Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19

On 06.09.2012, at 10:58, Marius Gedminas wrote: > How do you redirect the stderr of a process spawned with > suprocess.Popen(shell=False) to /dev/null in a cross-platform manner? os.devnull perhaps? Or rather, what about subprocess.Popen(cmd, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)? Stefan -- St

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/ `setHeader('Set-Cookie', ...)` special-casing can die

key > -self.headers[name] = value > +name = literal and name or key > +self.headers[name] = value > > def appendHeader(self, name, value, delimiter=", "): > """ Append a value to an

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: No messages

10 UTC to Sun Mar 28 11:00:00 2010 UTC. >> There were no messages. > > Eeek. Something broken? -- Stefan H. Holek ste...@epy.co.at ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev **

[Zope-dev] Automated Acceptance Test

at use Zope 3 technology. > > > > Best regards > > Carlos Solis > -- Stefan H. Holek ste...@epy.co.at ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML enc

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

pen-ended slicing ops in Python C extensions are borken in python > 2.4, because it doesn't have Py_ssize_t. -- Stefan H. Holek ste...@epy.co.at ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev **

[Zope-dev] Linux x86_64 [Was: Zope Tests: 3 OK, 5 Failed]

Jul 17 20:56:01 EDT 2009 > URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-July/012085.html > > Subject: FAILED (failures=7) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.2 : > Linux > From: Zope Tests > Date: Fri Jul 17 20:58:01 EDT 2009 > URL: ht

Re: [Zope-dev] [cmf-tests] UNKNOWN : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux

What's the reason zope.component.interfaces has no BBB for this import? The Zope Toolkit is full of 'deprecated()', so why not in this case? Stefan On 27.04.2009, at 03:28, CMF Tests wrote: > CMF Tests : UNKNOWN > CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux > > Running /usr/local/python2.6/bi

[Zope-dev] Python 2.4 + Zope 2.12 [Was: Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed]

Do we still care about Python 2.4 + Zope 2.12? Do we go Python 2.6 only? Thanks, Stefan On 20.04.2009, at 14:00, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: > Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. > Period Sun Apr 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Apr 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC. > There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2 from buildout?

For the time being Zope2 must be used as a develop egg. Like e.g. so: http://svn.zope.org/CMF.buildout/trunk/ Stefan On 13.02.2009, at 13:49, Chris Withers wrote: > I guess this equates to "what does a Zope 2 instance look like now > that > we're buildout-based?"

Re: [Zope-dev] Retiring the Zope SVN trunk? was: Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

I don't think you faired that badly. ;-) One obvious problem is the removal of the 'defaultSkin' directive, which is still in use by CMFDefault. The rest looks harmless. I am not opposed to ditching the trunk, but I don't think keeping it in sync (if only for a transition period) is impossibl

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

While we are at it... The biggest offender is the zodbcode package, which does not appear to pass its tests at all under Python 2.6. Not having investigated this further I can imagine three courses of action: 1) Fix zodbcode (me shrugs) 2) Exclude zodbcode tests from the test suite

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope-tests] UNKNOWN : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux

Enough! I have put a copy of docutils-0.4.tar.gz on the test server and point buildout at it via ~/.buildout/default.cfg. Stefan On 19.01.2009, at 02:55, Zope Tests wrote: > Zope Tests : UNKNOWN > Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux > > Running /usr/local/python2.5/bin/python ./bin/t

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Unknown

> > That test seems to be timing out both yesterday and today trying to > download docutils: do you think having the buildout use a > download_cache would help? > > > Tres. It certainly would. I am however reluctant to enable the download cache because it may mask incomplete buildout configurat

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope-tests] FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux

This looks very much like zope.testbrowser 3.5.1 not passing its own tests. Sidnei, are you listening? Stefan On 12. Nov 2008, at 02:34, Zope Tests wrote: > Zope Tests : FAILED (failures=2) > Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux > > Running /usr/local/python2.4/bin/python test.py -q --all > Runnin

Re: [Zope-dev] svn.zope.org up again?

