Oops, wrong URL! This is the right one: http://lwn.net/Articles/139955/
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:08 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > > From what I read from Rob in an interview in LWN, membership to the
> > > foundation will b
Note that this article is now available without a subscription at
http://lwn.net/Articles/139770/
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:08 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > > From what I read from Rob in an interview in LWN, membership to th
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> kit blake wrote:
>
>> Wow, what a difference two days makes. I heard about the ZF
>> announcement by telephone two mornings ago, and I breathed a huge sigh
>> of relief. It solves a problem we've been worrying about for years. It
>> means we can sit across from a
kit blake wrote:
Wow, what a difference two days makes. I heard about the ZF
announcement by telephone two mornings ago, and I breathed a huge sigh
of relief. It solves a problem we've been worrying about for years. It
means we can sit across from a nervous IT director, and when he asks
dubious q
Wow, what a difference two days makes. I heard about the ZF
announcement by telephone two mornings ago, and I breathed a huge sigh
of relief. It solves a problem we've been worrying about for years. It
means we can sit across from a nervous IT director, and when he asks
dubious questions about the
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > From what I read from Rob in an interview in LWN, membership to the
> > foundation will be funded by membership dues.
>
> Given that any actual facts and further discussions involving ZC have
> been postponed to the IRC chat
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:52 -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
Also, I agree with Andreas and Philipp that developers should be members, not
companies. Otherwise, how could I, as an independent developer, have a say?
BTW, this is also positive for companies, since they can ha
Chris McDonough wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:52 -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
>
>
>>Also, I agree with Andreas and Philipp that developers should be members, not
>>companies. Otherwise, how could I, as an independent developer, have a say?
>>BTW, this is also positive for companies, since
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
I hope we will be able to discuss this further next week, but also that
these discussions will be able to procede with the technical side of
things during the sprint next week.
s/with/alongside/
Sorry for my poor english.
Remember that some of us are not native eng
Paul Everitt wrote:
Other foundations approach things a bit differently. (I did quite a
bit of research on this for the Plone Foundation.)
Eric has done some research recently on the different successful Open
Source / Free Software foundations out there that have the mission to
develop and pr
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:52 -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Also, I agree with Andreas and Philipp that developers should be members, not
> companies. Otherwise, how could I, as an independent developer, have a say?
> BTW, this is also positive for companies, since they can have several
> develo
On Jun 17, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Paul Everitt wrote:
Other foundations approach things a bit differently. (I did quite
a bit of research on this for the Plone Foundation.)
Eric has done some research recently on the different successful
Open Source / Free Softwar
On Jun 17, 2005, at 1:52 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2005 07:16, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Then when I look at the members of the Plone foundation (
http://plone.org/foundation/about/board/list ) I only see companies,
except that ZC is not represented. So even if every membe
On Jun 17, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
However, most members do not write code during their free time, do
they?
What happens when the members write code under working hours, their
respective employers must well have something to say about it?
The PF actually did research o
On Friday 17 June 2005 07:16, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
> Then when I look at the members of the Plone foundation (
> http://plone.org/foundation/about/board/list ) I only see companies,
> except that ZC is not represented. So even if every member gets a vote,
> how much does that vote count in th
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
>
>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
>>>
>>>
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:29:33 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:04:17 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:04:17 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation eve
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
vendor-neutral. I am confident that thi
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
>
>> This is really great news!
>>
>> I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
>> players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
>> vendor-neutral. I am confident that this will go throug
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:04:17 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
vendor-neutr
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
vendor-neutral. I am confident that this will go through.
This almost sounds as if the Foundation isn't
Eric Barroca wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Following the announces from Zope Corporation yesterday about their
> willingness to create a Zope Foundation (that would manage
> independently Zope 2 and Zope 3 projects) and to participate actively
> in the Z3ECM project, I would like to express briefly Nux
23 matches
Mail list logo
