The Zope developer community I is pleased to announce the release
of Zope 2.10.2.
You can download Zope 2.10.2 from:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.2/
This release uses unicode as internal representation for ZPT. For this
reason you are strongly encouraged to read
--On 25. Januar 2007 18:37:03 +0100 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Zope developer community I is pleased to announce the release
of Zope 2.10.2.
You can download Zope 2.10.2 from:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.2/
This release uses unicode as internal representation
Log message for revision 72221:
preparing 2.10.2
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/2.10/inst/WinBuilders/mk/zope.mk
U Zope/branches/2.10/inst/versions.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt
Log message for revision 7:
Zope 2.10.2
Changed:
A Zope/tags/2.10.2/
-=-
Copied: Zope/tags/2.10.2 (from rev 72221, Zope/branches/2.10)
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Jan 24 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Thu Jan 25 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 7 messages: 7 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.6 Python-2.1.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Wed Jan 24 21:07:46 EST 2007
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
For their upcoming versions, Zope 2 consuming platforms such as Plone
are creating standard Zope3-style Python packages while still having
Zope 2 products around. This proposal aims at unifying the deployment
of products and Python packages into a Zope 2
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
This proposal aims at bringing Zope 2 a bit closer to Zope 3 by making
the widely used Acquisition API aware of Zope 3's __parent__ pointers.
This will alleviate the need of using Acquisition base classes in Zope 2
for every security-sensitive object,
On Thu, 2007-25-01 at 05:07 -0800, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I do wonder what would happen if you had both lib/python/Products/CMFCore
and Products/CMFCore, though. Would there be an explicit preference or would
Zope fail to start up with a conflict? I think I'd prefer the latter, in
fact, so that
Rocky Burt wrote:
On Thu, 2007-25-01 at 05:07 -0800, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I do wonder what would happen if you had both lib/python/Products/CMFCore
and Products/CMFCore, though. Would there be an explicit preference or would
Zope fail to start up with a conflict? I think I'd prefer the latter,
whit wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
This is awesome, and by that I don't mean the fact that we have a
plone buildout, but that we actually have Zope 2 recipes for
buildout. I hope they can be moved to svn.zope.org for further
development to benefit the whole
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
The point is that buildout *already* handles eggs. There's really no
point for having an extra layer on top of buildout. The zc.recipe.egg
recipe can install any egg (as a development one or not) in an automated
fashion, which is exactly what you'd want from a
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
whit wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
This is awesome, and by that I don't mean the fact that we have a
plone buildout, but that we actually have Zope 2 recipes for
buildout. I hope they can be moved to svn.zope.org for further
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:45:26 -0800, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plone stinks!
It's like a fine cheese.
--
Alexander Limi · http://limi.net
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
whit wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
This is awesome, and by that I don't mean the fact that we have a
plone buildout, but that we actually have Zope 2 recipes for
buildout. I hope they can be moved to svn.zope.org for further
whit wrote:
Not everybody likes the activate dance. With buildout, you don't need
it. The recipes make sure that the scripts that get installed into the
buildout's 'bin' directory have the right PYTHONPATH set and have
access to the eggs you requested for the buildout.
is there really a
I hate to jump into this thread but I'll make a few comments.
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:13 PM, whit wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
whit wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
This is awesome, and by that I don't mean the fact that we have
a plone
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
Whit pointed me to this thread.
Yeah, someone pointed me to it too. :)
I won't reply to specifics, but maybe
just describe what we're doing (and planning to do), and how
workingenv
differs from zc.buildout.
I'll avoid responding to
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
workingenv is development-centric, while buildout is deployment-
centric. This does not necessarily mean the best tool for the
job, because focusing on development and ignore deployment isn't a
good job, nor the other way around.
buildout
Jim Fulton wrote:
If *Plone* becomes incompatible with workingenv that'd be bothersome
I agree.
But if a buildout is incompatible, eh... who knows,
I would hope that buildout would not have to be compatible with
workingenv, whatever that means, in order for Plone to be compatible.
Then
Rob Miller wrote:
honestly, it seems to me that buildout tries to do too much. it's trying to
handle both repeatable deployment recipes AND providing a sandbox within which
to run things. there may not be a point to having an extra layer on top of
buildout, but buildout sure does seem to me
Jim Fulton wrote:
I actually tried to do this once before with zc.buildout, but I didn't
get far -- probably a result of lack of effort and lack of familiarity
with the overall stack. But I also recognize lots of the questions
about stuff like the zope.conf file and Data.fs that still seem
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Rob Miller wrote:
honestly, it seems to me that buildout tries to do too much. it's
trying to handle both repeatable deployment recipes AND providing a
sandbox within which to run things. there may not be a point to
having an extra layer on top of buildout, but
For some environments I need to be able to add a role for people coming
from a specific IP address (for example to add a role everyone on
campus). At the moment PAS does not support that: roles are determined
in the _findUser method but not in _createAnonymousUser.