Up it may be, working it is not. E.g.: Fetching external item into 'python24-zope210/lib/python/zope/testing' svn: Reference to non-existent node 'd2u.9gw.r70272/0' in filesystem '/svn/repos/main/db' Fetching external item into 'python24-zope211/lib/python/zope/decorator' Apython24-zope21

Re: [Zope-dev] Failing Zope 2.8 / Python 2.3 tests on your box

What I have found out now is that in my Python 2.3.6 encodings/ __init__.py does not contain 'import aliases' at module level, whereas the Python 2.4 lib has this import. The patch does this: import encodings encodings._aliases = encoding.aliases.aliases which does therefore not work in 2.3. S

Re: [Zope-dev] Failing Zope 2.8 / Python 2.3 tests on your box

The Python 2.3 on that box hasn't changed in a while, and the encodings module works, at least interactively. $ /usr/local/python2.3/bin/python Python 2.3.6 (#1, Nov 11 2006, 11:08:56) [GCC 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

Re: [Zope-dev] Failing Zope 2.8 / Python 2.3 tests on your box

It is a "hand-compiled" Python 2.3, not the one coming with the distro. I'll have to look into it, maybe ./configure missed something... Stefan On 20. Aug 2008, at 19:57, Tres Seaver wrote: > Tests are blowing up on that box becaues the 'encodings' module has no > attribute 'aliases': AFAICT,

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/branches/plus-minus-option-syntax-for-review/src/zc/buildout/buildout. A patch contributed by Mustapha Benali that provide - and + prefix operators for build

e define a base configuration. -- Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailma

Re: [Zope-dev] fast_listen -> fast-listen for 2.11

No, fast-listen is new in Zope 2.11. Stefan On 06.06.2008, at 07:49, Christian Theune wrote: Hmm. Was this around in 2.10 already? -- Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman

[Zope-dev] fast_listen -> fast-listen for 2.11

I'd like to sneak the following patch into 2.11 before final. The idea is that zope.conf option names should use dashes and not underscores. The downside is that it will break all zope.conf files that already use this option. Objections? Stefan +Bugs Fixed + + - Fixed against-th

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed

://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-May/009619.html -- Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope2 interfaces delenda est!

+1 for trunk -1 for 2.11 branch Stefan On 25. Apr 2008, at 20:49, Tres Seaver wrote: I'd like to rip out the old Interface module from the 2.11 branch and the trunk, along with all the useless decoys which import it. -- Anything that happens, happens. --Douglas Adams

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: Merge philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk

On 17.04.2008, at 12:27, Hanno Schlichting wrote: Opinions, votes? +1 -- Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope without Zope

On 17. Nov 2007, at 02:15, Martin Aspeli wrote: I understand the historical reasons behind these dependencies, but I genuinely think we should pick a few libraries that are "useful" to the outside world (zope.interface, zope.component, zope.configuration, zope.annotation, zope.event come to

[Zope-dev] [ANN] ZopeTestCase now on a layer

I have put all of ZopeTestCase on a test layer, making it possible to mix ZTC and non-ZTC tests more freely. The layer is currently available on the Zope 2 trunk (2.11) only. You can read more here: http://www.zope.org/Members/shh/ZopeTestCaseWiki/ZopeLiteLayer Stefan -- Anything that happe

Re: [Zope-dev] Fix for "request must be post" at "Take Ownership"

I may be missing something here, but the fact that you have to use POST is fully intentional and not a "bug". Stefan On 5. Jul 2007, at 11:27, Jonas Meurer wrote: When do you plan to add the fix for "request must be post" at "Take Ownership" to a stable zope 2.10 release? It seems like this

