On 08.10.2007, at 21:00, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jodok Batlogg wrote at 2007-10-8 08:48 +0200:
...
do you know about the performance? if you compare a modern, fast
linux server - connected to the SAN as well?
i think the solaris machine will perform well if you need to run
multiple ZEOs...
I had
Jodok Batlogg wrote at 2007-10-8 08:48 +0200:
> ...
>do you know about the performance? if you compare a modern, fast
>linux server - connected to the SAN as well?
>i think the solaris machine will perform well if you need to run
>multiple ZEOs...
I had compared packing on our previous generat
--On 8. Oktober 2007 08:48:54 +0200 Jodok Batlogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 07.10.2007, at 21:42, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jodok Batlogg wrote at 2007-10-7 12:09 +0200:
hi,
it seems like we're going to deploy a pretty big installation on a
combination of solaris / RHEL servers.
the data
On 07.10.2007, at 21:42, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jodok Batlogg wrote at 2007-10-7 12:09 +0200:
hi,
it seems like we're going to deploy a pretty big installation on a
combination of solaris / RHEL servers.
the data storage of our application is based on ZODB (ZEO) and
PostgreSQL (with STORM) plus
Jodok Batlogg wrote at 2007-10-7 12:09 +0200:
>hi,
>
>it seems like we're going to deploy a pretty big installation on a
>combination of solaris / RHEL servers.
>the data storage of our application is based on ZODB (ZEO) and
>PostgreSQL (with STORM) plus NFS for extfile handling.
>so far it's p
hi,
it seems like we're going to deploy a pretty big installation on a
combination of solaris / RHEL servers.
the data storage of our application is based on ZODB (ZEO) and
PostgreSQL (with STORM) plus NFS for extfile handling.
so far it's planned to deploy ZEO, PostgreSQL and NFS on a fully