Are there any reasons for not
On 1/24/07, Maciej Wisniowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another question, do you use ZEO? I know there were some issues
with _p_resolveConflict and ZEO (at last in Zope 2.8.x). Result
was that with ZEO setup _p_resolveConflict was not called at all.
There is solution for this but I don't know if
Hello,
I've got a script located in /wms/Ccp/Main/TeamLead/Scripts and it needs
to reference a workflow object in /wms/Ccp/Main/Workflows/Ccp/ .
Currently, we do this by issuing this line :
wf = context.Workflows.Ccp.ccp_agro_article
But everytime we run this, a username/password prompt
Hi!
We have a very busy site that required zserver-threads to be bumped to 10.
My understanding is DB connections (pool_size) is hardwired to 7, no
knob to adjust, and it should match the number of zserver-threads.
We do get warnings in the logs, so I should fix it.
Create a custom_zodb.py and
Dieter, thank you for the suggestion on how to change
\lib\python\OFS\DTMLMethod.py
to avoid the key error.
Before I went ahead and altered zope's the underlying code, I thought I would
try Andres' suggestion first, by rewriting the dtml method as a python script:
REQUEST = container.REQUEST
Murdock wrote:
Example:
http://www.domain.com/Customer should go to ColdFusion and actual files on
the server
everything else at http://www.domain.com should feed into Zope
I am running Windows Server 2003, IIS6, EnfoldProxy, Latest version of Zope
2.
Dunnoy what EnfoldPoxy is or how it
On Jan 25, 2007 12:14 PM, Brian wrote:
Hi!
We have a very busy site that required zserver-threads to be bumped to
10.
My understanding is DB connections (pool_size) is hardwired to 7, no
knob to adjust, and it should match the number of zserver-threads.
We do get warnings in the logs, so I
snip
- Original Message -
From: Sinang, Danny
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:36 AM
Subject: [Zope] URL referencing
Hello,
I've got a script located in /wms/Ccp/Main/TeamLead/Scripts and it needs to
reference a workflow object in /wms/Ccp/Main/Workflows/Ccp/ .
Thanks for the suggestion, I went to that site and I see that it only works
on Unix-Like servers. I don't have any of those available in my environment.
Jaroslav Lukesh wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am implementing a new site using Zope/Plone. This
Can you point me to some good documentation that can get me up and running
with Apache quickly, as well as how to use the rewrite rules?
Thanks
Chris Withers wrote:
Murdock wrote:
Example:
http://www.domain.com/Customer should go to ColdFusion and actual files
on
the server
everything
- Original Message -
From: Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ColdFusion, ASP, etc with Zope/Plone
Can you point me to some good documentation that can get me up and running
with Apache quickly, as well as how to
Is _p_resolveConflict method of Inceraser executed at all?
I wonder if traceback you see in console is from the
code you added:
traceback.print_exc(file=stdin)
or it is always shown when there is a conflict error.
code
def _p_resolveConflict(self, old, state1, state2):
print called the
Concerning zeo, I do not use it in the developpement plateforme, but there's
one in the test and production platformes, so maybe I will face the problem
during the test phase.
I do not understand : session objects should be unique for each browser, so
why are there conflict errors on them ?
Hi,
We're using Zope 2.8.8 with a bunch of client sites set up in various
sub directories / databases. We're using ZEO for the database storage
and a local zodb file for the temporary data.
I've recently been asked to set the system to user sessions time out
after 15 minutes of activity. I've
--On 25. Januar 2007 09:59:44 -0500 Sale, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
We're using Zope 2.8.8 with a bunch of client sites set up in various
sub directories / databases. We're using ZEO for the database storage
and a local zodb file for the temporary data.
I've recently been asked
Murdock wrote:
Anyone know of any good open source or very low cost Reverse Proxies that
will run on Windows Server?
Please trim your replies.
Apache is what you're looking for.
You've been pointed at the docs, further help can be found on #apache on
irc.freenode.net
cheers,
Chris
--
Andreas, thank you for replying.
Actually, the problem I have is the reverse - the sessions NEVER seem to
time out. I have a directive from up on high to make it so that 15
minutes of inactivity within any location on the site (All of which is
password protected under acl_users or
Is their a method to get most things to Zope/Plone but certain folders to go
to ColdFusion.