Re: [Zope-dev] [SVN] Zope trunk - merged stuff for Zope 2.11 released

I plan to land the ZopeLite* layer work for 2.11. It's already running fine in my sandbox but has some implications for existing tests in both Zope and CMF, which I at least need to document. Do you have a target date for 2.11? Stefan (*) ZopeTestCase magic deferred to layer setup time ins

Re: [Zope-dev] problem with the last commit of Five branches 1.4 for Collector #2307

FWIW, I have parked the fix on a branch [1][2] and will wait for Zope 2.9.8 [3]. Stefan [1] http://svn.zope.org/Products.Five/?rev=76908&view=rev [2] http://svn.zope.org/Products.Five/?rev=76909&view=rev [3] http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2007-June/029454.html On 21. Jun 2007, at 1

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

This should of course have read: "I took my cues from how *ObjectMovedEvent* is handled." On 20. Jun 2007, at 13:16, Stefan H. Holek wrote: I took my cues from how ObjectModifiedEvent is handled. I figured copied and moved should be treated the same. Also, there is this comm

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

mple subscriber for IObjectManager that directly calls # dispatchToSublocations. Cheers, Stefan On 20. Jun 2007, at 12:25, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Stefan H. Holek wrote: Log message for revision 76597: Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations. ...

[Zope-dev] Re: What's the deal with sublocations?

Thanks! On 10. Apr 2007, at 18:34, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: No. The dispatch to sublocations is an event handler itself. One should not depend on the execution order of event handlers, therefore you should not depend on this dispatch happening before or after your own event handler

[Zope-dev] What's the deal with sublocations?

Most ObjectEvents are dispatched to "sublocations". I was wondering whether it is ok for me to expect a certain dispatch order, i.e. top- down (container before sublocation) or bottom-up (sublocation before container)? What I find is that this order depends on things like the exact interfa

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug in Traversable.py

Please file a bug, mailing list traffic tends to get lost. Thanks, Stefan On 23. Mär 2007, at 11:12, Roché Compaan wrote: Looks like there is a bug in Zope 2.10.2 with OFS/Traversable.py on line 228: if not ok: if (container is no

Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

The buildbot for Zope 2 won't ever complete successfully unless ZODB.tests.testZODB.checkResetCachesAPI is excluded from the test run. The bot's command line should look something like: python2.4 test.py -vv -m '!^(ZEO|zope[.]app[.])' -t '! checkResetCachesAPI' --all Also see http://mail.z

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/ - Backport a postonly decorator from Zope trunk's requestmethod decorator factory.

Python 2.3 does not support the @decorator syntax. Cheers, Stefan On 20. Mär 2007, at 10:05, Martijn Pieters wrote: Log message for revision 73390: - Backport a postonly decorator from Zope trunk's requestmethod decorator factory. - Protect various security-setting-mutators with this d

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 7 OK

Care to share a test result? FWIW, the nightlies basically do svn co svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/trunk Zope cd Zope ./configure make inplace python2.4 test.py -q --all Which leaves little room for errors, IMO ;-) Stefan On 8. Mär 2007, at 01:27, Christian Theune wrote: I'm questioni

Re: [Zope-dev] Early processing of request body (was: Proposal for optimized Blob handling)

This use-case is already covered by implementing ZPublisher.Iterators.IStreamIterator. You can return a stream iterator to Medusa and free the worker thread immediately. Stefan On 8. Mär 2007, at 05:40, Sidnei da Silva wrote: Hopefully something similar could be done for files being sent

Re: [Zope-dev] [ZPT/Zope 2.10] Unicode fixes backported

In fact, the Zope trunk is a bit of a mess as well. http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2006-December/003658.html Stefan -- Anything that, in happening, causes itself to happen again, happens again. --Douglas Adams ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zo

Re: [Zope-dev] [ZPT/Zope 2.10] Unicode fixes backported

Andreas, The changes are not backward compatible, apparently. http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2006-December/003656.html http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2006-December/003657.html Stefan On 28. Dez 2006, at 14:58, Andreas Jung wrote: I know that this migration is a big hammer

