David Pratt wrote:
for this feedback. I will be evaluating this option as well. There are
differences in licensing that may be a factor in what I decide to use
after some evaluation. BSD with XUF compared to MIT with
SimpleUserFolder.
Huh?! What exactly is the problems with the MIT licens
Hi Garth. Yes, it is very compact compared to XUF for sure. Thank you
for this feedback. I will be evaluating this option as well. There are
differences in licensing that may be a factor in what I decide to use
after some evaluation. BSD with XUF compared to MIT with
SimpleUserFolder. I have
For what it's worth, I recently used the SimpleUserFolder for an
application that uses Postgres as the backend. It was terrifically
easy to implement authentication through Postgres via the
SimpleUserFolder. It does exactly what I want without unnecessary
frill or complications.
Garth
On 7/15/
David Pratt wrote at 2005-7-14 20:30 -0300:
>Thanks Dieter. I was really hoping it is a good solution since it is
>the only User Folder product for Postgres that I have seen thus far.
Chris Withers would tell you, that "Simple User Folder" can do this
as well :-)
--
Dieter
_
David Pratt wrote:
I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of this
combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on how this
solution is working for them. Many thanks.
You might want to take a look at SimpleUserFolder. It's a lot more light
weight that
Thanks Tino and Andrew. This is all useful feedback.
Regards,
David
On Friday, July 15, 2005, at 05:11 AM, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Am Freitag, den 15.07.2005, 16:25 +1000 schrieb Andrew Milton:
+---[ Tino Wildenhain ]--
| Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 12:46 -0300 schri
Am Freitag, den 15.07.2005, 16:25 +1000 schrieb Andrew Milton:
> +---[ Tino Wildenhain ]--
> | Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 12:46 -0300 schrieb David Pratt:
> | > I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of
> | > this combination that could share f
+---[ Tino Wildenhain ]--
| Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 12:46 -0300 schrieb David Pratt:
| > I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of
| > this combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on
| > how this solution is working for
Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 12:46 -0300 schrieb David Pratt:
> I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of
> this combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on
> how this solution is working for them. Many thanks.
I use it but in a very hacked up form
Thanks Dieter. I was really hoping it is a good solution since it is
the only User Folder product for Postgres that I have seen thus far.
Regards
David
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, at 06:49 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
David Pratt wrote at 2005-7-14 12:46 -0300:
I am looking at using the ExUserFo
David Pratt wrote at 2005-7-14 12:46 -0300:
>I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of
>this combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on
>how this solution is working for them.
We use it and are satisfied with it.
--
Dieter
Hi David
We are using the combo, although in a very plain form. We use a
custom table for users and have implemented any additional
functionality in our own way. So we use XUF/pg for handling security
in Zope. This works on global roles, assigned in the table record,
but also with local r
I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of
this combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on
how this solution is working for them. Many thanks.
David
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org
13 matches
Mail list logo