers...
So: It states that Python packages should be as flat as possible (use
less names in the namespace (?)), since the name
Package depth has no impact on performance (at least that I've
noticed). It's almost certainly not the primary reason for any given
Python program to be slow. I'd like to read that blog entry to see
if that person knows more than I do.
As far as eggs go, AFAIK, package depth is not
[replying to private email here, with permission]
[Egon Frerich]
maybe you are interested in this.
I installed Zope 3 (version 3.2) in python 2.4.2 site-packages (Windows
XP Home - but I assume this is not important).
Windows isn't relevant to the problem you hit, no.
Then I installed