Re: [Zope-dev] Cannot access Zope Management Interface through lighttpd proxy

I haven't used lighttpd but the below rewrite rules doesn't specify the port, it should. Stefan On 12. Okt 2006, at 19:33, yegor wrote: url.rewrite-once = ( "^/plone/(.*)$" => "/VirtualHostBase/http/rio.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/VirtualHostRoot/ _vh_plone/$1" ) -- Anything that happens, happe

Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

FileCacheManager does the copy-to-file-and-serve-as-iterator dance for you. http://www.dataflake.org/software/filecachemanager Stefan On 17. Sep 2006, at 21:09, Sidnei da Silva wrote: One thing that is problematic today is serving large files from the ZODB (ignoring the upcoming blob suppo

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: WebDAV PUT factory tests failing on 2.10 branch

Yes, this is a blocker IMO as it breaks FTP for a whole class of virtual hosting scenarios. No, I don't know how to fix, maybe Lennart? Stefan On 17. Sep 2006, at 12:52, Andreas Jung wrote: --On 17. September 2006 12:38:11 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AFAIK,

[Zope-dev] ZODB.tests.testZODB.checkResetCachesAPI definitely bad

These errors are *also* due to ZODB.tests.testZODB.checkResetCachesAPI. The cache reset appears to leave the Application object and/or transactions in a borked state. All is well when I suppress checkResetCachesAPI: $ python2.4 test.py -q -m '!^(ZEO|zope[.]app[.])' -t '! checkResetCachesAPI

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

errors Stefan On 8. Sep 2006, at 22:44, Stefan H. Holek wrote: /me scratches head. I only see the error when I use the bot's command line, a "normal" test run works fine. $ python2.4 test.py -q --all Running unit tests: The following test left new threads behind: testABOR (zope.s

[Zope-dev] PUT_factory broken in 2.10+

Hi Lennart, Philipp tells me you are responsible for the traversal integration. Any ideas re http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2187? Thanks, Stefan -- Anything that, in happening, causes something else to happen, causes something else to happen. --Douglas Adams

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

/me scratches head. I only see the error when I use the bot's command line, a "normal" test run works fine. $ python2.4 test.py -q --all Running unit tests: The following test left new threads behind: testABOR (zope.server.ftp.tests.test_ftpserver.Tests) New thread(s): [<_DummyThread(Dummy-36,

Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2

The Windows bot is borked, don't blame me ;-) Stefan On 22. Aug 2006, at 12:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000

Re: [Zope-dev] Should PageTemplate._text be a unicode or an encoded string in Zope 2.9.3?

zope.pagetemplate.pagetemplatefile.PageTemplateFile reads an eventual header, or defaults to UTF-8. Stefan On 21. Jul 2006, at 16:53, Chris Withers wrote: I wonder how Zope 3's filesystem-based ZPT's deal with this? -- Anything that, in happening, causes something else to happen, causes

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?

Tres' patch (removing 'include' and 'raw' altogether) looks fairly low on violence to me. No reason to drop reST from Zope, IMO. Stefan On 7. Jul 2006, at 17:03, Jim Fulton wrote: BTW, I suspect that a less violent patch could be created, if anyone wants to champion TTW reStructuedText suppo

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.9/lib/python/ Replace bulk of uses of 'zLOG' with equivalent Python 'logging' module usage.

This, BTW, breaks CMF 1.5 on Zope 2.9. Not sure I/you should care though ;-) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/stefan/autotest/temp/python24-zope29-cmf15/Products/ CMFActionIcons/__init__.py", line 19, in ? from Products.CMFCore.DirectoryView import registerDirectory File

[Zope-dev] Re: Unittests with different zope configuration?

