-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kit BLAKE wrote:
> Hi Tres,
>>- Extension Classes were rewritten as Python new-style classes making
>> all features of Python new-style classes available in Zope
>> objects. This includes support for cyclic garbage collection.
>
> Does t
--On 20. Juli 2006 20:48:16 +0200 Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
return
self.context.REQUEST.RESPONSE.redirect(some_url_plus_query_string)
valid but very ugly. Why not just return the result of the call of a
template?
You might be interested have the original page under the
Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 20. Juli 2006 19:25:11 +0100 Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> My simple webpage for submitting files is ok. It calls a External
>> Method script to do all the dirty job. However, I am running out of
>> ideas of how to get back to my default submitting
--On 20. Juli 2006 19:25:11 +0100 Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
My simple webpage for submitting files is ok. It calls a External
Method script to do all the dirty job. However, I am running out of
ideas of how to get back to my default submitting web page after
submitting a file (and t
Hi!
My simple webpage for submitting files is ok. It calls a External
Method script to do all the dirty job. However, I am running out of
ideas of how to get back to my default submitting web page after
submitting a file (and thus execute the script).
Any idea would be very welcome.
Thanks in ad
On 7/20/06, Garito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you think?
I realize this is probably because English isn't your first language,
but I completely failed to understand there what your application does
or tries to accomplish. I just cannot reconstruct what the application
should do for your
I couldn't reproduce this behavior. When I try to make such assignement (myObject.title='The new title'), Zope returns this messageattribute-less object (assign or del)
I'm using Zope 2.7.6-final, python 2.3.4.
Jose Henrique2006/7/18, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 18 Jul 2006 19:12:54 -0
Martijn Pieters escribió:
On 7/20/06, Garito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, we need a use-case. Otherwise you have what we call a YAGNI, a
"You
> aint gonna need it" feature that noone will maintain because noone
uses it.
>
> A vague notion that you'd like to see this for your application is
On 7/20/06, Garito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, we need a use-case. Otherwise you have what we call a YAGNI, a "You
> aint gonna need it" feature that noone will maintain because noone uses it.
>
> A vague notion that you'd like to see this for your application is not a
> use-case.
>
I use th
Garito wrote:
Martijn Pieters escribió:
Please don't email me personally; let's keep this discussion on the list.
Garito wrote:
Yes, the indexes depends on the entity (I don't know what indexes I use
until I define the entity but I need to catalog every characteristic of
the entity)
For exa
Martijn Pieters escribió:
Please don't email me personally; let's keep this discussion on the list.
Garito wrote:
Yes, the indexes depends on the entity (I don't know what indexes I use
until I define the entity but I need to catalog every characteristic of
the entity)
For example if I have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roberto Benitez wrote:
file="%s" % context.textfile
Huh? Isn't that just a weird and probably inefficient way of writing
"file=str(context.textfile)"?
Sso I was mistaken when I said \n were removed... I can indeed split by
'\n' the result of str(contex
Please don't email me personally; let's keep this discussion on the list.
Garito wrote:
> Yes, the indexes depends on the entity (I don't know what indexes I use
> until I define the entity but I need to catalog every characteristic of
> the entity)
>
> For example if I have a entity with a conta
> Roberto Benitez wrote:
>> file="%s" % context.textfile
Huh? Isn't that just a weird and probably inefficient way of writing
"file=str(context.textfile)"?
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross post
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
...
Sure, but I can't create a new product for every product I'll
use only
to do it catalog aware, isn't it?
(Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:00:09PM -0400) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Catalog aware
Andreas Jung wrote:
> > It makes little sense to index the contents of PTs. PTs are used to
> > present a view on a particular instance of your class but not for
> > providing con
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
...
Sure, but I can't create a new product for every product I'll
use only
to do it catalog aware, isn't it?
Yes you can
On 7/20/06, Garito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please read the catalog section again: there isnt the object in the
> catalog!
> Again: The object is _not_ in the catalog.
> Its all about usefull indexes and maybe object metadata.
> So again: _what_ actually do you expect to find?
When I talk abo
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
...
Sure, but I can't create a new product for every product I'll
use only
to do it catalog aware, isn't it?
Yes you can. Why not? I
Roberto Benitez wrote:
The following worked for me:
with a file object containing the following text:
line one of test file
line two of test file
line three of test file
I was table to parse lines w/ following code:
file="%s" % context.textfile
num=1
for line in file.split("\n"):
prin
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
...
Sure, but I can't create a new product for every product I'll use
only
to do it catalog aware, isn't it?
Yes you can. Why not? I mean you are using them -
Hi Tres,
- Extension Classes were rewritten as Python new-style classes making
all features of Python new-style classes available in Zope
objects. This includes support for cyclic garbage collection.
Does this mean that the following is fixed? Quoting from the Zope
2.9.4 CHANGES.tx
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
Tino Wildenhain escribió:
Garito wrote:
...
Sure, but I can't create a new product for every product I'll use only
to do it catalog aware, isn't it?
Yes you can. Why not? I mean you are using them - so you can
23 matches
Mail list logo
