-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
>> From: Zope Tests
>> Date: Sun Oct 26 22:03:25 EDT 2008
>> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010375.html
>
> Sidnei,
>
> First,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> Is this a typo?
Yes, thanks for the catch.
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> def f13():
>> -assert any([True, True, True]) == True
>> -assert any([True, False, True]) == True
>> -assert any(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
> From: Zope Tests
> Date: Sun Oct 26 22:03:25 EDT 2008
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010375.html
Sidnei,
First, thanks for working to get the
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please create branches first and then lets review the changes.
Great.
> What is the
> state of the compatability of Z3 modules with Python 2.5/2.6 as used in Zope
> 2.10/2.11?
Hard to tell at this point.
--
Sidnei da Si
On 27.10.2008 18:55 Uhr, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Jung<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why do we need these backports on the current maintenance branches?
They are small cleanups that could potentially allow someone to run
Python 2.5 or 2.6 if they really real
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do we need these backports on the current maintenance branches?
They are small cleanups that could potentially allow someone to run
Python 2.5 or 2.6 if they really really really wanted to, but note
should be made that
Hi all,
I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for
Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10. The fixes that would
be backported would only be those that deal with syntax changes (eg:
'with' and 'as' keyword being used as variables, relative imports) and
some C-level c
On 27.10.2008 18:36 Uhr, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for
Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10. The fixes that would
be backported would only be those that deal with syntax changes (eg:
'with' and 'as' keyword being used
I agree with Tres. A lot more can be done with Indexes and Catalog
without caching.
The most exiciting development in Catalog optimizations comes out
Jarn. Helge Tesdal (iirc) did a buncha work at a RDBMS company when
he was in college. He has a protoype of a query plan for ZCatalog.
http://w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roché Compaan wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Roché Compaan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:20 +0200, Hedley Roos wrote:
> Have you measures the time needs
On 27.10.2008 17:18 Uhr, Rudá Porto Filgueiras wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andreas Jung<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 27.10.2008 16:28 Uhr, Rudá Porto Filgueiras wrote:
I will sugest a package called zope.memcached (like zope.sqlalchemy
does for SQLAlchemy integration).
That way a
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27.10.2008 16:28 Uhr, Rudá Porto Filgueiras wrote:
>
>> I will sugest a package called zope.memcached (like zope.sqlalchemy
>> does for SQLAlchemy integration).
>> That way any application who need to talk memcached can
On 27.10.2008 16:28 Uhr, Rudá Porto Filgueiras wrote:
I will sugest a package called zope.memcached (like zope.sqlalchemy
does for SQLAlchemy integration).
That way any application who need to talk memcached can do it with out
loose atomicit.
I don't see a particular reason for creating a new
Roché,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Roché Compaan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that one should look at improving performance without caching as
> well. But this is a lot harder and takes significantly more development
> and debugging time than introducing some form caching. So I'm not
On 27 Oct 2008, at 13:10, Roché Compaan wrote:
Improving the performance of indexes is really really hard. In this
case
I really don't think caching is a band-aid, it is a good solution.
Even
with optimised indexes, you will find that you need caching to get
reasonable performance i
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:41 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> >> When it comes to integrating anything in Zope itself I'd choose th
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 12:42 +, Russ Ferriday wrote:
> Have you looked at whether you are overflowing the zeocache and having
> to fetch your catalog from disk too often? The timing mentioned in
> this thread seems about right for that to be the case.
>
> I have a client with about a 300k small
Have you looked at whether you are overflowing the zeocache and having
to fetch your catalog from disk too often? The timing mentioned in
this thread seems about right for that to be the case.
I have a client with about a 300k small documents, for whom I have
separated the catalog from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> When it comes to integrating anything in Zope itself I'd choose the
>> latter.
>
> Sure, we're not trying to get this into Zope, we're just
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:08 , Roché Compaan wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> >> - Plone uses too many indexes, and in particular, uses multiple text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:08 , Roché Compaan wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> - Plone uses too many indexes, and in particular, uses multiple text
>> indexes. Having extra indexes around "just in case" is a sure lose
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Roché Compaan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:20 +0200, Hedley Roos wrote:
> >>> Have you measures the time needs for some "standard" ZCatalog queries
> >>> used with a Plone site with t
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Oct 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Oct 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:03:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:35:09AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> > Log message for revision 92597:
> >- Revert to an older zope.testing. New one is way too new
>
> Before:
>
> > testing
> > svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.testing/tags/3.5.3/src/zope/tes
24 matches
Mail list logo