It is needed to update "legacy locations", e.g. copying config.instancehome to the INSTANCE_HOME built-in and into the environment. The debug_mode flag has a legacy location of Globals.DevelopmentMode. Cheers, Stefan On 7. Jun 2006, at 14:28, Florent Guillaume wrote: Stefa

Re: [Zope-dev] Unittests with different zope configuration?

I use this to set debug-mode off: # Switch off debug mode import App.config config = App.config.getConfiguration() config.debug_mode = 0 App.config.setConfiguration(config) Stefan On 5. Jun 2006, at 11:50, Andreas Jung wrote: Does anyone know how to write unittests that ha

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: zope2 requests VS zope3 requests

-1 The whole point of sticking with Zope2 is backward compatibility, isn't it? If I wanted something that doesn't run my old products and applications anymore I would go to Zope3 directly, why thank you. Please keep this in mind in your spree to make Zope2 look like Zope3. Backward compat

Re: [Zope-dev] zeo server conflict resolving

You have to copy or symlink your Products directory into the ZEO instance. At least those Products it tries to load for conflict resolution. HTH, Stefan On 2. Jun 2006, at 10:21, M. Krainer wrote: How can I teach the zeo server to lookup my Products dir to resolve the conflict? -- Anyt

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/App/FactoryDispatcher.py External methods can now live outside of Products based python packages.

Note that Zope2.app() opens a new ZODB connection which you need to close at some point. I suggest something along the lines of: app = Zope2.app() try: products = app.Control_Panel.Products ... finally: app._p_jar.close()

Re: [Zope-dev] Debugging spinning Zope?

http://www.zope.org/Members/4am/debugspinningzope On 18. Apr 2006, at 16:45, Morten W. Petersen wrote: Hi, I have a problem with a Zope that hangs eating up 99.9% of the CPU. I've tried to debug the problem by using DeadlockDebugger but that doesn't even return when accessing it. I guess the

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/ Fixed collector 2057: Testing.makequest broke getPhysicalPath()

For the record: I am still opposed to this change. It basically endows the request (as in self.REQUEST) with a getPhysicalPath method, and I have no idea what kind of side-effects this may have. AFAICS your test suite is the only suite around that wants to request- wrap non-root objects. The

[Zope-dev] Zope Test Summaries 2006-04-05

[We seem to have lost Steve Alexander's test summarizer. I will contact him in a separate mail.] The switch to Python 2.3.4 caused tests for Zope 2.7 and 2.8 to experience a funny problem with the logging module. Anybody want to take a guess what's up here? I know these are not a truly "sup

Re: [Zope-dev] makerequest issues

Out of curiosity, you know that SimpleItem does not have a constructor? You just inherit the one from ExtensionClass.Base, which accepts everything and subsequently ignores it. So your item will have an empty id. This *may* be what you want so your physical path starts with '' instead of 'b

Re: [Zope-dev] makerequest issues

On 4. Apr 2006, at 22:08, Paul Winkler wrote: On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:09:05PM +0200, Stefan H. Holek wrote: This looks fine to me because the world ends at parent. Your earlier example wrapped an object that was in the middle of an acquisition chain (IIRC), no, I think you invented that

Re: [Zope-dev] makerequest issues

The one in ZopeTestCase.utils is also meant to play with startZServer (same module). I agree that the one in Testing.makerequest could probably gain ACTUAL_URL, and maybe even the request._steps hack to make URL1 and friends available... However, I have not seen these URL vars used anywhere

Re: [Zope-dev] makerequest issues

On 4. Apr 2006, at 16:53, Paul Winkler wrote: Hmmm, but unit tests very often don't reflect "reality" - deliberately! Because "reality" is Too Much Stuff. True enough. Any other opinions on this? Do we really need to require an App at the root any time we want to acquire REQUEST? That se

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug in Zope 2.9?