Does ColdFusion have an API which can be called from Python or Perl? Does it
have an XML-RPC, SOAP or other web API interface? If so then you could write a
Zope External Method in Python or Perl that
The Zope developer community I is pleased to announce the release
of Zope 2.10.2.
You can download Zope 2.10.2 from:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.2/
This release uses unicode as internal representation for ZPT. For this
reason you are strongly encouraged to read
yacine chaouche wrote at 2007-1-24 18:23 +0100:
As Gabriel Genellina said earlier in this discussion, the probleme could
come from the dicoLignes variable that is stored in the session.I don't get
it, the exception says that the Increaser object is responsible of the
conflict error :
Kirk Strauser wrote at 2007-1-24 13:16 -0600:
...
Before I start on such an adventure, what is the Python/Zope term for what
I'm trying to do, specifically to allow the import of an entire module,
including classes inside it, and methods inside those classes' objects?
With allow_module you
Sale, Robin wrote at 2007-1-25 09:59 -0500:
...
I've recently been asked to set the system to user sessions time out
after 15 minutes of activity. I've changed the setting in our zope.conf
file (the session timeout value) and restarted zope. However, if I open
a page on the site that requires
Dieter,
Thank you for your reply.
Originally was a customer-driven need to have them as long as possible
for some time, but now there is a management need to make sessions as
short as possible to increase security. My big concern is that my
predecessor may have done some serious deep-down
Does anyone if there is a product (specifically for zope) for creating a
captcha image to verify that an actual human is submitting a form?
I am using zope 2.8.1 with python 2.3.5 on a windows server. I am currently
looking into this:
http://captchas.net/sample/python/
I'd like to sort the items in a folder by relevance, relevance being a
property I've assigned.
I'm using a python script
for aj in ao.objectItems(items):
aao=aj[1] #the object
title=aao.title
id=aj[0]
aanum=len(aao.objectIds())
--On 25. Januar 2007 15:03:19 -0500 Kate Legere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
values=ao.objectItems(items)
values.sort(lambda a,b: cmp(a[0],b[0]))
Error Type: AttributeError
Error Value: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'sort'
This error message is self-explaining. You can
I've looked at the debugging page in the control panel, but it doesn't
tell me anything I recognize as useful.
Are you sure that your authentication uses session? Maybe it uses
cookies? Try to set variable in the session on one page and display this
on the other one. Then wait for 15-20 minutes
Does anyone if there is a product (specifically for zope) for creating a
captcha image to verify that an actual human is submitting a form?
I am using zope 2.8.1 with python 2.3.5 on a windows server. I am
currently looking into this:
http://captchas.net/sample/python/
AFAIK there is
Thank you for your reply.
I'm guessing that yes, Zope is using session cookies in this setup.
Unfortunately, the people who did the original configuration and setup
are no longer with my company, so I can't ask directly. How would I be
able to tell if it's set one way or another? I certainly
I'm guessing that yes, Zope is using session cookies in this setup.
Unfortunately, the people who did the original configuration and setup
are no longer with my company, so I can't ask directly. How would I be
able to tell if it's set one way or another? I certainly see nothing
about cookie
from scratch without google/sf/fm :o)
1. pound with linux and colinux kernel runtime on windows
2. pound with linux under vmware or old pre-M$ virtualPC on windows
3. pound under cygwin on windows
4. squid under windows
5. apache under windows
6. IIS - M$ ISA (?)
- Original Message -
I'm trying to get an object by walking a path. Previously, I used
baseobject.unrestrictedTraverse(path). Upon migrating to 2.10.1,
though, doing the same thing often produces the following error:
File /usr/local/zenoss/Products/ZenModel/Organizer.py, line 148, in
getOrganizer
return
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 05:31:28AM -0800, Murdock wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, I went to that site and I see that it only works
on Unix-Like servers. I don't have any of those available in my environment.
you could run vmware and put a linux instance there.
Jaroslav Lukesh wrote:
--On 25. Januar 2007 16:12:01 -0500 Ian McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get an object by walking a path. Previously, I used
baseobject.unrestrictedTraverse(path). Upon migrating to 2.10.1, though,
doing the same thing often produces the following error:
Migrating from
--On 25. Januar 2007 18:37:03 +0100 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Zope developer community I is pleased to announce the release
of Zope 2.10.2.
You can download Zope 2.10.2 from:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.2/
This release uses unicode as internal representation
--On 26. Januar 2007 07:37:25 + Graziella Toutoungis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I use zope2.9.4 with postgresql8.1, in my database i have some tables are
the result of a query on other tables. exe: table1 is the result of
table2 with table3
My
user can connect to the database
58 matches
Mail list logo