This is an old ZODB, right? ZGlobals is used by ZClasses. There used to be a time when ZGlobals was still a BTree when it should have been a BTrees.BTree. Then some migration code was added. I suppose the error comes from the fact that BTree.so is now finally no longer part of Zope and your

Re: [Zope-dev] makerequest issues

I don't think makerequest is intended for wrapping anything but the root application object. Putting the RequestContainer on arbitrary objects doesn't feel right and certainly isn't how Zope does it, i.e. you get a test fixture that doesn't reflect "reality". NotABug/WontFix ;-) Stefan O

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope2.8.7] with Five 1.0 or Five 1.2

+1 On 27. Mär 2006, at 07:35, Andreas Jung wrote: Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope 2.8 are using Five 1.2. Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope 2.8 to Five 1.2 to make their lives a

Re: [Zope-dev] IMO ZClasses should stay

+1 I have handed systems with a thin ZClass layer on top to semi- developers and they were *easily* able to take it from there. These are people who would never have grokked (and bothered with) disk- based Python development and all the mumbo-jumbo it entails. No other system has anything e

[Zope-dev] Re: Python warnings behavior and stacklevel=2

This turned out to be a bug in FSPythonScripts (no __file__ in script globals). Fixed on all branches of CMF >= 1.5. Cheers, Stefan On 13. Feb 2006, at 16:48, Julien Anguenot wrote: Florent Guillaume wrote: Julien Anguenot wrote: Tim Peters wrote: [Julien Anguenot] I'm having some probl

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

AFAIK the default configuration used by tests does not have a dbtab. See lib/python/App/config.py. Stefan On Jan 14, 2006, at 16:45, Florent Guillaume wrote: I'll look at it. Florent Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This failure is tie up with Florent's re

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-2.9 r40780 make install doesn't finish, files missing from bin

On 18. Dez 2005, at 17:58, Tim Peters wrote: Nobody should be installing from a checkout to begin with, right? Ok, so that's probably where we disagree then ;-) I almost exclusively work with checkouts, and I would think many developers (as opposed to "users") do. Is there really no way to

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-2.9 r40780 make install doesn't finish, files missing from bin

"make install" does currently not work on 2.9 branch and trunk. I am told that this is because "zpkg cannot do it". I am also told that the tarball would support make install, just not the checkout. I never use tarballs, so I don't know for sure. I'd very much like to see the canonical "./c

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope tests: 5 OK, 3 Failed

Yup, that box is slowly dying on me. I will take down the nightlies until I find a new machine to run them on. Stefan On 14. Dez 2005, at 15:35, Chris McDonough wrote: FYI: These tests appear to be failing due to a race in the tests they're exercising that could be exposed if the machine

Re: [Zope-dev] New ways of getting transactions?

import transaction transaction.get() transaction.commit() transaction.abort() transaction.savepoint() This works since 2.8, but not in 2.7. Nearly every project has come up with its own backward compatibility module though. See for example CMFCore.utils.transaction or CMFPlone.transaction.

Re: [Zope-dev] ZSQL method and LIMIT clause

*Everything* you can do in the ZMI can be done from code. The ZMI is not a magic entity, it uses the same APIs as everybody else. With FSZSQLMethods you can stick max_rows: 0 into the lead-in comment, BTW. Stefan On 3. Nov 2005, at 03:37, Thanh Hải, Hà wrote: My problem is I don't know to

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Shared/DC/ZRDB/ Collector #556: sqlvar now returns 'null' rather than 'None'.

This change breaks Gadfly which doesn't seem to like 'null' at all. I poked around in ZGadflyDA/gadfly a bit, but it's not obvious to me how to fix the parser (*.mar files anyone?). Stefan [snip] File "/usr/local/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZGadflyDA/ gadfly/kjParser.py", line 82

[Zope-dev] OSX: zopectl test results in "Interrupted system call"

Since r37701 "zopectl test" forks off a child process [1]. On OSX I now reliably get a traceback tacked onto the end of every test report: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Zope8/lib/python/Zope2/Startup/zopectl.py", line 312, in ? main() File "/Zope8/lib/python/Zope2/Startup/zo

Re: [Zope-dev] RAMcache and container vs. context

A TALES expression may be prohibitively expensive in any case, no matter how simple it is kept. Please make sure to do some comparative profiling. Cache keys are recomputed on every call of the script, AFAICS. The thought of doing this in restricted Python makes my skin crawl. Stefan On

Re: [Zope-dev] RAMcache and container vs. context

This is due to how Python Scripts compute their cache keys. The relevant snippet from PythonScript._exec() is: asgns = self.getBindingAssignments() name_context = asgns.getAssignedName('name_context', None) if name_context: keyset[name_context]

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: guarded_getattr

rse(path, default, restricted=1) File "/Users/stefan/autotest/temp/python23-zope27/lib/python/OFS/ Traversable.py", line 180, in unrestrictedTraverse o = guarded_getattr(object, name, M) AttributeError: manage_addFile On 15. Feb 2005, at 21:29, Stefan H. Holek wrote: Most excell

[Zope-dev] Re: guarded_getattr

Most excellent fix, thanks! Stefan On 14. Feb 2005, at 20:24, Jim Fulton wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: Jim and I worked on an alternative fix today -- he will be checking it in to your branch shortly, including modifying cAccessControl. Done. Jim -- Software Engineering is Programming when you can't.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: guarded_getattr

Hi Tres, Yes, this makes the checked in tests pass. This just means I did not check in enough tests yet though ;-) I have added tests to 'shh-aqtests-branch' that demonstrate Richard Jones' use case of acquiring a simple type (string). These tests still fail. I have also added tests to CMFDefa

[Zope-dev] guarded_getattr

Tres, I'd very much appreciate your opinion on http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2005-January/024237.html http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2005-January/024242.html Plone is breaking left and right and I gotta do something about it... Thanks, Stefan -- The time has come to start talking

[Zope-dev] More on [Removal of aq_acquire from guarded_getattr]

The failing AccessControl tests can now be found on shh-aqtests-branch in zope.org CVS. Observations: a) guarded_getattr checks object security of the acquiree if the container denies access (at least that's my assessment). b) The tests pass when either - running Zope < 2.7.3, or - declarin

[Zope-dev] Removal of aq_acquire from guarded_getattr

The bug: http://zope.org/Collectors/CMF/259 The fix: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-checkins/2004-August/028152.html This effectively changes how acquisition works in restricted Python. I understand this may well be the point . The consequences: Zope sites experiencing seemingly random Unaut

[Zope-dev] roman.py missing on 2.7 branch?

Seems docutils is not there just yet. I have added a test to reStructuredText that tries to import the rst parser and it - gasp - fails. Stefan -- The time has come to start talking about whether the emperor is as well dressed as we are supposed to think he is. /Pete McBreen/ _

[Zope-dev] FYI: test.py changes rolled back

I have restored test.py to the version shipping with Zope 2.7.3. The changes made to accommodate Florent's use-case (adjacent symlinks) broke some of mine. In particular, without calling realpath (or abspath) on libdir, trailing slashes caused no tests to be found, as did some combinations of '

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

*sound of me protesting noisily* Let me remind you of the Pope's decree: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2004-November/024073.html Stefan On 16. Dez 2004, at 20:14, Andreas Jung wrote: --On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2004 19:28 Uhr +0100 Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just for

Re: [Zope-dev] getUserById

Hm, I'd rather not raise exceptions. getUserById was introduced in Zope 2.2 and since then has never raised anything. From what I can see it is used as a kind of alias for getUser, expected to return None if the user does not exist. So, my intention is to make 'default' work, not to make it rais

[Zope-dev] getUserById

In User.py the method is defined as def getUserById(self, id, default=_marker): try: return self.getUser(id) except: if default is _marker: raise return default I am wondering whether anybody actually depends on the fact that getUser is supposed to raise an exceptio

[Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

[docutils was moved from lib/python/docutils to lib/python/third_party/docutils/docutils and an ugly sys.path hack employed] Why oh why do we always have to make it harder to start up Zope (instead of making it simpler, for once)? Extending the path in lib/python/sitecustomize only works if li

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Checkins] CVS: Zope - test.py:1.2.2.16

This one does not even need symlinks (note that I run the tests from Products): localhost:/Users/zope/plone27/Products$ \ > /Zope/bin/test.py -v -C ../etc/zope.conf --libdir . --dir CMFPlone Running unit tests at level 1 Running unit tests from /Users/zope/plone27/Products/CMFPlone Parsing /Users

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Checkins] CVS: Zope - test.py:1.2.2.16

Sorry Florent, I missed your warning mail. I have two issues with the patch: a) Trailing slash no longer works (--libdir Products/) b) Some combinations of --libdir and --dir and symlinks no longer work on Mac OS X (HFS) Unfortunately os.getcwd() returns different paths in the presence of symlin

Re: [Zope-dev] tests with CMF 1.4 and Zope 2.7.3

There is no "bug", IMO. In CVS/SVN test.py lives in the root of Zope. It just stays there when you make inplace or make instance (or make anything for that matter). Removing it would break the checkout. Stefan On 18. Nov 2004, at 12:57, Lennart Regebro wrote: Stefan H. Holek wrote: +

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Was: Re: 2.7.3 beta attribute permission problems

Hi Tres! On 22.10.2004, at 14:38, Tres Seaver wrote: Given that the change was required to implement a security fix, and without a reproducible test case for the reported breakage, I don't think we can credit the rumors. We *definitely* don't want to defer the security fix. I still don't know w

Re: [Zope-dev] Product doesn't work in zope 2.7 that was working in 2.6

Note that 2.6.4 contains massive changes to the security implementation. I'd imagine the product you use has not been updated accordingly. Stefan On 13.10.2004, at 17:24, Nagarjuna G. wrote: This product works perfectly till 2.6.3, starting from 2.6.4 and upwards this problem appears. Looking a

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Bad interaction between Zope 2.7.3 and CMF 1.4

Note that I found it to be relevant which object I want to acquire (don't ask me why, though). E.g. going back to my CMFDefault examples, I *can* acquire portal_workflow and portal_url, but I can *not* acquire portal_membership and acl_users from a denied context. Go figure. If I change the te

[Zope-dev] Re: Bad interaction between Zope 2.7.3 and CMF 1.4

On 09.10.2004, at 18:04, Tres Seaver wrote: *By definition*, anybody who has declared 'setDefaultAccess('deny') *wants* the behavior you describe: that declaration says, "unless I give you explicit permission for using a name, refuse." If Plone has classes which make such assertions, then eithe

[Zope-dev] Bad interaction between Zope 2.7.3 and CMF 1.4

While testing a large-ish customer project under Zope 2.7.3 we found that when an object with setDefaultAccess('deny') is used as the context for a PythonScript, the script can no longer aquire tools from the portal root. Because a test says more than a thousand words, I added one to CMFDefault.

[Zope-dev] Conditional imports in ZTUtils/__init__.py

ZTUtils/__init__.py contains code like this: if sys.modules.has_key('Zope'): # import things This is causing me repeated headaches when writing tests, because it assumes/dictates a certain module import order. Can this go away, please? I mean we know we are running Zope, don't we? If the

Re: [Zope-dev] Weird AssertionError on History Compare in Zope 2.7.1 PythonScript

Did you try to recompile the PythonScripts? Stefan On Mittwoch, Jun 30, 2004, at 18:52 Europe/Vienna, Chris Withers wrote: I upgraded a Zope 2.6.2 site to 2.7.1. Since then, the history tab of all my old Script(Python)'s is broken. -- The time has come to start talking about whether the emperor is

  1   2   >